I've joined this group, and would like to say hello to my new fellow
members! I've been a fan of 'U.F.O.' since it aired on BBC2 in the U.K. some years ago. I hadn't seen the show until then and was hooked, even though I only saw most of the second half. I bought some of the videotapes, and all the DVDs when those came out. 'U.F.O.' has become one of my favourite science-fiction TV series. Unlike other favourite series, however, I'm not influenced by childhood or teenage nostalgia. (I admit that this influences my liking of the present 'Dr. Who'.) Murray Smith |
Hello Murry, welcome.
I must admit that when I saw it here in Oz, back in the eighties, I had to laugh, that was their vision of the future? BWHAHAHHAH, it kills me, but I absolutely love the show, especially Michael. So you like The new Dr, or don't like him? Me, not to sure on the Scottish fella or the fact that their only 45 minute eps, but I totally fell for Christopher E, he was good. Nat Murray Smith wrote: >I've joined this group, and would like to say hello to my new fellow >members! I've been a fan of 'U.F.O.' since it aired on BBC2 in the U.K. >some years ago. I hadn't seen the show until then and was hooked, even >though I only saw most of the second half. I bought some of the videotapes, >and all the DVDs when those came out. > >'U.F.O.' has become one of my favourite science-fiction TV series. Unlike >other favourite series, however, I'm not influenced by childhood or teenage >nostalgia. (I admit that this influences my liking of the present 'Dr. Who'.) > > >Murray Smith > > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > |
Nat,
Thanks for your welcome. I'd like to give a few reasons, both serious and amusing, for why I like the show: 1. The idea of a government organisation covering up alien activity, as in 'The X-Files', but this time genuinely done for the good of people, is a refreshing change. I enjoy the efforts by those working for SHADO, from Ed Straker down, to keep the rest of the population from knowing the truth, including the use of an amnesia drug (anticipating 'Men in Black' by nearly two decades), and the resulting serious moral dilemmas that need to be confronted. (I like 'The Square Triangle' because of this, though the acting isn't up to much.) 2. The realistic portrayal of leadership in a large organisation like SHADO. Ed Straker is an obsessive workaholic, whose dedication to his duty cost him his marriage and his son's life. He is quite unlike the womanising James T. Kirk, who is almost always in the field, and gets away with such tactics because the writers make sure that he is always right. Compared to Kirk, Straker is unpleasant; but he is far more effective as a leader. He is quite prepared to stay in headquarters, letting his field commanders do the actual fighting; and, when he leaves for a break, he lets his second-in-command run things. (This is why 'The Responsibility Seat' is one of my favourite episodes.) It is this loyalty and trust that Straker not only demands from his people, but which he gives to them in return that establishes him as an effective leader. We also see him having to deal with bureaucratic and financial constraints, including the hostility of General Henderson, a former mentor now hostile to him for reasons never given. 3. The question of who the aliens are and what they want. This is something we're not sure about. We're not even sure what they really look like. Are they different aliens, who want different things from the Earth, or do they just change their minds a lot? As you need to properly know your enemy to properly defeat him, this lack of real knowledge is understandably frustrating for SHADO, and is shown in the series. 4. SID: I liked that computer and how it sounds like Zen in 'Blake's 7', another favourite sci-fi series of mine. 5. The clothes: Like other sci-fi series, 'U.F.O.' seemed to go for the 'nightclub' school of uniform design. I've laughed a lot at the wearing of purple wigs by female Moonbase personnel, and the string tops worn on board Skydiver! (That said, I like the Neru jackets on the men, and wouldn't mind wearing one myself.) >So you like The new Dr, or don't like him? Me, not to sure on the >Scottish fella or the fact that their only 45 minute eps, but I totally >fell for Christopher E, he was good. I like the new fellow so far, though I agree that his predecessor was good; it was a real pity they weren't able to keep him on. (I loved his explanation to Rose of why he spoke in a Northern accent!) When I said that my watching 'Dr. Who' was prejudiced by childhood nostalgia, I meant that, for a long time, I compared all the other Doctors to Tom Baker. Since watching other recorded episodes, I can be fairer to those others. Murray |
On Wed, 10 May 2006 19:16:58 +0100
Murray Smith <[hidden email]> wrote: > I enjoy the efforts by those working for SHADO, from Ed Straker down, > to keep the rest of the population from knowing the truth, including > the use of an amnesia drug (anticipating 'Men in Black' by nearly > two decades) Nearly three! Nice to have you here Murray. James -- Dig It : a forum for Beatles fans - http://beatles.dyndns.org/ |
In reply to this post by Murray Smith
Murray Smith wrote:
