Posted by
apecalypsenow on
URL: https://www.shado-forum.com/Hi-to-everyone-Let-s-fix-the-bloopers-tp1508454p1508459.html
Mmmmm don't they "change" when the cam makes a LONG SHOT, by the
way? Can you describe me the sequence better?
GOSH!
Any other blooper to fix by the way?
--- In
[hidden email], Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@...> wrote:
>
> Well, I couldn't think of a plausible 'fix'. I thought I'd leave
that up to you. : ) And while some of your other suggestions sound
feasible, this one is a little farfetched. If, in the scenes in
question, the helmets had started one color, then changed to the
other color, it would be believable. But the colors alternate back
and forth from gray to yellow. And the lighting in each scene
doesn't appear to change. Maybe they operate more like the 'mood
rings' of the seventies, and being women, their moods are constantly
changing, LOL. How's that for farfetched? : )
>
> Jeff
>
> apecalypsenow <apecalypsenow@...> wrote:
>
> What's your "fix"? I think the accessories are made of a new
> experimental material which undergoes chromatic change according
to
> the different lights it is exposed to... :)
>
> --- In
[hidden email], Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@> wrote:
> >
> > Welcome to the group!
> > In THE RESPONSIBILITY SEAT, starting at 44:10, the girls are
> space-suited up, in the control sphere of Moonbase, in preparation
> for the impending crash of the Russian vehicle. In some of the
> shots, their space suit helmets (and various accessories) are
> painted a very light grey color. Yet in other shots, they are
> painted yellow.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > apecalypsenow <apecalypsenow@> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm Colonel Apecalypse... a new member of SHADO. Quite frankly,
> I'm
> > Italian, and I've become a fan of this series (even if I'm still
a
> > neophyte by a technical standpoint). My very first approach was
in
> > 2003, when a local TV channel aired some episodes... and I was
> > HOOKED forever by the '60ies design!
> >
> > Lately, I purchased the Italian movies in DIVX format... I'll
scan
> > the covers as soon as I can. You will like them, sure as hell!
> >
> > Since I hate BLOOPERS, and can't really conceive that this
> fantastic
> > series gets a few ones... let's fix them through reasoning!
Let's
> > show to the world that U.F.O. is a perfect product!
> >
> > These are my "chops" (attempts) by the way:
> >
> > There are a few. Probably the most noticeable is in THE LONG
> SLEEP,
> > when Straker refers to a "Miss Ross". The original script gave
> > Catherine a last name of "Ross", but this was changed
to "Fraser"
> > prior to filming -- unfortunately, one occurance of "Ross"
managed
> > to slip by everyone involved in the production!
> >
> > SURNAME... WAS SHE MARRIED OR DIVORCED? THAT COULD BE HER EX-
> > HUSBAND'S SURNAME...
> >
> > In IDENTIFIED, Lt. Ford tells Straker that he's been with SHADO
> for
> > two years. Yet, during a flashback in CONFETTI CHECK A-OK, we
see
> > that he was with SHADO ten years ago!
> >
> > HE QUITTED SHADO AFTER SOME TIME, THEN RE-JOINED IT TWO YEARS
> > BEFORE...
> >
> > In REFLECTIONS IN THE WATER, there is a major battle at the end,
> and
> > 4 Interceptor missiles are shown to be fired, which is somewhat
> > surprising, since there are only 3 Interceptors with 1 missile
> each!
> >
> > NEW EXPERIMENTAL INTERCEPTOR BEARING A TWO MISSILES SET.
> >
> > In CONFETTI CHECK A-OK, there is a shot of Straker's futuristic
> car
> > pulling up to General Henderson's office. The problem is that
this
> > is a flashback scene, and was long before Straker had a
futuristic
> > car!
> >
> > ????? HE GOT THE PROTOTYPE AROUND THAT TIME! IS IT POSSIBLE?
> >
> > In THE SQUARE TRIANGLE, an Interceptor attack on an incoming UFO
> is
> > called off, yet when they show the Interceptors about to return
to
> > Moonbase, their missiles have already been fired!
> >
> > WHO KNOWS? THEY FIRED THEM. JUST TESTING THE PYROTECNICS.
> >
> > In COMPUTER AFFAIR, Astronaut Mark Bradley and Gay Ellis have
> dinner
> > together and are drinking a 1984 vintage wine. While not
> technically
> > a blooper, many fans regard this as a mistake, as this episode
> seems
> > to be early in SHADO's history, which would put it in the 1980-
> 1981
> > time frame.
> >
> > IS THIS 'HISTORY' A *CANON* BY THE WAY? MAYBE THE SERIES IS
> > DEPICTING A LONGER SPAN OF EVENTS... 1980-1984. MY GUESS
> >
> > ARE OTHER BLOOPERS OUT OF THERE? HOPE NOT! PLEASE, TELL ME
> > MY "FIXES" ARE CORRECT, AND CONFIRM THAT THERE ARE NO MORE
> BLOOPERS.
> >
> > MANY THANKS TO EVERYONE... HOPE TO BE WELCOMED AND ANSWERED.
> >
> > T.C.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>