Posted by
pyschobomb on
URL: https://www.shado-forum.com/Signed-Copy-of-Shane-Rimmer-Book-tp1906819p1931720.html
I for one really morn the loss of traditional model makers on film and TV; you know the object you are looking at on a 2 dimensional screen is 3 dimensional and is tangible; unlike millions of CG Pixels..
--- On Fri, 11/19/10, Hemmings, Rob K. <
[hidden email]> wrote:
From: Hemmings, Rob K. <
[hidden email]>
Subject: RE: [SHADO] UFO 2012 !
To: "'
[hidden email]'" <
[hidden email]>
Date: Friday, November 19, 2010, 4:03 PM
Agreed.
Ridley Scott didn't do bad with only 14/28 million for Blade Runner. :o)
(well, as long as you view the seminal Directors Cut version, rather
than the dumbbed-down original release.)
Little models, painted scenery, but you can't tell that in the film -
those Blade Runner scenes look more realistic than any made using CGI
and costing megabucks, as in more recent films (which others have
already mentioned.)
One (rhet.) question though: Are there still the skills out there to
do stuff like this based on models?..
Best,
--
Rob
>-----Original Message-----
>From:
[hidden email] [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
>Marc Martin
>Sent: 18 November 2010 03:08
>To:
[hidden email]
>Subject: Re: [SHADO] UFO 2012 !
>
>> Marc, and anyone else who might be interested I also had a look at the
>> IMDB site for the up coming UFO film and beside the date change I also
>> noticed the supposed budget for the film. Only 95 million dollars.
>> That sort of on the low side in this day for a Sci-Fi film. The cast
>> will take a good deal of that leaving very little for anything in the
>> way of FX work or extras. Anybody think they can do a good film on
>> this kind of money?
>
>I think earlier articles had the budget at $130 million. Who knows
>what's correct, or even if this film will ever be made?
>
>Frankly, I see a limited budget as a potential good thing. The original
>series did NOT have an infinite amount of money at their disposal, and
>some of the episodes were pretty low budget.
>
>Marc
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]