Con in Bristol

>
>
> On reflection I think its the firebox - -you know - where they shovel thecoal into!!
> And yes,the railways would disagree with me about beauty, but boy, some of these engines are truly magnificent.
>
>
> --- In [hidden email], Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@> wrote:
> >
> > Speaking of the coal tender, maybe?  Probably called something else in the UK.
> >  
> > Beauty of a steam loco is more important?  Betting the railways would have argued that point with you, lol.  : )
> >  
> > Jeff
> >
> >
>

>
>
> On reflection I think its the firebox - -you know - where they shovel thecoal into!!
> And yes,the railways would disagree with me about beauty, but boy, some of these engines are truly magnificent.
>
>
> --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@> wrote:
> >
> > Speaking of the coal tender, maybe?  Probably called something else in the UK.
> >  
> > Beauty of a steam loco is more important?  Betting the railways would have argued that point with you, lol.  : )
> >  
> > Jeff
> >
> >
>

>
> I heard that they aren't going to design any of the vehicles to look likeBritish steam locomotives, lol.  ; )
>  
> Jeff
>
> --- On Sat, 3/13/10, Lightcudder <l.oatridge@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Lightcudder <l.oatridge@...>
> Subject: [SHADO] Re: Con in Bristol
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 9:26 AM
>
>
>  
>
>
>
> Look, to get back to the main point of this forum!!!(UFO)
> (although its fun duscussing steam trains!) What exactly IS happening with the new UFO film? Anything? Anything at all?
>
> Please tell me that's it's going ahead.!
>
> --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, "Lightcudder" <l.oatridge@ ...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On reflection I think its the firebox - -you know - where they shovel the coal into!!
> > And yes,the railways would disagree with me about beauty, but boy, someof these engines are truly magnificent.
> >
> >
> > --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Speaking of the coal tender, maybe?  Probably called something else in the UK.
> > >  
> > > Beauty of a steam loco is more important?  Betting the railways would have argued that point with you, lol.  : )
> > >  
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> I heard that they aren't going to design any of the vehicles to look likeBritish steam locomotives, lol.  ; )
>  
> Jeff
>
> --- On Sat, 3/13/10, Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...>
> Subject: [SHADO] Re: Con in Bristol
> To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
> Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 9:26 AM
>
>
>  
>
>
>
> Look, to get back to the main point of this forum!!!(UFO)
> (although its fun duscussing steam trains!) What exactly IS happening with the new UFO film? Anything? Anything at all?
>
> Please tell me that's it's going ahead.!
>
> --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, "Lightcudder" <l.oatridge@ ...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On reflection I think its the firebox - -you know - where they shovel the coal into!!
> > And yes,the railways would disagree with me about beauty, but boy, someof these engines are truly magnificent.
> >
> >
> > --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Speaking of the coal tender, maybe?  Probably called something else in the UK.
> > >  
> > > Beauty of a steam loco is more important?  Betting the railways would have argued that point with you, lol.  : )
> > >  
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> Why don't you draw one with a coal tender?
>
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Lightcudder
> <l.oatridge@...>wrote:
>
> > Very funny !! Can you imagine someone having to stoke up the
> > Interceptors before they launched them!! I'm off to draw one (an Interceptor
> > that is)
> >
> >
> > Mario
>
> http://mario.silent-tower.org/
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> LOL.  I like it!  Steampunk (look it up) Interceptors!!  :)
>  
> Ok, my last off topic post about steam locomotives.  You mentioned the large size of the Mallard's firebox.  It happens to be 231.2 squarefeet in area, with an effective grate area of 41.25 square feet.  By comparison, FWIW (nothing, really), the firebox area of the Northern Pacific Z-5 class loco is 872 square feet, with a grate area of 182 square feet.  Now THAT is large.  : )
>
> Jeff
> --- On Sat, 3/13/10, Lightcudder <l.oatridge@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Lightcudder <l.oatridge@...>
> Subject: [SHADO] Re: Con in Bristol
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 10:47 AM
>
>
>  
>
>
>
> Very funny !! Can you imagine someone having to stoke up the Interceptorsbefore they launched them!! I'm off to draw one (an Interceptor that is)
> LtCdr
>
> --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@ > wrote:
> >
> > I heard that they aren't going to design any of the vehicles to look like British steam locomotives, lol.  ; )
> >  
> > Jeff
> >
> > --- On Sat, 3/13/10, Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...>
> > Subject: [SHADO] Re: Con in Bristol
> > To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
> > Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 9:26 AM
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> > Look, to get back to the main point of this forum!!!(UFO)
> > (although its fun duscussing steam trains!) What exactly IS happening with the new UFO film? Anything? Anything at all?
> >
> > Please tell me that's it's going ahead.!
