Just had a look at the UFO page on Wikipaedia - I think it needs some
editing! |
Administrator
|
> Just had a look at the UFO page on Wikipaedia - I think it needs some
> editing! And what exactly would you change? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_%28TV_series%29 Marc |
I didn't think all the consoles etc were sold to the BBC but were
rented out. otherwise how did they turn up in all those ITV shows and films! I thought it was a couple of days in our atmosphere not a couple of hours. Almost human in appearance, um, what isn't human aboput their appearance apart from the green tint? What uniforms were recycled for Space:1999? I've never considered Straker to be a recovering alcoholic - is it mentioned anywhere? I thought Strakers car was aluminium not fibreglass? Correct me if I'm wrong - I'll own up to mistakes in my aging memory! --- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@...> wrote: > > > Just had a look at the UFO page on Wikipaedia - I think it needs some > > editing! > > And what exactly would you change? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_%28TV_series%29 > > Marc > |
Administrator
|
> I didn't think all the consoles etc were sold to the BBC but were
> rented out. otherwise how did they turn up in all those ITV shows > and films! Hmmm, I don't know which is correct, and also I don't think this is an important enough point to be in an encyclopedia entry. > I thought it was a couple of days in our atmosphere not a couple of > hours. Yes, I agree with that. > Almost human in appearance, um, what isn't human aboput their > appearance apart from the green tint? True. > What uniforms were recycled for Space:1999? None that I know of. > I've never considered Straker to be a recovering alcoholic - is it > mentioned anywhere? I think people have speculated this based on his refusal to drink (even though he got drunk on his wedding day). But since this is never specifically stated in the series, I agree that it doesn't belong. > I thought Strakers car was aluminium not fibreglass? That's my understanding... So are you going to update the entry? I see that this entry has been edited about a hundred times in the past 2 years (I haven't even read the whole thing, let alone edited it) Marc |
> So are you going to update the entry? I see that this entry has
> been edited about a hundred times in the past 2 years (I haven't > even read the whole thing, let alone edited it) > > Marc > I've created an account to edit it but can't seem to change the top first article. In this bit I wouldn't say that it was his first use of "live actors" but filming "live action". Actually no I'd change it to his first totally live-action TV show. Also would you say the Aliens are "attacking" Earth? On the whole not really - any thoughts on this? Barry |
Administrator
|
> Actually no I'd change it to his first totally live-action TV show.
Yes, that would be the most accurate, as Doppelganger was a live action move, and The Secret Service had live action elements in a TV show. > Also would you say the Aliens are "attacking" Earth? In my UFO FAQ, I say that the Aliens are "coming" to Earth and kidnapping humans. Marc |
Well I've made a few changes and messed up one line so it doesn't read
quite right now. I'll have to have a think about that one first though... --- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@...> wrote: > > > Actually no I'd change it to his first totally live-action TV show. > > Yes, that would be the most accurate, as Doppelganger was a > live action move, and The Secret Service had live action > elements in a TV show. > > > Also would you say the Aliens are "attacking" Earth? > > In my UFO FAQ, I say that the Aliens are "coming" to > Earth and kidnapping humans. > > Marc > |
As long as we're on the subject of the UFO Wikipedia entry, here's
something else I noticed: "As with all the later Anderson series, the special effects, supervised by Derek Meddings, were of the highest quality and outstanding for their day,..." This passage is wrong. If I recall correctly, Derek Meddings had no involvement with the special effects of Space:1999, which would be considered a "later Anderson series". Jeff --- In [hidden email], "naughtyhector" <rod.mitchell@...> wrote: > > Well I've made a few changes and messed up one line so it doesn't read > quite right now. I'll have to have a think about that one first > though... > > > --- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@> wrote: > > > > > Actually no I'd change it to his first totally live-action TV show. > > > > Yes, that would be the most accurate, as Doppelganger was a > > live action move, and The Secret Service had live action > > elements in a TV show. > > > > > Also would you say the Aliens are "attacking" Earth? > > > > In my UFO FAQ, I say that the Aliens are "coming" to > > Earth and kidnapping humans. > > > > Marc > > > |
Administrator
|
> "As with all the later Anderson series, the special effects,
> supervised by Derek Meddings, were of the highest quality and > outstanding for their day,..." > > This passage is wrong. If I recall correctly, Derek Meddings had no > involvement with the special effects of Space:1999, which would be > considered a "later Anderson series". And of course there are even later series still -- Terrahawks, Space Precinct, and the new Captain Scarlet! UFO is more of the "height" of Anderson's series, not later... :-) Marc |
In reply to this post by SHADO
Also, as long as I'm in nitpicking mode, this passage, too, is
