Posted by pyschobomb on
URL: https://www.shado-forum.com/Not-UFO-but-still-Gerry-Anderson-Space-2099-tp3732927p3736218.html



I always thought that they should have set it in 2099 as none of the technology they use is anywhere near it in today's science. You are right about the audiences of today; science has to be exact as there is always some smartypants who finds a fault in the science yet knowone complains about Start Trek..


________________________________
 From: lazenbyland <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 2:19 PM
Subject: Res: Re: Res: [SHADO] Not UFO but still Gerry Anderson Space 2099
 

 
This would be great as long as the science is better. Audiences have evolved over the last decades where they are much more savvy about what is and isn't possible.

Space 1999, though I loved the first series, has REALLY bad science that wouldn't wash with audiences today.

Perhaps with CERN at the forefront of science, they could have Moonbase Alpha recording results from a Super-super collider with accelerators strategically placed in the orbit of the moon..

They switch it on  and.......


 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]