> >
> > --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, "Lightcudder" <l.oatridge@ ...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On reflection I think its the firebox - -you know - where they shovelthe coal into!!
> > > And yes,the railways would disagree with me about beauty, but boy, some of these engines are truly magnificent.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Speaking of the coal tender, maybe?  Probably called something else in the UK.
> > > >  
> > > > Beauty of a steam loco is more important?  Betting the railways would have argued that point with you, lol.  : )
> > > >  
> > > > Jeff
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> As a steampunk fan, I'd be very interested in a steampunk UFO
> series. Has anyone ever written any such fanfic?
>  
> Evelyn Duncan
> brandykitt@...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 3/13/2010 10:49:14 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
> l.oatridge@... writes:
>
> Can you imagine someone having to stoke up the Interceptors before they
> launched them!! I'm off to draw one (an Interceptor that is)
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> Neo-Victorian science fiction. Think "Wild, Wild West" on TV
> or "The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen" or "The Difference
> Engine" in books. There was a lot of things that could be used
> in science fiction then: telephone, telegraph, trains, people
> working on rockets and flying machines.
>  
> Evelyn Duncan
> brandykitt@...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 3/13/2010 2:06:19 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
> l.oatridge@... writes:
>
> Steampunk...St
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> LOL.  I like it!  Steampunk (look it up) Interceptors! !  : )
>  
> Ok, my last off topic post about steam locomotives.  You mentioned the large size of the Mallard's firebox.  It happens to be 231.2 square feet in area, with an effective grate area of 41.25 square feet.  By comparison, FWIW (nothing, really), the firebox area of the Northern Pacific Z-5 class loco is 872 square feet, with a grate area of182 square feet.  Now THAT is large.  : )
>
> Jeff
> --- On Sat, 3/13/10, Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...>
> Subject: [SHADO] Re: Con in Bristol
> To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
> Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 10:47 AM
>
>
>  
>
>
>
> Very funny !! Can you imagine someone having to stoke up the Interceptorsbefore they launched them!! I'm off to draw one (an Interceptor that is)
> LtCdr
>
> --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@ > wrote:
> >
> > I heard that they aren't going to design any of the vehicles to look like British steam locomotives, lol.  ; )
> >  
> > Jeff
> >
> > --- On Sat, 3/13/10, Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...>
> > Subject: [SHADO] Re: Con in Bristol
> > To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
> > Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 9:26 AM
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> > Look, to get back to the main point of this forum!!!(UFO)
> > (although its fun duscussing steam trains!) What exactly IS happening with the new UFO film? Anything? Anything at all?
> >
> > Please tell me that's it's going ahead.!
> >
> > --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, "Lightcudder" <l.oatridge@ ...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On reflection I think its the firebox - -you know - where they shovelthe coal into!!
> > > And yes,the railways would disagree with me about beauty, but boy, some of these engines are truly magnificent.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Speaking of the coal tender, maybe?  Probably called something else in the UK.
> > > >  
> > > > Beauty of a steam loco is more important?  Betting the railways would have arguedthat point with you, lol.  : )
> > > >  
> > > > Jeff
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> As a steampunk fan, I'd be very interested in a steampunk UFO
> series. Has anyone ever written any such fanfic?
>
> Evelyn Duncan
> brandykitt@. ..
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 3/13/2010 10:49:14 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> l.oatridge@. .. writes:
>
> Can you imagine someone having to stoke up the Interceptors before they
> launched them!! I'm off to draw one (an Interceptor that is)
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> Wow.  You work in a closet?
>
> --- On Sat, 3/13/10, Lightcudder <l.oatridge@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Lightcudder <l.oatridge@...>
> Subject: [SHADO] Re: Con in Bristol
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 11:42 AM
>
>
>  
>
>
>
> Still big enough to put a double bed in... and bigger than the room I work in!!
>
> --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@ > wrote:
> >
> > LOL.  I like it!  Steampunk (look it up) Interceptors! !  : )
> >  
> > Ok, my last off topic post about steam locomotives.  You mentioned the large size of the Mallard's firebox.  It happens to be 231.2 square feet in area, with an effective grate area of 41.25 square feet.  By comparison, FWIW (nothing, really), the firebox area ofthe Northern Pacific Z-5 class loco is 872 square feet, with a grate area of 182 square feet.  Now THAT is large.  : )
> >
> > Jeff
> > --- On Sat, 3/13/10, Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...>
> > Subject: [SHADO] Re: Con in Bristol
> > To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
> > Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 10:47 AM
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> > Very funny !! Can you imagine someone having to stoke up the Interceptors before they launched them!! I'm off to draw one (an Interceptor that is)
> > LtCdr
> >
> > --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@ > wrote:
> > >
> > > I heard that they aren't going to design any of the vehicles to look like British steam locomotives, lol.  ; )
> > >  
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > > --- On Sat, 3/13/10, Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...>
> > > Subject: [SHADO] Re: Con in Bristol
> > > To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
> > > Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 9:26 AM
> > >
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Look, to get back to the main point of this forum!!!(UFO)
> > > (although its fun duscussing steam trains!) What exactly IS happeningwith the new UFO film? Anything? Anything at all?
