Login  Register

Re: feasibility.

Posted by Natasha Bell on Feb 19, 2004; 7:35am
URL: https://www.shado-forum.com/feasibility-tp1503275p1503284.html

--- In [hidden email], "Kevin Lazenby" <KevinLazenby8@a...>
wrote:
> II personally think the idea of bombarding the earth into
submission isn`t
> feasible, to put it politely. The military cold openly destroy
such
> asteroids with current technology (?).
>
> Besides, the aliens have such reduced resources, it would take more
> resources to implement such a plan than they have. Besides, what
about
> 'storage' of the 'raw' materials, on limited alien resources?

Kevin,

That is a good point, especially with regards to "current
technology". Even if current technology cannot sucessfully track
and hit and incoming asteriod, that depicted of SHADO certainly
can. Also in response to another post concerning a nuclear weapon
inpacting a large asteriod: who is to say that only one weapon is
used? Why not deploy ten. Also, a tiny divergence in the path of
the object could cause it to miss all together.

It would also seem logical to assume that the Aleins are lacking in
some areas and advanced in others - such as medical technology.
Otherwise, why don't they just clone what they need? If they are
truely out for conflict, what exactly do they want from Earth? As
it seems that everything on Earth is deadly to them - the water, the
atmosphere, SHADO operatives!

And finally...

TO THOSE TRAITORS WHO ARE ACTIVELY WORKING FOR THE ALIENS, I have
whispered your names in Commander Straker's ear!!! :-)

Hugs,
Tasha