Futuristic Airframe

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Futuristic Airframe

T. Hart
Hi!

Saw some of the responses to my query on tilt rotor aircraft. The Harrier is
not the same thing at all, from my perspective. The Harrier has a single,
though very powerful, Rolls Royce Pegasus engine. The airframe in UFO was
more like the OV-22 Osprey, but it had jet engines on some sort of wing
attachment. Why are there no jet engine helicopters?

Tom
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Futuristic Airframe

anthonyappleyard <MCLSSAA2@fs2.mt.umist.ac.uk>
"T. Hart" <[hidden email]> wrote:-
> .... Why are there no jet engine helicopters?

I read once about a helicopter with no ordinary motor but instead it had a
little jet engine on the end of each rotor blade.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Futuristic Airframe

James Gibbon-2
In reply to this post by T. Hart
"T. Hart" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Saw some of the responses to my query on tilt rotor aircraft. The Harrier is
> not the same thing at all, from my perspective. The Harrier has a single,
> though very powerful, Rolls Royce Pegasus engine. The airframe in UFO was
> more like the OV-22 Osprey, but it had jet engines on some sort of wing
> attachment. Why are there no jet engine helicopters?
>
>

Modern helicopters are often powered by jet engines - eg the
American 'Huey' as used in Vietnam - of course the jet is used to
drive the rotor blades. I suppose that the centre of gravity has
to be under source of the 'lift' or it would be very unstable - I
suppose a helicopter with a jet engine mounted underneath, facing
downward would be liable to topple very easily. So I suppose you'd
need a minimum of three jet engines, each extended upward and away
from the cockpit. Then if one of them failed, the whole thing
would turn over (I suppose).

James
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Futuristic Airframe

anthonyappleyard <MCLSSAA2@fs2.mt.umist.ac.uk>
James Gibbon <[hidden email]> wrote:-
> Modern helicopters are often powered by jet engines - eg the American 'Huey'
> as used in Vietnam - of course the jet is used to drive the rotor blades.

Do you mean a jet engine that makes a jet blast, or do you mean a gas-turbine
engine that outputs its power down a drive shaft? There IS a difference.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Futuristic Airframe

James Gibbon-2
"Anthony Appleyard" wrote:

> Do you mean a jet engine that makes a jet blast, or do you mean a
> gas-turbine engine that outputs its power down a drive shaft? There IS
> a difference.
>

Well, I have no idea what the difference is so I'll defer to you
on that .. but I understood that the blast from the jet drove a
'small propellor' of some kind, which in turn drove the rotors ..
at least that's what I had read somewhere.

(I suspect that we'll be getting our knuckles rapped for discussing
non-SHADO-specific hardware issues any minute now .. :)

<cough> I believe there was speculation a while ago that Straker's
car was driven by a gas turbine, based on the distinctive whining
engine noise ..

James