It finally popped through my
letterbox this morning. The packaging was a bit on the thin side, but it survived the rigour of the Royal Mail. Looking at the case it has a track listing of 27 titles on both CDs:1.UFO-main theme. 2-6.IDENTIFIED. 7.Commercial break sting 1. 8.Unidentified[alternative score]. 9-13. SURVIVAL. 14-18. EXPOSED. 19. Commercial break sting 2. 21-25. CONFLICT. 26.E.S.P. 27.UFO-End titles. CD2:1.UFO-Main theme. 2-6. A QUESTION OF PRORITIES.7-11. ORDEAL. 12-16. THE SQUARE TRIANGLE. 17-21. CONFETTI CHECK A.O.K. 22.Straker's theme[alternative cue].23-24. THE LONG SLEEP. No listing of 25-26 on case! 27. UFO-End titles. CD 1 running time:78:35. CD 2 running time:76:33. Excuse me now while I spend the rest of the day in aural heaven! |
It is cool to see/hear that at least they have included some of Barry
Gray original mono mixes. The disc art work is cool, and in my opinion would have perhaps made better cover art. The Lunadude --- In [hidden email], "the_connoisseuruk" <peter.tessmer@n...> wrote: > It finally popped through my > letterbox this morning. The > packaging was a bit on the thin > side, but it survived the rigour of > the Royal Mail. Looking at the case > it has a track listing of 27 titles > on both CDs:1.UFO-main theme. > 2-6.IDENTIFIED. 7.Commercial break > sting 1. 8.Unidentified[alternative > score]. 9-13. SURVIVAL. 14-18. > EXPOSED. 19. Commercial break sting > 2. 21-25. CONFLICT. 26.E.S.P. > 27.UFO-End titles. CD2:1.UFO-Main > theme. 2-6. A QUESTION OF > PRORITIES.7-11. ORDEAL. 12-16. THE > SQUARE TRIANGLE. 17-21. CONFETTI > CHECK A.O.K. 22.Straker's > theme[alternative cue].23-24. THE > LONG SLEEP. No listing of 25-26 on > case! 27. UFO-End titles. CD 1 > running time:78:35. CD 2 running > time:76:33. Excuse me now while I > spend the rest of the day in aural > heaven! |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by the_connoisseuruk
> It is cool to see/hear that at least they have included some of
> Barry Gray original mono mixes. I think they probably included some mono mixes because they had no other choice -- there were no stereo mixes available for some of the tracks. So are the stereo mixes faithful to the originals? