Hi Everyone
Charles Bender, the producer of Solaris (2002), has his eye on a remake of the 1970s Anderson live-action series UFO ... This doesn't neccesarily mean that Bender is going to make a UFO movie ... being an actor myself, and knowing a little about the business, I would hazard a guess that Bender may try and option the rights to make UFO into a movie. The reason? Bender and other Hollywood film producers will no doubt be interested in seeing how the Thunderbirds movie does at the box office in 2004. If the movie is successful, then Bender will probably have bought the rights to UFO fairly cheaply and will possibly be able to get financing to do a UFO movie because of Thunderbirds' success. If Thunderbirds flops, then Bender hasn't crippled himself developing a UFO movie, he may sell the rights and look at making other movies. Expect to see other producers & studios optioning the rights to other Anderson shows in the coming months ... if Thunderbirds is the next big thing, Universal's competitors will be keen to cash in on it's success by making movies of, for example, UFO. Notice how other studios brought out their own Marvel Superheroes movies after the success of X Men - they waited to see if X Men would be successful and when it was they made their own movies like Spider-Man, Daredevil and The Hulk. Also on the subject of a UFO movie, don't expect to see a film that carries on from the original series or features the original cast a la Star Trek. Yes, Ed Bishop IS Ed Straker but unfortunately Ed's name isn't well known enough to open a movie worldwide. If I was casting Ed in a UFO movie, I would cast him as General Henderson, I think it would make for quite an ironic cameo. I also think Mike Billington would be great as Bill Kofax, the guy who fires Foster from Ventura in 'Exposed'. Unfortunately, I think the original UFO cast would now be too old to play their original roles, many of them have sadly died, many of them have faded into obscurity and no longer act and many of them wouldn't be easily recognisable as their original characters. A UFO movie made just for the fans would be a disaster ... a successful UFO movie needs to appeal to it's fans but also to attract a new audience so that it can be commercially successful at the box office. It also needs to be recognisable as UFO but it also needs to be a little bit different too. If I was making a UFO movie, I would tell the story from the beginning and I would use the very best bits of 'Identified' and 'Exposed'. I wouldn't feature Peter Carlin - what was the point of introducing him as a main character in 'Identified' and then doing nothing with him? Yes, I know that Peter Gordeno was advised by his agent only to do so many episodes, but really that's something that should've been sorted out before the series was made ... look at other early episodes, in which Freeman & Bradley were hinted at being the main character. If you made a film of UFO and introduced the Carlin character and then dropped him, the audience would lose interest in the film. I would have Foster as one of the main characters, I would also have Carlin as his co-pilot in the XV-104. When Carlin dies, his sister Leila turns up & asks Foster lots of questions a la Janna Wade. In the pre-credits sequence of my UFO movie, I would have Leila Carlin taking photos of the UFO in the woods like in 'Exposed' and end the scene with her screaming as the Alien approaches her. Before the XV-104 flight, Carlin, looking at a photo of Leila, tells Foster that she's been missing presumed dead for 10 years. So when she turns up at Foster's appartment, the audience is thinking "She's supposed to be dead! What if the Aliens have taken her over?" whereas Foster is oblivious to the danger he might be in - this would create suspense! Actually, Leila, like Janna Wade, is the Head of Project Foster, the SHADO operation put into action when Foster starts snooping around SHADO - but is she? Later in the movie, she is injured when an Alien is captured and, comparing her DNA with the Alien's, Jackson discovers that they are one and the same! Thus, we have our central villain or villainess, many UFO episodes featured human beings that were taken over by the Aliens so this would continue to uphold that tradition. The problem with doing a UFO movie that tells the story from the beginning is that sometimes those sort of movies don't work, for example, Lost In Space or The Avengers, in that they're telling a story that people know already and sometimes it's not as good as what it was or how they remember it. If it's done really well, like Star Wars, Superman, or X Men, then the second film is always better because the 'Universe' has been established in the first. Finally, I would like to see a UFO movie that captures the look and production design of the original as it was very distinctive. I would also like to see a lot of model-based sfx as the original sfx still stands up really well. I found Lost In Space disappointing because they made it look like a faceless copy of something like Event Horizon. If anything, Mars Attacks! and The Fifth Element have more of a look inspired by UFO. I'm sure I may have stirred up a hornet's nest with some of my comments but I'm interested in knowing what other UFO fans think of my comments! Neil P.S The signs are good ... I spoke to someone on Friday who saw the Thunderbird 2 Hangar under construction at Pinewood, with all the various pods that go in TB2 on show, and he says it looks fantastic! __________________________________________________ Yahoo! Plus For a better Internet experience http://www.yahoo.co.uk/btoffer |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |