interceptor photos

where is there a photo of the new interceptor? I connected to one of the web links on one of the posts, but it appears to still be under construction

> where is there a photo of the new interceptor? I connected to one of the
> web links on one of the posts, but it appears to still be under
> construction

Here:

http://www.fanderson.org.uk/ufomovie/breakingnews.html

Looks like something from Battlestar Galactica, not the "near future"...

Marc

Is there another photo of the Interceptor, besides the dark shadowy nose-onview on that page?  Because I don't see folks issue with it, from what I can see of it.  It looks very close to being the Interceptor of the old series.
 
Jeff

--- On Mon, 1/18/10, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [SHADO] interceptor photos
To: [hidden email]
Date: Monday, January 18, 2010, 10:19 PM


 



> where is there a photo of the new interceptor? I connected to one of the
> web links on one of the posts, but it appears to still be under
> construction

Here:

http://www.fanderso n.org.uk/ ufomovie/ breakingnews. html

Looks like something from Battlestar Galactica, not the "near future"...

Marc







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> Is there another photo of the Interceptor, besides the dark shadowy
> nose-on view on that page?  Because I don't see folks issue with it, from
> what I can see of it.  It looks very close to being the Interceptor of
> the old series.

That's the only photo... I agree that it is pretty dark, so perhaps
I'm just interpreting it negatively?

Marc

Or maybe I'm interpreting it too positively.  Would sure like to get abetter look, although chances are good the final design might not be set in stone yet.  The agonizing wait for this movie will be the death of me!


--- On Tue, 1/19/10, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [SHADO] interceptor photos
To: [hidden email]
Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 12:37 PM


 



> Is there another photo of the Interceptor, besides the dark shadowy
> nose-on view on that page?  Because I don't see folks issue with it,from
> what I can see of it.  It looks very close to being the Interceptor of
> the old series.

That's the only photo... I agree that it is pretty dark, so perhaps
I'm just interpreting it negatively?

Marc







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I think Scotty put it best when he requested to see the Bridge of the Enterprise, NCC1701, no bloody A,B,C....

The classic designs are always the best, because we are used to it. I never liked ST-TNG's version, just didn't look right.

When I went to the Smithsonian Air-Space museum some years ago, there was only one thing I wanted to see. I asked everyone where it was, kept being told it was over there. I remember this... walking up a stair case getting up 1/2 way and seeing the famous saucer with the NCC-1701 on it :) I took probably a dozen photos from all different angles.

A couple of years ago, when they were auctioning off the items from Star Trek dating back to the original series to the latest movie, they had the items on display out in the open. I thought I died and went to heaven. Took loads of photos. I still shook my head in disgust when I saw the model theyblew up in the search for spock.


Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: Jeffrey Nelson
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [SHADO] interceptor photos


   
Or maybe I'm interpreting it too positively. Would sure like to get abetter look, although chances are good the final design might not be set in stone yet. The agonizing wait for this movie will be the death of me!

--- On Tue, 1/19/10, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:

From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [SHADO] interceptor photos
To: [hidden email]
Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 12:37 PM

  

> Is there another photo of the Interceptor, besides the dark shadowy
> nose-on view on that page? Because I don't see folks issue with it,from
> what I can see of it. It looks very close to being the Interceptor of
> the old series.

That's the only photo... I agree that it is pretty dark, so perhaps
I'm just interpreting it negatively?

Marc

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hi, All,

I don't see any sign that there has been a single remotely
substantive change in the design of the interceptor.

Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 7:01:38 PM, Bruce wrote:

B> I think Scotty put it best when he requested to see the
B> Bridge of the Enterprise, NCC1701, no bloody A,B,C....

B> The classic designs are always the best, because we are
B> used to it. I never liked ST-TNG's version, just didn't look right.

B> When I went to the Smithsonian Air-Space museum some
B> years ago, there was only one thing I wanted to see. I
B> asked everyone where it was, kept being told it was over
B> there. I remember this... walking up a stair case
B> getting up 1/2 way and seeing the famous saucer with the
B> NCC-1701 on it :) I took probably a dozen photos from all different angles.

B> A couple of years ago, when they were auctioning off the
B> items from Star Trek dating back to the original series
B> to the latest movie, they had the items on display out in
B> the open. I thought I died and went to heaven. Took
B> loads of photos. I still shook my head in disgust when I
B> saw the model they blew up in the search for spock.


B> Bruce
B> ----- Original Message -----
B> From: Jeffrey Nelson
B> To: [hidden email]
B> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 3:50 PM
B> Subject: Re: [SHADO] interceptor photos


B>
B> Or maybe I'm interpreting it too positively. Would
B> sure like to get a better look, although chances are good
B> the final design might not be set in stone yet. The
B> agonizing wait for this movie will be the death of me!

B> --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:

B> From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
B> Subject: Re: [SHADO] interceptor photos
B> To: [hidden email]
B> Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 12:37 PM

B> Â

>> Is there another photo of the Interceptor, besides the dark shadowy
>> nose-on view on that page? Because I don't see folks issue with it, from
>> what I can see of it. It looks very close to being the Interceptor of
>> the old series.

B> That's the only photo... I agree that it is pretty dark, so perhaps
B> I'm just interpreting it negatively?

B> Marc

B> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



B>


B> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




--

Jonathan Andrew Sheen

http://www.leviathanstudios.com
Leviathan of the GEI (Detached.)
[hidden email]

"What'dya expect? I'm a New Yorker!"
-Anonymous New York Firefighter, 9/12/01

That was my point when i made my little
joke
about seeing it somewhere before
it looks really good to me
sorry if it sounded negative
     thanks
            dave



________________________________
From: Jonathan Andrew Sheen <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Tue, January 19, 2010 7:35:57 PM
Subject: Re: [SHADO] interceptor photos

 
Hi, All,

I don't see any sign that there has been a single remotely
substantive change in the design of the interceptor.

Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 7:01:38 PM, Bruce wrote:

B> I think Scotty put it best when he requested to see the
B> Bridge of the Enterprise, NCC1701, no bloody A,B,C....

B> The classic designs are always the best, because we are
B> used to it. I never liked ST-TNG's version, just didn't look right.

B> When I went to the Smithsonian Air-Space museum some
B> years ago, there was only one thing I wanted to see. I
B> asked everyone where it was, kept being told it was over
B> there. I remember this... walking up a stair case
B> getting up 1/2 way and seeing the famous saucer with the
B> NCC-1701 on it :) I took probably a dozen photos from all different angles.

B> A couple of years ago, when they were auctioning off the
B> items from Star Trek dating back to the original series
B> to the latest movie, they had the items on display out in
B> the open. I thought I died and went to heaven. Took
B> loads of photos. I still shook my head in disgust when I
B> saw the model they blew up in the search for spock.

B> Bruce
B> ----- Original Message -----
B> From: Jeffrey Nelson
B> To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
B> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 3:50 PM
B> Subject: Re: [SHADO] interceptor photos

B>
B> Or maybe I'm interpreting it too positively. Would
B> sure like to get a better look, although chances are good
B> the final design might not be set in stone yet. The
B> agonizing wait for this movie will be the death of me!

B> --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Marc Martin <marc@ufoseries. com> wrote:

B> From: Marc Martin <marc@ufoseries. com>
B> Subject: Re: [SHADO] interceptor photos
B> To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
B> Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 12:37 PM

B> Â

>> Is there another photo of the Interceptor, besides the dark shadowy
>> nose-on view on that page? Because I don't see folks issue with it, from
>> what I can see of it. It looks very close to being the Interceptorof
>> the old series.

B> That's the only photo... I agree that it is pretty dark, so perhaps
B> I'm just interpreting it negatively?

B> Marc

B> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

B>

B> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

--

Jonathan Andrew Sheen

http://www.leviatha nstudios. com
Leviathan of the GEI (Detached.)
jsheen@leviathanstu dios.com

"What'dya expect? I'm a New Yorker!"
-Anonymous New York Firefighter, 9/12/01




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> I don't see any sign that there has been a single remotely
> substantive change in the design of the interceptor.

To my eyes, even the missile design is substantially
different, and does not appear to be a "near future"
design. But if you're just talking about the overall
shape of the vehicle, then you're right, it looks
pretty much the same as original Interceptors.

Marc

"If its not broke don't fix it." said by someone who obviously was not a rocket scientist.

James K.




________________________________
From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Wed, January 20, 2010 2:18:36 PM
Subject: Re: [SHADO] interceptor photos

 
> I don't see any sign that there has been a single remotely
> substantive change in the design of the interceptor.

To my eyes, even the missile design is substantially
different, and does not appear to be a "near future"
design. But if you're just talking about the overall
shape of the vehicle, then you're right, it looks
pretty much the same as original Interceptors.

Marc

 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Can you post all of your photos or send them to me I will host them on my website.




--- On Tue, 1/19/10, Bruce Sherman <[hidden email]> wrote:

From: Bruce Sherman <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [SHADO] interceptor photos
To: [hidden email]
Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 7:01 PM







 



 


   
     
     
I think Scotty put it best when he requested to see the Bridge of theEnterprise, NCC1701, no bloody A,B,C....



The classic designs are always the best, because we are used to it. I never liked ST-TNG's version, just didn't look right.



When I went to the Smithsonian Air-Space museum some years ago, there was only one thing I wanted to see. I asked everyone where it was, kept being told it was over there. I remember this... walking up a stair case getting up 1/2 way and seeing the famous saucer with the NCC-1701 on it :) I took probably a dozen photos from all different angles.



A couple of years ago, when they were auctioning off the items from Star Trek dating back to the original series to the latest movie, they had the items on display out in the open. I thought I died and went to heaven. Took loads of photos. I still shook my head in disgust when I saw the model theyblew up in the search for spock.



Bruce

----- Original Message -----

From: Jeffrey Nelson

To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com

Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 3:50 PM

Subject: Re: [SHADO] interceptor photos



Or maybe I'm interpreting it too positively. Would sure like to get a better look, although chances are good the final design might not be set in stone yet. The agonizing wait for this movie will be the death ofme!



--- On Tue, 1/19/10, Marc Martin <marc@ufoseries. com> wrote:



From: Marc Martin <marc@ufoseries. com>

Subject: Re: [SHADO] interceptor photos

To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com

Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 12:37 PM



  



> Is there another photo of the Interceptor, besides the dark shadowy

> nose-on view on that page? Because I don't see folks issue with it, from

> what I can see of it. It looks very close to being the Interceptor of

> the old series.



That's the only photo... I agree that it is pretty dark, so perhaps

I'm just interpreting it negatively?



Marc



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





   
     

   
   


 



 






     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]