Original Message: From: "Dandello" [hidden email] Subject: RE: [SHADO] Re: Mary's place in the scheme of things - Look again, dear - SHADO was built beneath an existing film studio - Britain had a surplus of bust studios in the early 70's and was practically GIVING them away. Allowing a new studio to be built when most of the others were looking at bankruptcy would have raised a lot more questions than putting a big hole in the ground for SHADO HQ. Deborah ****************************************************** Actually, SHADO *was not* built beneath an existing studio. If you watch the episode, they built the whole thing from scratch; the studio, plus blocks of surrounding govenment office buildings. They refer to that several times in the episode. : ) Dave H. __________|__________ ___\____(*)____/___ o/ \o [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
The episode refers to an 'office block' being just finished - NOT the
studio buildings or the studio itself. The only other statement made in the episode was something to the effect that the office space was to go to the government. (Probably 'Internal Revenue') The questions raised by anyone building a film studio in Britain in between 1967-75 when most other studios with modern facilities where going bankrupt would have shut the project down. We wouldn't be talking about just one questioning reporter but hundreds of them. The impending failure to the British film industry was a major and ongoing news story. New studio constuction in this climate? - They may as well have simply posted a sign SECRET GOVERNMENT PROJECT HERE. SHADO security is supposed to be bright. At the time the episode was written a major film studio (one of the MGM properties, I think) had just changed hands for a pittance and was in serious danger of being shut down for good. If the writers were not aware of this, they were living in a hole. Besides - the HS office building shown was NOT built in 1970, as any student of architecture or building details can tell you. That's a late 50's, early 60's, construction. And don't even think about trying the tack that they built it to look that way. Deborah -----Original Message----- From: davrecon [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 10:15 AM To: UFO discussion group Subject: [SHADO] SHADO beneath existing studio?... Original Message: From: "Dandello" [hidden email] Subject: RE: [SHADO] Re: Mary's place in the scheme of things - Look again, dear - SHADO was built beneath an existing film studio - Britain had a surplus of bust studios in the early 70's and was practically GIVING them away. Allowing a new studio to be built when most of the others were looking at bankruptcy would have raised a lot more questions than putting a big hole in the ground for SHADO HQ. Deborah ****************************************************** Actually, SHADO *was not* built beneath an existing studio. If you watch the episode, they built the whole thing from scratch; the studio, plus blocks of surrounding govenment office buildings. They refer to that several times in the episode. : ) Dave H. __________|__________ ___\____(*)____/___ o/ \o [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
"Dandello" wrote:
> At the time the episode was written a major film studio > (one of the MGM properties, I think) had just changed hands > for a pittance and was in serious danger of being shut down > for good. If the writers were not aware of this, they were > living in a hole. > Whether they were aware of it is not really relevant - we might as well ask ourselves if they were aware that it's not really feasible for the front end of a submarine to be used as a fighter aircraft. I don't really think that they intended to be constrained by real life considerations such as this. > Besides - the HS office building shown was NOT built in 1970, > as any student of architecture or building details can tell > you. That's a late 50's, early 60's, construction. And don't > even think about trying the tack that they built it to look > that way. > OK, but the fact is that they wanted to use the existing 'real life' studio building for filming. James |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |