Posted by Suzanne Sutherland on Jul 28, 2000; 10:59pm
URL: https://www.shado-forum.com/RE-CC-AOK-tp1489003p1489099.html

In message <[hidden email]>, [hidden email] writes

>So now my question is, after Mary remarried, would Straker still be paying
>alimony and child support? What are the Brit laws on that?

Not sure. I would think that if the child hasn't been legally adopted
by the new father that the biological one would still have to pay the
Child Support Agency.

I don't know anything about alimony laws. When I divorced my Mr Bishop
I didn't want to have anything to do with him anymore.;-)

>I'll bet my
>paperweight collection he still would be sending money to Mary to support
>Johnny, even after she married Mr. Stand There And Do Nothing Rutland. Not
>because he was obligated to, just because that seems like something he'd do.
>I doubt very much he'd leave the costs of raising, clothing, feeding and
>educating Johnny to Rutland. Just seems un-Straker to me.

--
Suzanne Sutherland