RE: Google's UFO

Posted by SHADO on
URL: https://www.shado-forum.com/Andersonic-New-Issue-8-tp1512708p1512716.html

Thanks, Mary!!  : )
 
Jeff

--- On Sat, 9/5/09, MARY VERES <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: MARY VERES <[hidden email]>
Subject: RE: [SHADO] Google's UFO
To: [hidden email]
Date: Saturday, September 5, 2009, 4:43 PM


 




Not stupid... let me introduce you! Go to www.Google.com. Google (web search engine) gets a kick out of coming up with unique logos when there is a event, date, holiday, etc. worth playing with their logo. They usually have ahot button that explains the logo...as you'll see, today's logo has a UFO on it and NO explanation. ..which makes one click on the hyperlink to see where it takes you, and it goes to unexplained phenomenon.. .from which you get to see the top 10 unexplained phenomenon. UFOs are # 7 on the list. If you really want to learn about Google.com logos here is their official sitethat shows the archive of logos...some of them have been pretty creative! http://www.google- logos.com/

Sorry for the slightly OT

Cheers,

Mary


To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
From: 1shado1@sbcglobal. net
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:33:00 -0700
Subject: Re: [SHADO] Google's UFO

Didn't even know there was a Google image of the day. I feel stupid. I still don't even know where to find it. *sigh*

Jeff

--- On Sat, 9/5/09, MARY VERES <veres_mary@msn. com> wrote:

From: MARY VERES <veres_mary@msn. com>
Subject: [SHADO] Google's UFO
To: shado@yahoogroups. com
Date: Saturday, September 5, 2009, 4:15 PM

Any comments about the Google image for today? I thought sure someone on this list would have something to say...too bad they didn't do a better job on the UFO picture so it looked more like our UFOs... Although the Google meaning isn't really clear...I know where my head when went I saw it!!!

Cheers,

Mary

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]