Coming soon... new UFO photos?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Coming soon... new UFO photos?

Marc Martin
Administrator
Hi all,

One of the things that I've been putting off for a long time is
adding some new UFO publicity photos to my UFO website. I'm
hoping that I may actually get some free time in the coming
weeks to start working on that (fingers-crossed).

One question I always put to myself is "what resolution should
I use?". Too little resolution (e.g, 640 x 480) and you can't
see all the details. Too much resolution (e.g. 3000 x 2000)
and it won't fit on anyone's computer screen and it'll be
a slow file to download. I suppose it will all depend on the
quality of the source material (most of my source material
isn't that great), but if anyone has any comments to make
on this before I get started, please do! (the last time
I did this I was using 768 x 1024 pixels as a good
compromise)

Thanks!

Marc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Coming soon... new UFO photos?

Branko
The bigger the better! Connections are much better these days.
Thanks in advance!


>From: "Marc Martin" <[hidden email]>
>Reply-To: [hidden email]
>To: [hidden email]
>Subject: [SHADO] Coming soon... new UFO photos?
>Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:31:19 -0800
>
>Hi all,
>
>One of the things that I've been putting off for a long time is
>adding some new UFO publicity photos to my UFO website. I'm
>hoping that I may actually get some free time in the coming
>weeks to start working on that (fingers-crossed).
>
>One question I always put to myself is "what resolution should
>I use?". Too little resolution (e.g, 640 x 480) and you can't
>see all the details. Too much resolution (e.g. 3000 x 2000)
>and it won't fit on anyone's computer screen and it'll be
>a slow file to download. I suppose it will all depend on the
>quality of the source material (most of my source material
>isn't that great), but if anyone has any comments to make
>on this before I get started, please do! (the last time
>I did this I was using 768 x 1024 pixels as a good
>compromise)
>
>Thanks!
>
>Marc

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Coming soon... new UFO photos?

Ron DeMedeiros
In reply to this post by Marc Martin

> One question I always put to myself is "what
> resolution should
> I use?". Too little resolution (e.g, 640 x 480) and
> you can't
> see all the details. Too much resolution (e.g. 3000
> x 2000)
> and it won't fit on anyone's computer screen and
> it'll be
> a slow file to download. I suppose it will all
> depend on the
> quality of the source material (most of my source
> material
> isn't that great), but if anyone has any comments to
> make
> on this before I get started, please do! (the last
> time
> I did this I was using 768 x 1024 pixels as a good
> compromise)
>

768 x 1024 would probably be the best compromise or
possibly 1280 x 960.




____________________________________________________________________________________
Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Coming soon... new UFO photos?

Paul Bowers
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
You could use a slideshow generation program like this one:

http://www.coffeecup.com/photo-gallery/help/tutorials/

and have the images expand to full resolution if clicked.

If this works the way I think it does, you'd just upload full-resolution
images and let the software do the re-sizing of the thumbnails and the
selected previewed image for the user.

I assume you'll be scanning photos yourself and that's why you are
asking about how much resolution.

Paul


Marc Martin wrote:

> One question I always put to myself is "what resolution should
> I use?". Too little resolution (e.g, 640 x 480) and you can't
> see all the details. Too much resolution (e.g. 3000 x 2000)
> and it won't fit on anyone's computer screen and it'll be
> a slow file to download. I suppose it will all depend on the
> quality of the source material (most of my source material
> isn't that great), but if anyone has any comments to make
> on this before I get started, please do! (the last time
> I did this I was using 768 x 1024 pixels as a good
> compromise)
>
> Thanks!
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Coming soon... new UFO photos?

Griff
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Hi

1024 x 768 works for me :) the higher the better, but don't wish to be
greedy. Thanks for sharing what you have Marc...

Best to all,

Griff

In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@...> wrote:
>
> One question I always put to myself is "what resolution should
> I use?". Too little resolution (e.g, 640 x 480) and you can't
> see all the details. Too much resolution (e.g. 3000 x 2000)
> and it won't fit on anyone's computer screen and it'll be
> a slow file to download.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Coming soon... new UFO photos?

davrecon-3
In reply to this post by Marc Martin

You might have an available selection of different sizes (small 300x200 sizes for quick previews, and then the larger more detailed available for those who want the full detail). I always use a photo program to view larger picture files, that way I can zoom in or out as I please. Just download the photo first before viewing it. Anyone with such a program can view any sized files w/out that annoying "tunnel vision" problem.


------------------------------------------------------------


----- Original Message -----
From: Marc Martin
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 5:31 PM
Subject: [SHADO] Coming soon... new UFO photos?


Hi all,

One of the things that I've been putting off for a long time is
adding some new UFO publicity photos to my UFO website. I'm
hoping that I may actually get some free time in the coming
weeks to start working on that (fingers-crossed).

One question I always put to myself is "what resolution should
I use?". Too little resolution (e.g, 640 x 480) and you can't
see all the details. Too much resolution (e.g. 3000 x 2000)
and it won't fit on anyone's computer screen and it'll be
a slow file to download. I suppose it will all depend on the
quality of the source material (most of my source material
isn't that great), but if anyone has any comments to make
on this before I get started, please do! (the last time
I did this I was using 768 x 1024 pixels as a good
compromise)

Thanks!

Marc




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Coming soon... new UFO photos?

Marc Martin
Administrator
davrecon wrote:
> You might have an available selection of different sizes (small 300x200 sizes
> for quick previews, and then the larger more detailed available

Yes, I have done that in the past (for example, http://ufoseries.com/hardware),
but that is more work on my part, and more files to put online/link to. I'd
like to make things as easy for myself as possible...

Marc