Guess who bumped into Ed Bishop on his way to work this morning ? I'd assumed he was across the pond. Having recently picked up the DVD's + found the site I don't think I would have recognised him had I not seen the photos from the conventions. To think I was talking to the man who stood between Planet Earth + alien colonisation / mutilation. The next thing I remember was some strange flashing lights and all I could think of was "KILL STRAKER !!" However, my idol does have feet of clay .. he reads the Daily Mail (never saw that on Moonbase !). To widen out the discussion of individual episodes, I watched all 26 episodes over about a week + 2 things struck me - first that the first series was as impressive as I remembered it. Strong characters, tension filled stories and a real sense of "otherness" about the aliens. The insights gleaned about the aliens had a cohesiveness about them but fuelled the sense of myth and "unknowableness" about them. Series 2 however was a disappointment. (I mean Freeman has a sex change + no-one notices ?)But seriously, too many of the plots seemed haphazard + brought no real depth to the overall story. The issue seemed more about putting together some sort of story to fill an episode - invariably involving people being taken over so that they can kill Straker / stop SHADO etc (again). But they shed no furher insight on the aliens/ their mindset / culture / intentions / technologies etc. Also no development of Shado / Moonbase / the struggle / the main characters emerge. I was left with a distinct sense of "what was the point of that ?" + feeling that a formula was being applied. As already stated, I was very disappointed - a great opportunity was lost and instead the characters stopped developping and there was a sense of caricature about it all. Does anyone share my mixed feelings ? I still think it's great but it could have been greater. Chou Tee-pee |
Banned User
|
This post was updated on .
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
In reply to this post by teee_peee <teee_peee@yahoo.co.uk>
>"teee_peee" <[hidden email]>
wrote: >Series 2 however was a disappointment. (I mean Freeman has a sex >change + no-one notices ?)But seriously, too many of the plots seemed >haphazard + brought no real depth to the overall story. The issue >seemed more about putting together some sort of story to fill an >episode - invariably involving people being taken over so that they >can kill Straker / stop SHADO etc (again). But they shed no furher >insight on the aliens/ their mindset / culture / intentions / >technologies etc. Also no development of Shado / Moonbase / the >struggle / the main characters emerge. I was left with a distinct >sense of "what was the point of that ?" + feeling that a formula was >being applied. >As already stated, I was very disappointed - a great opportunity was >lost and instead the characters stopped developping and there was a >sense of caricature about it all. >Does anyone share my mixed feelings ? I still think it's great but it >could have been greater. Yes, many of the fans share your view. But beware of those who prefer season two's weirdest episodes! *grin* But the disappointment brought on by some of those later episodes produced many UFO fan fic writers to improve the situation, which isn't such a bad thing, you know. If the series had been perfect, there would have been no need for us! Yours, Denise _________________________________________________________________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
Straker, somehow it's always about you.
|
In reply to this post by teee_peee <teee_peee@yahoo.co.uk>
In a message dated 27/11/02 06:48:04 GMT Standard Time, [hidden email]
writes: > Guess who bumped into Ed Bishop on his way to work this morning ? I'd > assumed he was across the pond. > Having recently picked up the DVD's + found the site I don't think I > would have recognised him had I not seen the photos from the > conventions. To think I was talking to the man who stood between > Planet Earth + alien colonisation / mutilation. > Can you elaborate, details?, when where etc etc <please> > The next thing I remember was some strange flashing lights and all I > could think of was "KILL STRAKER !!" > Sorry Claire and Amelia (Ed bodyguards) would have had to have taken you to an underground bunker and smacked you around a little <grin> just to remove any trace of that deep sublimibal impulse - you know, nothing personal. > However, my idol does have feet of clay .. he reads the Daily Mail > (never saw that on Moonbase !). > The good old Daily Mail, one of our erm.well I was going to say intelligent tabloids.but then it is a newspaper so,...well its a tabloid <grin> Claire [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by teee_peee <teee_peee@yahoo.co.uk>
[hidden email] wrote:
> Is the Mail a tabloid or just more like a magazine than it is a > newspaper? > It's a rather conservative (and indeed, Conservative) tabloid. |
In reply to this post by teee_peee <teee_peee@yahoo.co.uk>
"teee_peee" wrote:
> > Guess who bumped into Ed Bishop on his way to work this morning ? I'd > assumed he was across the pond. > Having recently picked up the DVD's + found the site I don't think I > would have recognised him had I not seen the photos from the > conventions. To think I was talking to the man who stood between > Planet Earth + alien colonisation / mutilation. > Was he wearing a hat? James |
In reply to this post by teee_peee <teee_peee@yahoo.co.uk>
I agree with teee_peee about the second series. I wonder what would have
been in the third series had the funding, time and desire to develop been there? Mary Series 2 however was a disappointment. (I mean Freeman has a sex change + no-one notices ?)But seriously, too many of the plots seemed haphazard + brought no real depth to the overall story. The issue seemed more about putting together some sort of story to fill an episode - invariably involving people being taken over so that they can kill Straker / stop SHADO etc (again). But they shed no furher insight on the aliens/ their mindset / culture / intentions / technologies etc. Also no development of Shado / Moonbase / the struggle / the main characters emerge. I was left with a distinct sense of "what was the point of that ?" + feeling that a formula was being applied. |
In reply to this post by bedsitter1
> > However, my idol does have feet of clay .. he reads the Daily Mail
> > (never saw that on Moonbase !). Well, nobody is perfect. > Mr. Bishop reads the Times, too. Is the Mail a tabloid or just more like a > magazine than it is a newspaper? Yes, it's a tabloid. A right-wing, reactionary effort. Dave. |
In reply to this post by teee_peee <teee_peee@yahoo.co.uk>
[hidden email] wrote:
> > > Yes, it's a tabloid. A right-wing, reactionary effort. > > Dave. yawn ... |
In reply to this post by jamesgibbon
--- In SHADO@y..., James Gibbon <james.gibbon@v...> wrote:
> "teee_peee" wrote: > > > > Guess who bumped into Ed Bishop on his way to work this morning ? I'd > > assumed he was across the pond. > > Having recently picked up the DVD's + found the site I don't think I > > would have recognised him had I not seen the photos from the > > conventions. To think I was talking to the man who stood between > > Planet Earth + alien colonisation / mutilation. > > > > > Was he wearing a hat? > > James If you want to know, he was wearing a very dapper pin-stripey suit (but no hat - sorry)) + so looked like he was off to the City, which threw me a bit as I felt I was going to make a complete **** of myself asking him if he was Ed Bishop. I'm intrigued that the Daily Mail has produced more response than my thoughts on the 2nd series, or maybe what I said has been rehearsed in a previous life. Hey, how about a discussion on whether SHADO was a Right Wing covert organisation hell bent on ... (only kidding). I am indebted to the info with the DVD's - one particular gem being about Col Foster's Syrup (wig). I couldn't quite work out what was going on but all has become clear now. teee-peee |
In reply to this post by starfire05
--- In SHADO@y..., starfire05@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 27/11/02 06:48:04 GMT Standard Time, teee_peee@y... > writes: > > > > Guess who bumped into Ed Bishop on his way to work this morning ? I'd > > assumed he was across the pond. > > Having recently picked up the DVD's + found the site I don't think I > > would have recognised him had I not seen the photos from the > > conventions. To think I was talking to the man who stood between > > Planet Earth + alien colonisation / mutilation. > > > Can you elaborate, details?, when where etc etc <please> > > > > The next thing I remember was some strange flashing lights and all I > > could think of was "KILL STRAKER !!" > > > Sorry Claire and Amelia (Ed bodyguards) would have had to have taken you to > an underground bunker and smacked you around a little <grin> just to remove > any trace of that deep sublimibal impulse - you know, nothing personal. > > > > However, my idol does have feet of clay .. he reads the Daily > > (never saw that on Moonbase !). > > > The good old Daily Mail, one of our erm.well I was going to say intelligent > tabloids.but then it is a newspaper so,...well its a tabloid <grin> > > > > Claire > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Claire If I told you where I met him I would have to kill you ... It was on a train from Surrey to Waterloo just before 10 am (I was late for work !) I told him I only recognised him from the photos at the conventions and he joked about how he earned a living out of them. I didn't tell him that I'm a Tax man - I'll get you yet Straker !! I'm still getting some flashing lights etc etc, so if you + Amelia could provide some remedial therapy ...<grin> teee-peee |
In reply to this post by teee_peee <teee_peee@yahoo.co.uk>
Gee picking on Straker and Claire(both of whom have some very dangerous
friends) Hope your affairs are in order. James K.(trying to get the thought of Miss Piggy at the Moonbase control station out of his head) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by teee_peee <teee_peee@yahoo.co.uk>
"teee_peee" wrote:
> If you want to know, he was wearing a very dapper pin-stripey suit > (but no hat - sorry)) + so looked like he was off to the City, which > threw me a bit as I felt I was going to make a complete **** of > myself asking him if he was Ed Bishop. > > That's interesting - I had a similar close encounter myself in a small supermarket in London last December, and he was wearing a pinstripe suit then too, but he also had a quite distinctive wide-brimmed hat on. James |
In reply to this post by teee_peee <teee_peee@yahoo.co.uk>
In a message dated 28/11/02 07:09:04 GMT Standard Time, [hidden email]
writes: > > I'm still getting some flashing lights etc etc, so if you + Amelia > > could provide some remedial therapy ...<grin> > > > Sure, just come on down to the Shado firing range first...I'll make those > bad > flashing lights go away... > And I'll back you up <Claire stands a little to the side of Amelia wielding a big stick> > > Amelia (just knowing her cohorts in crime in England, including the > intrepid > Claire, are going to hang around the train station now, looking for a man > in > a striped suit, reading the Daily Mail, with a distinctive voice) > > Yes, the Bishop Protection Service has been reactivated, the train station is staked out covertly round the clock, our brief - the man in the pinstripe suit with a big hat, gorgeous, yes that's right, gorgeous blue eyes and that voice reading the Daily Mail, may have a woman with him with salt and pepper hair. We've also staked out the airport and the docks (just in case), but with my look when Ed's ship comes in - I'll be at the Airport <sigh> Claire [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by teee_peee <teee_peee@yahoo.co.uk>
> I am indebted to the info with the DVD's - one particular gem being
> about Col Foster's Syrup (wig). I couldn't quite work out what was > going on but all has become clear now. Which one, the one on his head or the one adorning his chest? ;) (sorry - couldn't resist) Dave. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |