Posted by pyschobomb on
URL: https://www.shado-forum.com/Signed-Copy-of-Shane-Rimmer-Book-tp1906819p1930933.html

I agree, but comedy is the only writing medium I know and it would NEVER be a comedy version of the series just heavily influenced as it has had an impact on my life both in  fiction and fact :-)

--- On Fri, 11/19/10, Billy Killian <[hidden email]> wrote:

From: Billy Killian <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [SHADO] UFO  2012 !
To: [hidden email]
Date: Friday, November 19, 2010, 4:18 AM







 



 


   
     
     
      Well Stevan given what has happen with remakes of other classic TV series of

late this cut budget could very well mean just that, they plan to go the comedy

route heaven help us.

    But good luck with yours,

    James Killian



 



________________________________

From: Stevan Warburton <[hidden email]>

To: [hidden email]

Cc: [hidden email]

Sent: Thu, November 18, 2010 11:43:13 AM

Subject: Re: [SHADO] UFO 2012 !



 



I could make my comedy  sci-fi trilogy (very loosely based upon UFO) for a tenth

of that!

--- On Thu, 11/18/10, Billy Killian <[hidden email]> wrote:



From: Billy Killian <[hidden email]>

Subject: Re: [SHADO] UFO 2012 !

To: [hidden email]

Date: Thursday, November 18, 2010, 2:12 AM



 



Marc,



and anyone else who might be interested I also had a look at the IMDB site for



the up coming UFO film and beside the date change I also noticed the supposed



budget for the film.  Only 95 million dollars.  That sort of on the low side in



this day for a Sci-Fi film.  The cast will take a good deal of that leaving very



little for anything in the way of FX work or extras.  Anybody think they can do



a good film on this kind of money?



    James K.



________________________________



From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>



To: [hidden email]



Sent: Wed, November 17, 2010 2:09:46 PM



Subject: Re: [SHADO] UFO 2012 !



 



> I'm sorry if this has been mentioned before, but I notice that IMDB are



> listing the movie as 2012 release and I am sure this had been listed as



> 2011 previously



I don't know if that's been mentioned here, but someone pointed out that



change to me months ago.



Marc



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





   
     

   
   


 



 






     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]