> > >
> > > Please tell me that's it's going ahead.!
> > >
> > > --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, "Lightcudder" <l.oatridge@ ...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On reflection I think its the firebox - -you know - where they shovel the coal into!!
> > > > And yes,the railways would disagree with me about beauty, but boy, some of these engines are truly magnificent.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Speaking of the coal tender, maybe?ÃÆ'‚  Probably called something else in the UK.
> > > > > ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > Beauty of a steam loco is more important?ÃÆ'‚  Betting the railways would have arguedthat point with you, lol.ÃÆ'‚  : )
> > > > > ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > Jeff
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> Wow.  You work in a closet?
>
> --- On Sat, 3/13/10, Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...>
> Subject: [SHADO] Re: Con in Bristol
> To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
> Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 11:42 AM
>
>
>  
>
>
>
> Still big enough to put a double bed in... and bigger than the room I work in!!
>
> --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@ > wrote:
> >
> > LOL.  I like it!  Steampunk (look it up) Interceptors! !  : )
> >  
> > Ok, my last off topic post about steam locomotives.  You mentioned the large size of the Mallard's firebox.  It happens to be 231.2 square feet in area, with an effective grate area of 41.25 square feet.  By comparison, FWIW (nothing, really), the firebox area of the Northern Pacific Z-5 class loco is 872 square feet, with a grate area of 182 square feet.  Now THAT is large.  : )
> >
> > Jeff
> > --- On Sat, 3/13/10, Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...>
> > Subject: [SHADO] Re: Con in Bristol
> > To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
> > Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 10:47 AM
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> > Very funny !! Can you imagine someone having to stoke up the Interceptors before they launched them!! I'm off to draw one (an Interceptor that is)
> > LtCdr
> >
> > --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@ > wrote:
> > >
> > > I heard that they aren't going to design any of the vehicles to look like British steam locomotives, lol.  ; )
> > >  
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > > --- On Sat, 3/13/10, Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Lightcudder <l.oatridge@ ...>
> > > Subject: [SHADO] Re: Con in Bristol
> > > To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
> > > Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 9:26 AM
> > >
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Look, to get back to the main point of this forum!!!(UFO)
> > > (although its fun duscussing steam trains!) What exactly IS happeningwith the new UFO film? Anything? Anything at all?
> > >
> > > Please tell me that's it's going ahead.!
> > >
> > > --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, "Lightcudder" <l.oatridge@ ...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On reflection I think its the firebox - -you know - where they shovel the coal into!!
> > > > And yes,the railways would disagree with me about beauty, but boy, some of these engines are truly magnificent.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Speaking of the coal tender, maybe?ÃÆ'‚  Probably called something else in the UK.
> > > > > ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > Beauty of a steam loco is more important?ÃÆ'‚  Betting the railways would have argued that point with you, lol.ÃÆ'‚  : )
> > > > > ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > > > Jeff
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

>
> Duh on you?  More like duh on me.  Maybe a couple months  after I had joined the group (and hadn't been back yet), and before Ireally understood that messages could be both posted directly through the group and through email, and read the same way, I posted a question asking why I was seeing "Nafofu" on some of my posts, and what the heck it meant.  In my old age I had totally forgotten.  Fortunately, a fellow lister obviously smarter than I am figured it out and pointed this out to me.  So duh on me. 
>  
> I can't believe I just revisited one of the most embarassing episodes in my life.
>  
>  
> Jeff
> P.S.  In my defense (?), I had tried about a dozen variations on "SHADO" for a user name, and all were already taken or disallowed.  So infrustration I just typed ufofan backwards.  So it wasn't my first choice, and I think I was traumatized by the entire thing.  : )
>
> --- On Sun, 3/14/10, Lightcudder <l.oatridge@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Lightcudder <l.oatridge@...>
> Subject: [SHADO] Re: Con in Bristol
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Sunday, March 14, 2010, 3:17 PM
>
>
>  
>
>
>
> Well DUH! I've just worked out what your username means. Boy am I dense at times!
> Like it though! Nafofu!
>
> --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@ > wrote:
> >
> > You're not incarcerated, are you?  Hee hee.  : )
> >  
> > That's pretty small.  Ever get to feeling claustrophobic?
> >  
> > Jeff
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>