>Nat, > >Thanks for your welcome. I'd like to give a few reasons, both serious and >amusing, for why I like the show: > >1. The idea of a government organisation covering up alien activity, as in >'The X-Files', but this time genuinely done for the good of people, is a >refreshing change. I enjoy the efforts by those working for SHADO, from Ed >Straker down, to keep the rest of the population from knowing the truth, >including the use of an amnesia drug (anticipating 'Men in Black' by nearly >two decades), and the resulting serious moral dilemmas that need to be >confronted. (I like 'The Square Triangle' because of this, though the >acting isn't up to much.) > > Haven't seen the Square Triangle yet, but I hope to watch it later this afternoon. A Question of Priorities was a good one, I'm sorry he had to loose his son though. >2. The realistic portrayal of leadership in a large organisation like >SHADO. Ed Straker is an obsessive workaholic, whose dedication to his duty >cost him his marriage and his son's life. He is quite unlike the womanising >James T. Kirk, who is almost always in the field, and gets away with such >tactics because the writers make sure that he is always right. > >Compared to Kirk, Straker is unpleasant; but he is far more effective as a >leader. He is quite prepared to stay in headquarters, letting his field >commanders do the actual fighting; and, when he leaves for a break, he lets >his second-in-command run things. (This is why 'The Responsibility Seat' is >one of my favourite episodes.) It is this loyalty and trust that Straker >not only demands from his people, but which he gives to them in return that >establishes him as an effective leader. We also see him having to deal with >bureaucratic and financial constraints, including the hostility of General >Henderson, a former mentor now hostile to him for reasons never given. > > 'abrasiveness' is what makes him a more believable character myself. I have yet to watch the Resposiibility Seat, I have the videos, curtesy of a friend of my boyfriends. Kirk was too goody/goody, very much the Americian ideal of a hero. >3. The question of who the aliens are and what they want. This is something >we're not sure about. We're not even sure what they really look like. Are >they different aliens, who want different things from the Earth, or do they >just change their minds a lot? As you need to properly know your enemy to >properly defeat him, this lack of real knowledge is understandably >frustrating for SHADO, and is shown in the series. > > Yes, it a pity that they weren't able to more fully realise this. The aliens, I felt, could have been a little more different, I suppose, there was definately something missing in their make up (no pun intended). >4. SID: I liked that computer and how it sounds like Zen in 'Blake's 7', >another favourite sci-fi series of mine. > > Yes, Peter Tuddenham did the voices for all the computers in both series. I think he did a good job. >5. The clothes: Like other sci-fi series, 'U.F.O.' seemed to go for the >'nightclub' school of uniform design. I've laughed a lot at the wearing of >purple wigs by female Moonbase personnel, and the string tops worn on board >Skydiver! (That said, I like the Neru jackets on the men, and wouldn't mind >wearing one myself.) > > Personally, I like those wigs, I don't have the figure for the uniforms, but the wigs are cool. I to like their fashiom sense, who says that a uniform has to be drab and boring. As for the fishnet shirts, they look sort of all right on men, but on the women, *cringe* I think that Sylvia should go back to fashion school for that one. Nat > > >>So you like The new Dr, or don't like him? Me, not to sure on the >>Scottish fella or the fact that their only 45 minute eps, but I totally >>fell for Christopher E, he was good. >> >> > >I like the new fellow so far, though I agree that his predecessor was good; >it was a real pity they weren't able to keep him on. (I loved his >explanation to Rose of why he spoke in a Northern accent!) When I said that >my watching 'Dr. Who' was prejudiced by childhood nostalgia, I meant that, >for a long time, I compared all the other Doctors to Tom Baker. Since >watching other recorded episodes, I can be fairer to those others. > > >Murray > > > > > > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > |
I think the costuming had a definite Italian Sci-Fi
flavor to the more exotic fare ... <g> Oh yeah, years of bad Italian Sci-Fi LOL. But then, even with bad effects and "night club" costuming, they were at least trying ....... <g> and were never at loss for plots and snappy lines --- which probably suffered badly in translation <laughter>. Personally, I always had a problem with the Responsibility Seat ... (weakness for happy endings and why weren't Mary's current husband and the doctor moving heaven and earth to help the kid???? I mean, movie moguls have more medical pull than doctors???? OK, the writers missed several good ways of making the aliens more evil here <laughter>) Even at 18 I knew there was something intrinsically wrong with leaving it all in Straker's capable but sometimes constrained hands. Logic loopholes! Still, it was a refreshingly dark little show with highlights of light (unlike one of my other favorite shows where the humans could not win the first season ... LOL ... War of the Worlds) back to lurkerdom (semester is finished, brain recuperating) dragon __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
In reply to this post by James Gibbon
James and Nat,
Thanks for your replies. You're right, James; 'Men in Black' was nearly _three_ decades later. :) Nat, I'll be interested in reading what you have to say about 'The Square Triangle'; because I think that the plot is excellent, particularly the conclusion, which I won't give away. :) I don't rate it as high as I could, however, because of the guest stars' acting. I'd certainly urge you to watch 'The Responsibility Seat', because it encapsulates the SHADO idea of 'realistic' leadership, Alec Freeman and Paul Foster having to deal with a crisis while Straker is away. In terms of the Kirk idea of leadership, when 'Star Trek: The Next Generation' began, the idea was to have Jean-Luc Picard stay on board ship, while Will Riker would do the heroic stuff on the relevant planet, something that didn't last long. I agree that it was a pity there was not more time to find out about the aliens and what they wanted. It reminded me of the series 'Odyssey 5', which stopped after one season, at the end of which things were starting to make sense. I saw Peter Tuddenham at a convention some years ago. He was very nice, and gave us all a taste of his computer voice. :) I know the purple wigs are silly; but I suppose they're no more silly than horsehair wigs on the heads of some judges. How does one try to explain that strange Earth custom to an alien? :) Murray |
hi i think that's why i like U.F.O i like the idea of
an organisation set up to combat alien threats. One of my friends got me into watching U.F.O. So glad i bought the Carlton boxsets. the first episode of U.F.O i ever saw was Sub-Smash. Great story. on the carlton boxset i watched Sub Smash with the commentary on. very entertaining commentary by the late Ed Bishop Andrew --- Murray Smith <[hidden email]> wrote: > James and Nat, > > Thanks for your replies. You're right, James; 'Men > in Black' was nearly > _three_ decades later. :) > > Nat, I'll be interested in reading what you have to > say about 'The Square > Triangle'; because I think that the plot is > excellent, particularly the > conclusion, which I won't give away. :) I don't rate > it as high as I could, > however, because of the guest stars' acting. > > I'd certainly urge you to watch 'The Responsibility > Seat', because it > encapsulates the SHADO idea of 'realistic' > leadership, Alec Freeman and > Paul Foster having to deal with a crisis while > Straker is away. In terms of > the Kirk idea of leadership, when 'Star Trek: The > Next Generation' began, > the idea was to have Jean-Luc Picard stay on board > ship, while Will Riker > would do the heroic stuff on the relevant planet, > something that didn't > last long. > > I agree that it was a pity there was not more time > to find out about the > aliens and what they wanted. It reminded me of the > series 'Odyssey 5', > which stopped after one season, at the end of which > things were starting to > make sense. > > I saw Peter Tuddenham at a convention some years > ago. He was very nice, and > gave us all a taste of his computer voice. :) > > I know the purple wigs are silly; but I suppose > they're no more silly than > horsehair wigs on the heads of some judges. How does > one try to explain > that strange Earth custom to an alien? :) > > > Murray > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > [hidden email] > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ 24 FIFA World Cup tickets to be won with Yahoo! Mail http://uk.mail.yahoo.com |
In reply to this post by Sallie Loftin
Sallie and Andrew,
First, hello to you both! >Oh yeah, years of bad Italian Sci-Fi LOL. But then, >even with bad effects and "night club" costuming, they >were at least trying ....... <g> and were never at >loss for plots and snappy lines --- which probably >suffered badly in translation <laughter>. I can't make any judgement about bad Italian sci-fi, I'm afraid. :) But I do agree that 'U.F.O.' was 'never at a loss for plots and snappy lines'. I also can't offer any comment about the quality of the translation into Italian. :) >Personally, I always had a problem with the >Responsibility Seat ... (weakness for happy endings >and why weren't Mary's current husband and the doctor >moving heaven and earth to help the kid???? I mean, >movie moguls have more medical pull than doctors???? >OK, the writers missed several good ways of making the >aliens more evil here <laughter>) Even at 18 I knew >there was something intrinsically wrong with leaving >it all in Straker's capable but sometimes constrained >hands. Logic loopholes! I think you mean the episode 'A Question of Priorities'. Like you, I wondered when I saw it why Mary's second husband and the doctor weren't pulling more strings. Also, why weren't the U.K.'s tabloid newspapers having a field day: MOVIE MOGUL LETS SON DIE! >Still, it was a refreshingly dark little show with >highlights of light (unlike one of my other favorite >shows where the humans could not win the first season >... LOL ... War of the Worlds) The series ended in the middle of a war, with the humans fighting back. But there still was a lack of intelligence in terms of who the aliens were and what they wanted. Without proper intelligence, I don't see how the humans can really defeat them. >back to lurkerdom (semester is finished, brain >recuperating) Good luck with the recuperation! Andrew, like you 'Sub-Smash' was the first 'U.F.O.' episode I saw. :) Murray |
As far as UFO episodes are concerned - apart from some lines such as "these
clouds give as much cover as a g-string on a belly dancer" whose literal translation in Italian wouldn't make sense - the Italian dubbers did a good job (as they usually do, I'm told). If you could speak Italian and could compare the original UFO episodes dialogues with the Italian dubbing of the five Italian UFO film-compilations (see www.isoshado.org , Historical Researches, From TV to Cinema) you would find it funny sometimes. The Italian dubbing of UFO episode A Cat With Ten Lives, for example, does not literally translates "sitting duck" while one of the movie-compilations does ("anatra seduta") and this is nonsense in Italian. teresa ISOSHADO ----- Original Message ----- > I can't make any judgement about bad Italian sci-fi, I'm afraid. :) But I > do agree that 'U.F.O.' was 'never at a loss for plots and snappy lines'. I > also can't offer any comment about the quality of the translation into > Italian. :) |
In reply to this post by Murray Smith
Teressa Babel Fish translates Anatra Seduta as duck seated not nonsense.
Translations never some out exactly as the original because the ideas and concepts of difference languages and cultures differ so. James K. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Murray Smith
> I think you mean the episode 'A Question of
> Priorities'. LOL --- ep titles tend to elude me <g> <<Like you, I > wondered when I saw it why Mary's second husband and > the doctor weren't > pulling more strings. Also, why weren't the U.K.'s > tabloid newspapers > having a field day: MOVIE MOGUL LETS SON DIE!>> Oh, yeah ... well, yeah ... Mary, tabloid ... could have milked it for all it was worth .... mind you, the fact that they wouldn't be able to trace the shipment past the pick up point, if there .... oh, my heavens .. . <claps hand to forehead> I feel a fan fic coming on! eeeek! > The series ended in the middle of a war, with the > humans fighting back. But > there still was a lack of intelligence in terms of > who the aliens were and > what they wanted. Without proper intelligence, I > don't see how the humans > can really defeat them. UFO did, WotW actually ended with a truce. Although how the US was gonna recover ...... <g>. As far as UFO went, attrition could possibly take out the aliens if our idea that they were an aging and headed for extinction race. > Good luck with the recuperation! Recuperation working. Wrapped "100MPG" Wednesday night and pulled A's in both my other classes ....... I am done until August! <dragon doing handsprings> LOL ("100MPG" is a short film my class was doing for submission to the Sundance Film Festival. <g>) laters dragon __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
In reply to this post by teresa.cerana
<chuckle>
Mind you, this brings to mind the experiment they did back in the 70's attempting to promote understanding between the USSR and the US. Out of sight, out of mind translated into russian and then back became: Invisible insanity. <g> Idiom does not really translate unless you understand the meaning of the terms to begin with which even the Babel Fish translator doesn't. "duck seated" to which one logically replies: so? huh? what? dragon --- Teresa - ISOSHADO <[hidden email]> wrote: > As far as UFO episodes are concerned - apart from > some lines such as "these > clouds give as much cover as a g-string on a belly > dancer" whose literal > translation in Italian wouldn't make sense - the > Italian dubbers did a good > job (as they usually do, I'm told). > > If you could speak Italian and could compare the > original UFO episodes > dialogues with the Italian dubbing of the five > Italian UFO film-compilations > (see www.isoshado.org , Historical Researches, From > TV to Cinema) > you would find it funny sometimes. > The Italian dubbing of UFO episode A Cat With Ten > Lives, for example, does > not literally translates "sitting duck" while one of > the movie-compilations > does ("anatra seduta") and this is nonsense in > Italian. > > teresa > ISOSHADO > > ----- Original Message ----- > > I can't make any judgement about bad Italian > sci-fi, I'm afraid. :) But I > > do agree that 'U.F.O.' was 'never at a loss for > plots and snappy lines'. I > > also can't offer any comment about the quality of > the translation into > > Italian. :) > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > [hidden email] > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
In reply to this post by SumitonJD
That's exactly what I meant.
teresa ----- Original Message ----- > Translations never some out exactly as the original because the ideas and > concepts of difference languages and cultures differ so. > > James K. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |