Re: Anouska Hempel was in UFO and Space 1999

Posted by Deborah Rorabaugh-2 on
URL: https://www.shado-forum.com/Anouska-Hempel-was-in-UFO-and-Space-1999-tp3128136p3130605.html

Since I had to go through all the DVDs for the frame caps, there are some
really subtle things in some episodes. Jackson gets such a bum rap
sometimes, but if you watch him in Reflections, you can see his disapproval
of Straker's actions towards Anderson. Foster just seems to go along with
dosing Anderson up, but you KNOW Jackson's not good with it but he's going
along with in anyway. *grin*

And maybe that's one of the reason's UFO has had such lasting power - some
of the performances were so superbly nuanced. The little double takes from
the operatives when things were getting weirder than usual, Jackson's 'mad
doctor' mode. Foster's 'get back to your seat' look. The little things that
make it feel like you know these people.

And Lake's glares in Straker's direction. *grin* How can you not love a
woman who obviously cannot believe Straker just said something so asinine?
*grin*

 

  _____  

From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:57 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [SHADO] Re: Anouska Hempel was in UFO and Space 1999

 

 

I knew there was another name out there for her, I don't think either of
them were used onscreen. In my stories I use Paulson.

I had to laugh when Foster gave her with a "get back to your seat" look in
Mindbender. *grin*

--- In [hidden email] <mailto:SHADO%40yahoogroups.com> , "Deborah
Rorabaugh" <momkat@...> wrote:
>
> Strangely enough, the UFO credits all had her as the 'unnamed'
> radio/sky-diver/ fill-in-the-blank operative. Chris Bentley has the
> character as being named Catherine Scott and IMDB has the same character
as
> Tamara Paulson.
>
> And I simply cannot remember where that name came from.
>
> She's one of those characters that I've always wanted to threaten with
> scissors, or hair clips. The purple hair on Moonbase was bad enough but
the
> sheepdog look is just wrong on so many levels. ;-)





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]