I am greatly excited- all I have had for UFO viewing is about 16 of the 26 episodes that were poorly dubbed VHSs- but Santa has the DVD complete box set coming. ACK! Question; How is it that Sky1 could blast off from Skydiver and not have the Diver part get torched by the blast? Why is it the Interceptors only had one missle, and no lazers or anything? Couldn't the aliens just send ten saucers at once? Ten saucers--three missles. You do the math. Couldn't the aliens ever decided to shoot SID? Wouldn't have that been a tactical advantage for them? Didn't SID show up on radar on Earth? And can't Moonbase be detected from Earth? Anyway, that's it. |
To answer your questions. 1. I never figured that one out myself but one of our tech guys or gals will get back to you. 2. Gerry Anderson once said that the missile was supposed to be composed of several smaller missiles sort of like a fragment grenade. You see one missile go but several hits are made. 3. The Aliens did shoot down SID one time. The Man Who Came BAck was the title of the episode. Moonbase was not as secret as it should have been. I cant remember the name of the episode but another research group was on the moon once and one time a moon mobile from Russia was on a collision course with Moonbase because the astronauts running it were suffering from oxygen deprivation. I think it was called the Dalotek Affair. But you also have to realise that just knowing about a moonbase doesn't mean it would be easy to find it. All of this is from memory so I could be wrong. People in this club dont hesitate to correct . I just got the New Avengers on DVD with Purdey
and Gambit. The actor who played Dr Jackson was the villain. He could control birds through music. Very cool episode. Brinke <[hidden email]> wrote: I am greatly excited- all I have had for UFO viewing is about 16 of the 26 episodes that were poorly dubbed VHSs- but Santa has the DVD complete box set coming. ACK! Question; How is it that Sky1 could blast off from Skydiver and not have the Diver part get torched by the blast? Why is it the Interceptors only had one missle, and no lazers or anything? Couldn't the aliens just send ten saucers at once? Ten saucers--three missles. You do the math. Couldn't the aliens ever decided to shoot SID? Wouldn't have that been a tactical advantage for them? Didn't SID show up on radar on Earth? And can't Moonbase be detected from Earth? Anyway, that's it. Yahoo! Groups Links signature test'; "> --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Send holiday email and support a worthy cause. Do good. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by brinkeguthrie
--- Brinke <[hidden email]> wrote: > Question; > How is it that Sky1 could blast off from Skydiver > and not have the > Diver part get torched by the blast? Aircraft carriers have a hinge that absorbs the prop blast of jets that are about to take off. In the world of UFO, maybe the material and the concept is similar. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail |
In reply to this post by brinkeguthrie
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brinke" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 10:05 PM Subject: [SHADO] Various > > > > I am greatly excited- all I have had for UFO viewing is about 16 of > the 26 episodes that were poorly dubbed VHSs- but Santa has the DVD > complete box set coming. ACK! > > Question; > How is it that Sky1 could blast off from Skydiver and not have the > Diver part get torched by the blast? > > ------------------------------------------------------------- Even more interesting, is how we see smoke from the rockets drifting lazily about underwater, and no appearent bubbles of rocket exhaust gasses roiling up to the surface afterwards.... Dave H. |
Good point. Although I suppose there was no way to address the "lazy smoke" anomaly without actually shooting the launch underwater back in 1970. No computer generated effects back in the stone age. How times have changed... Jeff davrecon <[hidden email]> wrote: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brinke" To: Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 10:05 PM Subject: [SHADO] Various > > > > I am greatly excited- all I have had for UFO viewing is about 16 of > the 26 episodes that were poorly dubbed VHSs- but Santa has the DVD > complete box set coming. ACK! > > Question; > How is it that Sky1 could blast off from Skydiver and not have the > Diver part get torched by the blast? > > ------------------------------------------------------------- Even more interesting, is how we see smoke from the rockets drifting lazily about underwater, and no appearent bubbles of rocket exhaust gasses roiling up to the surface afterwards.... Dave H. Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by brinkeguthrie
The rockets that propel Sky1 from Diver most likely Diver would have to have some type of pressure relief system. The rockets would ignite and build up thrust and pressure. When the pressure reaches a certain level bulkheads would open and allow the force to travel thru a passage or tunnel thru Diver while Sky1 was contuning to accelerate and gain momention to travel under water and gain enough speed to jump into the air and have the engines ignite and continue flying. Steve Christensen Question; > > How is it that Sky1 could blast off from Skydiver and not have the > > Diver part get torched by the blast? > > |
In reply to this post by brinkeguthrie
--- In [hidden email], "Brinke" <brinkeguthrie@y...> wrote: > Question; > How is it that Sky1 could blast off from Skydiver and not have the > Diver part get torched by the blast? That's been covered in other posts, I won't add to that discussion here. > > Why is it the Interceptors only had one missle, and no lazers or > anything? Couldn't the aliens just send ten saucers at once? Ten > saucers--three missles. You do the math. According to the production notes, the missile was designed to split into 10 mini missiles which would explode and cover a wide area. One of the ideas Anderson and co. had was that in space the speeds of the UFO's would be so great a directed weapon such as lasers and cannon wouldn't be much use. In the show, Moonbase would track the trajectory and speed of the UFO and compute a firing range and time for the missiles. The missiles would home in on a area where the UFO is predicted to be and then explode, covering a wide area and hopefully engulfing the alien. Only in "Cat With 10 Lives" do we see an interceptor missile directly hitting a UFO (the hint being that it was almost a point blank shot) and in "ESP" we see how a UFO on a wildly erratic course evades the Interceptor missiles. The interceptors are not designed for dogfighting; that's what Sky 1 is for. > > Couldn't the aliens ever decided to shoot SID? Wouldn't have that > been a tactical advantage for them? Didn't SID show up on radar on > Earth? And can't Moonbase be detected from Earth? On the first point, that's a perfectly valid tactic that the aliens don't use in the show, but no doubt a piece of fan fiction would have that scenario happen. However, SID picks up information from probes at the edge of the solar system (see "Reflections in the Water") and helps Moonbase to predict UFO trajectory. If SID was seen to be the target of an attack, it would predict this and the UFO's would still have to avoid the Interceptors. We have no information as to whether SID itself has its own defences. SID might show up on Earth radar, but civilian radar might just think it's another satellite or space station and the governments of the world know all about SHADO anyway. Likewise, most civilians working on the Moon know about Moonbase, but think it's just a UN military base (see "Dalotek Affair" and "The Responsibility Seat" for more information). Moonbase has a 50 mile exclusion zone around it where civilian mining concerns can't enter. I hope these bits of information are of some help. Nick |
In reply to this post by bryan legg
> Brinke <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Question; > How is it that Sky1 could blast off from Skydiver and not have the > Diver part get torched by the blast? > Why is it the Interceptors only had one missle, and no lazers or > anything? Couldn't the aliens just send ten saucers at once? Ten > saucers--three missles. You do the math. > Couldn't the aliens ever decided to shoot SID? Wouldn't have that > been a tactical advantage for them? Didn't SID show up on radar on > Earth? And can't Moonbase be detected from Earth? I suspect we may never know the answers to your questions but I will hazard a guess. In order: it's only a TV series, it's only a TV series, it's only a TV series, it's only a TV series, it's only a TV series, it's only a TV series, it's only a TV series. :) Things I've always wanted to know: how did the interceptors turn round? why did the SkyDiver crew wear string vests? why did SHADO vehicles have "SHADO" written on them when it was supposed to be a secret organisation? How could there be a SHADO but no ADO? why didn't the male moon operatives wear purple wigs? why did the UFOs make a noise in space? as alien technology was clearly vastly superior to earth technology how could we be so successful in repelling them (surely death rays would easily have defeated missiles)? I suspect the answer to all of these will also be it's only a TV series... Nick |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |