I have to concur with AT, I don't really understand the comment. For a
kit with 30 year plus old moulds, the moulding quality is fine. As
the kit that has largely been out of production for that period [ie
the moulds hav'nt been over used] it is better moulded than many a kit
from the era. I believe it got to a point were the original 70's issue
was [maybe still is for all I know] changing hands for a couple
thousand pounds.
If the comment refers to the toy like elements - well there is nothing
one can do about that :-)
Marty...........
--- In SHADO@y..., highcotton51@m... wrote:
> Marc Martin wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just got an e-mail from someone in Japan who tells
> > me that the UFO kit which is currently being offered
> > is a "poorly produced kit", so I guess potential buyers
> > should be aware of this. Has anyone purchased this kit?
> > Note that this is not the IMAI kit, but the company
> > which purchased the molds to the IMAI kit.
>
> Marc-
> It is produced from the same molds, and Aoshima produces kits about
the
> same quality or better than Imai used to, so I amnot sure how worse
it
> could be...
> AT
Locked