incorrect: "The show's opening sequence begins by showing the (remarkable for the time) image of the removal of one of the contact lenses from an obviously real eye with a pair of forceps". It (the contact lens)wasn't removed with forceps (which are similar to a sort of tweezers, or pliers). It was removed with what appeared to be some type of suction cup gizmo. Jeff --- In [hidden email], "nafofu" <1shado1@...> wrote: > > As long as we're on the subject of the UFO Wikipedia entry, here's > something else I noticed: > > "As with all the later Anderson series, the special effects, > supervised by Derek Meddings, were of the highest quality and > outstanding for their day,..." > > This passage is wrong. If I recall correctly, Derek Meddings had no > involvement with the special effects of Space:1999, which would be > considered a "later Anderson series". > > Jeff > > --- In [hidden email], "naughtyhector" <rod.mitchell@> > wrote: > > > > Well I've made a few changes and messed up one line so it doesn't > read > > quite right now. I'll have to have a think about that one first > > though... > > > > > > --- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@> wrote: > > > > > > > Actually no I'd change it to his first totally live-action TV > show. > > > > > > Yes, that would be the most accurate, as Doppelganger was a > > > live action move, and The Secret Service had live action > > > elements in a TV show. > > > > > > > Also would you say the Aliens are "attacking" Earth? > > > > > > In my UFO FAQ, I say that the Aliens are "coming" to > > > Earth and kidnapping humans. > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
--- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote:
> > > "As with all the later Anderson series, the special effects, > > supervised by Derek Meddings, were of the highest quality and > > outstanding for their day,..." > > > > This passage is wrong. If I recall correctly, Derek Meddings had no > > involvement with the special effects of Space:1999, which would be > > considered a "later Anderson series". > > And of course there are even later series still -- Terrahawks, > Space Precinct, and the new Captain Scarlet! > > UFO is more of the "height" of Anderson's series, not later... :-) > > Marc > Excellent point, Marc! And more nitpickiness on my part: "Captured aliens are human in appearance except for the green hue of their skin caused by breathing a green oxygenated liquid, which is believed to cushion their bodies against the extreme acceleration of interstellar flight." Once again, correct me if I'm wrong, but the green tint wasn't caused by "breathing a green oxygenated liquid". The green tint of the liquid was ABSORBED by the skin. Also, wasn't it only the head that turned green, being in contact with the fluid? The hands were always flesh tone. Yes, I'm getting REALLY nitpicky, now. : ) Jeff |
I added the "green hue" bit as it wasn't mentioned. It still needs
work to iron out a few things but my brain wasn't firing on all cylinders last night...actually I wish I'd kept a copy of the page before starting to make changes. Barry |
In reply to this post by SHADO
I wasn't happy with the forceps bit but as I was recording Torchwood
I couldn't bung a DVD on to see what it was being used. Barry --- In [hidden email], "nafofu" <1shado1@...> wrote: > > Also, as long as I'm in nitpicking mode, this passage, too, is > incorrect: > > "The show's opening sequence begins by showing the (remarkable for > the time) image of the removal of one of the contact lenses from an > obviously real eye with a pair of forceps". > > It (the contact lens)wasn't removed with forceps (which are similar > to a sort of tweezers, or pliers). It was removed with what > appeared to be some type of suction cup gizmo. > > Jeff |
In reply to this post by SHADO
Good point!
I have a bit of trouble with articles that keep praising Meddings to the sky. Yes, he was an exceptional effects guy but the Lydeckers had done the same sort of excellent work before him. Barry --- In [hidden email], "nafofu" <1shado1@...> wrote: > > As long as we're on the subject of the UFO Wikipedia entry, here's > something else I noticed: > > "As with all the later Anderson series, the special effects, > supervised by Derek Meddings, were of the highest quality and > outstanding for their day,..." > > This passage is wrong. If I recall correctly, Derek Meddings had no > involvement with the special effects of Space:1999, which would be > considered a "later Anderson series". > > Jeff |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
How about something like...
Meddings work reached a pinnacle of excellence with this his last work for the Anderson's TV shows. He left and had an extensive movie career winning an Oscar as part of the effects team on Superman: The Movie. Barry --- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote: > > > "As with all the later Anderson series, the special effects, > > supervised by Derek Meddings, were of the highest quality and > > outstanding for their day,..." > > > > This passage is wrong. If I recall correctly, Derek Meddings had no > > involvement with the special effects of Space:1999, which would be > > considered a "later Anderson series". > > And of course there are even later series still -- Terrahawks, > Space Precinct, and the new Captain Scarlet! > > UFO is more of the "height" of Anderson's series, not later... :-) > > Marc > |
In reply to this post by SHADO
I've amended the first two lines to this...
Captured aliens are human in appearance except for the green hue of their face caused by breathing a green oxygenated liquid, which is believed to cushion their lungs against the extreme acceleration of interstellar flight. Anyone see a problem with this? Barry > Excellent point, Marc! And more nitpickiness on my part: > > "Captured aliens are human in appearance except for the green hue of > their skin caused by breathing a green oxygenated liquid, which is > believed to cushion their bodies against the extreme acceleration of > interstellar flight." > > Once again, correct me if I'm wrong, but the green tint wasn't caused > by "breathing a green oxygenated liquid". The green tint of the > liquid was ABSORBED by the skin. Also, wasn't it only the head that > turned green, being in contact with the fluid? The hands were always > flesh tone. Yes, I'm getting REALLY nitpicky, now. : ) > > Jeff > |
In reply to this post by naughtyhector-2
One of the nice things about wikis - they have built in change control. You
can always go back and look at pages at any point in time. On 10/26/06, naughtyhector <[hidden email]> wrote: > > actually I wish I'd kept a copy of the page > before starting to make changes. > -- Mario http://mario.silent-tower.org/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by naughtyhector-2
Yes. It still says that the green hue was caused by BREATHING the liquid. I could have sworn that in a couple episodes it was said that the skin ABSORBED the green tint. So even though the aliens WERE breathing a green oxygenated liquid, the skin turning green was not caused by the act of BREATHING it, but rather by being in contact with it. : )
Jeff P.S. Thanks for your efforts! naughtyhector <[hidden email]> wrote: I've amended the first two lines to this... Captured aliens are human in appearance except for the green hue of their face caused by breathing a green oxygenated liquid, which is believed to cushion their lungs against the extreme acceleration of interstellar flight. Anyone see a problem with this? Barry > Excellent point, Marc! And more nitpickiness on my part: > > "Captured aliens are human in appearance except for the green hue of > their skin caused by breathing a green oxygenated liquid, which is > believed to cushion their bodies against the extreme acceleration of > interstellar flight." > > Once again, correct me if I'm wrong, but the green tint wasn't caused > by "breathing a green oxygenated liquid". The green tint of the > liquid was ABSORBED by the skin. Also, wasn't it only the head that > turned green, being in contact with the fluid? The hands were always > flesh tone. Yes, I'm getting REALLY nitpicky, now. : ) > > Jeff > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by naughtyhector-2
Even though "forceps" doesn't appear to be accurate, it admittedly still SOUNDS better than my use of "suction cup gizmo", LOL!
Jeff naughtyhector <[hidden email]> wrote: I wasn't happy with the forceps bit but as I was recording Torchwood I couldn't bung a DVD on to see what it was being used. Barry --- In [hidden email], "nafofu" <1shado1@...> wrote: > > Also, as long as I'm in nitpicking mode, this passage, too, is > incorrect: > > "The show's opening sequence begins by showing the (remarkable for > the time) image of the removal of one of the contact lenses from an > obviously real eye with a pair of forceps". > > It (the contact lens)wasn't removed with forceps (which are similar > to a sort of tweezers, or pliers). It was removed with what > appeared to be some type of suction cup gizmo. > > Jeff [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by naughtyhector-2
To each his own. My problem isn't the praise of Meddings abilities, per se, but the statement about his work in "later Anderson series" (inferring Space:1999, etc.). The effects in Space:1999 SUCKED compared to Meddings work, and he shouldn't be credited with doing them by inference. Just my 2 cents...
Jeff naughtyhector <[hidden email]> wrote: Good point! I have a bit of trouble with articles that keep praising Meddings to the sky. Yes, he was an exceptional effects guy but the Lydeckers had done the same sort of excellent work before him. Barry --- In [hidden email], "nafofu" <1shado1@...> wrote: > > As long as we're on the subject of the UFO Wikipedia entry, here's > something else I noticed: > > "As with all the later Anderson series, the special effects, > supervised by Derek Meddings, were of the highest quality and > outstanding for their day,..." > > This passage is wrong. If I recall correctly, Derek Meddings had no > involvement with the special effects of Space:1999, which would be > considered a "later Anderson series". > > Jeff [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |