Just as an aside, I've always felt it was harder for British actors, or for that matter, Canadian and American actors working IN Britain, to get the attention and kudus they deserved. Even greats like Lawrence Olivier and Vivien Leigh had to really make their mark on the stage, as opposed to film. When Olivier was playing the lead in "Wuthering Heights" he was referred to as that "ugly actor" by the MGM studio boss. His stage acting was considered laughable on film. Vivien won two Academy Awards (for GWTW and Streetcar Named Desire), but other greats like Richard Burton were nominated many times and came up empty handed. Much as I hate to say this - Hollywood and the Californian film industry seems to be the Holy Grail of moviedom. Those who work in other countries DO NOT get any kind of consideration. Even the great Orson Welles turned to other nations and foreign backers to get the $ he needed for his later films. His genius was first recognized overseas - the American film industry was so aghast at his talent - and so jealous -that they passed him off time and time again. Returning to the subject of UFO actors and actresses - they have been most unfortunate in that UFO was made in Britain - and just before the sci-fic film/TV popularity explosion took place only a few yrs later with the syndication success of Trek and such blockbuster films as Star Wars etc. Don't forget, Star Wars itself was not expected to do well at the box office. It was as much of a sleeper surprise to Lucas as it was to the general public. Maybe if UFO had been made around that time frame, the actors and actresses would have gotten much more exposure and that would have upped the ante on their careers both inside and outside of Britain. Let's face it - Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher and Mark Hammill were MADE by Star Wars. Who had ever heard of them before that film came out? Ford was the only one who'd done any creditable work prior to that, but most of it was TV eps in guest starring roles (i.e. Bonanza, etc). The others were relative newcomers who burst onto the world stage because of SW. Even after the film and its sequels were history, the one whose career took off was Harrison Ford. Carrie writes books and gets divorces, and Mark Hammill does mostly voice over work for documentaries and the odd personal appearance on TV shows (i.e. the Outer Limits and Just Shoot Me). So I guess my point here is to say that Fisher, Ford and Hammill had an opportunity tailor-made for them that the UFO people didn't get - and certainly, Ed B. and Mike B are no worse than Mark Hamill as actors. They probably are better because they've had more training and work over their careers. And, I've always felt Mike B.'s deprecating attitude to his own work spurred him to go to the Actors' Studio in NYC to get better. To learn his craft. In that, he's in fine company - the Actors' Studio also turned out such people as Marlon Brando, Eli Wallach, Paul Newman, Marilyn Monroe. Pam |
Banned User
|
This post was updated on .
In reply to this post by jamesgibbon
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
In reply to this post by BedsitterOne
> << I wonder whether James would have seen Ed Bishop as Willy Loman in
> Arthur Miller's 'Death of a Salesman', during his two years at the > National Theatre ? >> > I would have KILLED to see him as Loman. WHINE!!! I knew he did a lot of > Miller plays but that one, siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiggggggggggghhhhhhhhh. I > am depressed now <g> Yeah I would have loved to have seen that! He was excellent in Strike Gently Away From Body when I saw him at the Young Vic twice! > > Just to hear *that* voice live on stage. He is wonderful in a stage poduction. > > Damn electric. > > Amelia <biased and proud of it > Me too! Sheila Ed Bishopophile |
In reply to this post by SumitonJD
> Wait a minute Amelia, are you saying that Ed and Suzanne Neve are in the > first film version of Portrait of a Lady together? > > James Killian wrote the above Yes they are and it was just before UFO. She rejects him in this too..LOL! BTW I am with you James on this thing about UFO actors acting ability..don't care what anybody else says. Sheila Still UFO Crazy crazy crazy crrraaazzzzy! |
In reply to this post by jamesgibbon
Actually the BBC version was the one I meant. Perhaps I should have said TV
movies to make it clear I did not mean the one of a few years ago with Nicole Kidman in the lead. James K. |
In reply to this post by jamesgibbon
Thanks for the support. And thanks for the info on the film. I'm always
looking for new stuff that the UFO cast has been in for my Video Raiders articles and this will be a new one for Ed although I knew Suzanne had starred in it the dumb reviewers at IMDB had not other cast listed. Weren't you looking for someone who had seen Vampire Circus? James K. |
In reply to this post by Anny Théberge
In message <00a901c0f225$4a7d20c0$5d7fd1d8@ordinateur>, Anny Theberge
<[hidden email]> writes <snip> > >--La Petite Anny :-) ><who likes the actors and how they acted (with much subtlety, in his >Bishopness' case) in the series or she wouldn't even still be watching the >thing after more than 30 years because UFO's more than the sum of errors one >can find within it.) ><wise nod> > Thank you, Anny, I could not have put it better myself;-) LOL!!! -- Suzanne Sutherland La Grande |
In reply to this post by Pam McCaughey
In message <[hidden email]>, Pam McCaughey
<[hidden email]> writes >Much as I like Tom Hanks, I HAD to LOL at your comment! I feel the same way >about John Revolta and Matthew Broderick....However, I can sit through Ed B >and Mike B. anytime. I agree Vladek Sheybal was a fine actor, but he was >often shown as a rather nasty man in UFO. Actually, there is a man in my >building who looks remarkably like Mr. Sheybal! > Really??? Do tell!! -- Suzanne Sutherland aka drdougjackson |
In reply to this post by BedsitterOne
In message <[hidden email]>, [hidden email] writes
> >And Ed is nail bitingly handsome in this, ladies <chuckles> As usual! He >basically looks wounded and pines away for Suzanne's character. <grin> > And so he should;-) I have lots of character! And, yes, I have seen this on video and he is quite dashing but there isn't enough of him in the story. Richard Chamberlain is excessively annoying in this production, too. -- SuzannEd Sutherland |
In reply to this post by BedsitterOne
Hi Amelia,
<<Just to hear *that* voice (Ed Bishop's)live on stage. Damn electric.>> The voice reference makes me think of Ed's radio work, particularly his starring in several 1977 BBC Radio dramatisations of Raymond Chandler's 'Philip Marlowe' private eye novels, set in Los Angeles in the late 1930s-early 40s. (Published on tape in 1999 and still available, eg from Amazon). He has an ideal voice for it, playing the slightly world-weary, outwardly cynical but inwardly decent detective to perfection. Regards, Andy ____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie |
In reply to this post by Yuchtar-2
--- In SHADO@y..., Yuchtar <yuchtr@e...> wrote:
> andy_lovie@y... wrote: > > > Mike B. certainly wasn't happy at the time with his acting on 'UFO' - saying that he felt immediately after the series he might never get offered work again ! - but personally, I feel that to be far too self-critical. His portrayal of the Foster character had, as others have said, an intensity which made it a creditable performance... > >(Yuchtar) it's possible he meant that he was afraid he would be type- casted and never be offered anything other than sci-fi stuff again. That happens a lot with shows like that.>> On reflection, I'm sure you're right, type-casting rather than the quality of his acting was his concern regarding finding acting work after 'UFO'. Regards, Andy |
In reply to this post by andy_lovie
In message <[hidden email]>, Andy
Lovie <[hidden email]> writes >Hi Amelia, > ><<Just to hear *that* voice (Ed Bishop's)live on >stage. > >Damn electric.>> > >The voice reference makes me think of Ed's radio work, >particularly his starring in several 1977 BBC Radio >dramatisations of Raymond Chandler's 'Philip Marlowe' >private eye novels, set in Los Angeles in the late >1930s-early 40s. (Published on tape in 1999 and still >available, eg from Amazon). > >He has an ideal voice for it, playing the slightly >world-weary, outwardly cynical but inwardly decent >detective to perfection. > Ed *is* Philip Marlowe. The part must have been made in Heaven for him. -- SuzannEd Sutherland |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |