CORRECTION: Sorry, I meant Ford Prefect (not Arthur Dent).
Best Wishes, BRIAN ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Brian Serridge <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Sent: Thu, 11 February, 2010 11:51:57 Subject: Fw: [SHADO] Re: my thoughts about the UFO movie.../WHICH YEAR FOR UFO? I agree. I was surprised when they made Arthur Dent a black man in the filmversion of "The Hitch-Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy." I always thought of Arthur as white. There's political correctness for you again. It was an understandable mistake setting UFO in 1980. Maybe it should have been set in theyear 2500 instead. Now there's a question for all you UFO fans: Which year would you have ideally set "UFO" in? ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Billy Killian <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Sent: Thu, 11 February, 2010 4:14:14 Subject: Re: [SHADO] Re: my thoughts about the UFO movie.... I think I have said it before but it still hold true and that is if its notbroke don't fix it. If as they say the love the original UFO there is no need to put a new spin on a character by making them a different Ethnic group or different hair color or age or what ever. Since they are going to set this about ten years in the future which is the same amount of time that the original UFO was set ahead they can play around with the Tech and vehicleand craft designs and set designs and even costuming to a certain degree. But when they start making any changes to the characters it stops being UFO. Oh, Denise, love the sight and stories. James K. ____________ _________ _________ __ From: Bruce Sherman <brucesherman@ sprintmail. com> To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com Sent: Wed, February 10, 2010 8:55:31 PM Subject: Re: [SHADO] Re: my thoughts about the UFO movie... I don't know if Gene would have liked it all. Spock scoring with Uhura?? Heliked her for himself :) They dated if you didn't know, Gene and Nichele. Bruce ----- Original Message ----- From: Neesierie To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 7:36 PM Subject: [SHADO] Re: my thoughts about the UFO movie... Anthony, I quite agree. I have always hated remakes. They never seem to get what made the original a hit needed to STAY a part of the show! That said, I so totally enjoyed the remake of Star Trek that I'm hopeful that UFO will have a similar miracle. I know some ST fans hated the remake, but I'm a diehard fan myself and I laughed and laughed! Gene would have loved it. So it could happen again -- for UFO this time. We'll all find out one way or the other anyway, won't we? In just about a year's time. Yours, Denise --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Anthony Smith <belmarbadboy@ ...> wrote: > > > See thats what I'm talking about--when you start changing the color and genders of the characters of the show,it tends to ruin the memory of the show(my personal opinion). By the way--I'm black and not biased against color or gender for the record-just not for re-makes of original shows or movies.Some things you just cant do like that. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
UFO would HAVE to be set in the early to mid 80s. If it was set today,
they'd spend far too much time suppressing internet conspiracy theories. The whole secrecy gig would be up! I mean, imagine trying to hide all that Skydiver stuff with Google Earth? You'd have the black helicopter brigade in fits! On 11 Feb 2010, at 15:37, Brian Serridge wrote: > CORRECTION: Sorry, I meant Ford Prefect (not Arthur Dent). > > Best Wishes, > > BRIAN > > ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: Brian Serridge <[hidden email]> > To: [hidden email] > Sent: Thu, 11 February, 2010 11:51:57 > Subject: Fw: [SHADO] Re: my thoughts about the UFO movie.../WHICH > YEAR FOR UFO? > > I agree. I was surprised when they made Arthur Dent a black man in > the film version of "The Hitch-Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy." I > always thought of Arthur as white. There's political correctness for > you again. It was an understandable mistake setting UFO in 1980. > Maybe it should have been set in the year 2500 instead. Now there's > a question for all you UFO fans: > > Which year would you have ideally set "UFO" in? > > ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: Billy Killian <[hidden email]> > To: [hidden email] > Sent: Thu, 11 February, 2010 4:14:14 > Subject: Re: [SHADO] Re: my thoughts about the UFO movie.... > > > I think I have said it before but it still hold true and that is if > its not broke don't fix it. If as they say the love the original UFO > there is no need to put a new spin on a character by making them a > different Ethnic group or different hair color or age or what ever. > Since they are going to set this about ten years in the future which > is the same amount of time that the original UFO was set ahead they > can play around with the Tech and vehicle and craft designs and set > designs and even costuming to a certain degree. But when they start > making any changes to the characters it stops being UFO. > Oh, Denise, love the sight and stories. > James K. > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > From: Bruce Sherman <brucesherman@ sprintmail. com> > To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com > Sent: Wed, February 10, 2010 8:55:31 PM > Subject: Re: [SHADO] Re: my thoughts about the UFO movie... > > I don't know if Gene would have liked it all. Spock scoring with > Uhura?? He liked her for himself :) They dated if you didn't know, > Gene and Nichele. > > Bruce > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Neesierie > To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 7:36 PM > Subject: [SHADO] Re: my thoughts about the UFO movie... > > Anthony, > I quite agree. I have always hated remakes. They never seem to get > what made the original a hit needed to STAY a part of the show! That > said, I so totally enjoyed the remake of Star Trek that I'm hopeful > that UFO will have a similar miracle. I know some ST fans hated the > remake, but I'm a diehard fan myself and I laughed and laughed! Gene > would have loved it. So it could happen again -- for UFO this time. > We'll all find out one way or the other anyway, won't we? In just > about a year's time. > Yours, > Denise > > --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Anthony Smith <belmarbadboy@ ...> > wrote: > > > > > > See thats what I'm talking about--when you start changing the > color and genders of the characters of the show,it tends to ruin the > memory of the show(my personal opinion). By the way--I'm black and > not biased against color or gender for the record-just not for re- > makes of original shows or movies.Some things you just cant do like > that. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
>> Grant Wray said: UFO would HAVE to be set in the early to mid 80s. If it
was set today, they'd spend far too much time >> suppressing internet conspiracy theories. The whole secrecy gig would be up! I mean, imagine trying to >> hide all that Skydiver stuff with Google Earth? Um. Wow. So where would the secret base have to be? Deep underground below a respectable internet search company, one that has total control over the internet, one whose motto is, "Don't be evil". On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Grant Wray <[hidden email]>wrote: > UFO would HAVE to be set in the early to mid 80s. If it was set today, > they'd spend far too much time suppressing internet conspiracy > theories. The whole secrecy gig would be up! I mean, imagine trying to > hide all that Skydiver stuff with Google Earth? You'd have the black > helicopter brigade in fits! > > > On 11 Feb 2010, at 15:37, Brian Serridge wrote: > > > CORRECTION: Sorry, I meant Ford Prefect (not Arthur Dent). > > > > Best Wishes, > > > > BRIAN > > > > ----- Forwarded Message ---- > > From: Brian Serridge <[hidden email]> > > To: [hidden email] > > Sent: Thu, 11 February, 2010 11:51:57 > > Subject: Fw: [SHADO] Re: my thoughts about the UFO movie.../WHICH > > YEAR FOR UFO? > > > > I agree. I was surprised when they made Arthur Dent a black man in > > the film version of "The Hitch-Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy." I > > always thought of Arthur as white. There's political correctness for > > you again. It was an understandable mistake setting UFO in 1980. > > Maybe it should have been set in the year 2500 instead. Now there's > > a question for all you UFO fans: > > > > Which year would you have ideally set "UFO" in? > > > > ----- Forwarded Message ---- > > From: Billy Killian <[hidden email]> > > To: [hidden email] > > Sent: Thu, 11 February, 2010 4:14:14 > > Subject: Re: [SHADO] Re: my thoughts about the UFO movie.... > > > > > > I think I have said it before but it still hold true and that is if > > its not broke don't fix it. If as they say the love the original UFO > > there is no need to put a new spin on a character by making them a > > different Ethnic group or different hair color or age or what ever. > > Since they are going to set this about ten years in the future which > > is the same amount of time that the original UFO was set ahead they > > can play around with the Tech and vehicle and craft designs and set > > designs and even costuming to a certain degree. But when they start > > making any changes to the characters it stops being UFO. > > Oh, Denise, love the sight and stories. > > James K. > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > From: Bruce Sherman <brucesherman@ sprintmail. com> > > To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com > > Sent: Wed, February 10, 2010 8:55:31 PM > > Subject: Re: [SHADO] Re: my thoughts about the UFO movie... > > > > I don't know if Gene would have liked it all. Spock scoring with > > Uhura?? He liked her for himself :) They dated if you didn't know, > > Gene and Nichele. > > > > Bruce > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Neesierie > > To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com > > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 7:36 PM > > Subject: [SHADO] Re: my thoughts about the UFO movie... > > > > Anthony, > > I quite agree. I have always hated remakes. They never seem to get > > what made the original a hit needed to STAY a part of the show! That > > said, I so totally enjoyed the remake of Star Trek that I'm hopeful > > that UFO will have a similar miracle. I know some ST fans hated the > > remake, but I'm a diehard fan myself and I laughed and laughed! Gene > > would have loved it. So it could happen again -- for UFO this time. > > We'll all find out one way or the other anyway, won't we? In just > > about a year's time. > > Yours, > > Denise > > > > --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com, Anthony Smith <belmarbadboy@ ...> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > See thats what I'm talking about--when you start changing the > > color and genders of the characters of the show,it tends to ruin the > > memory of the show(my personal opinion). By the way--I'm black and > > not biased against color or gender for the record-just not for re- > > makes of original shows or movies.Some things you just cant do like > > that. > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
LOL. Perfect!
On 11/02/2010 17:44, david van brink wrote: > > >> Grant Wray said: UFO would HAVE to be set in the early to mid 80s. > If it > was set today, they'd spend far too much time > >> suppressing internet conspiracy theories. The whole secrecy gig > would be > up! I mean, imagine trying to > >> hide all that Skydiver stuff with Google Earth? > > Um. Wow. So where would the secret base have to be? Deep underground > below a > respectable internet search company, one that has total control over the > internet, one whose motto is, "Don't be evil". > ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |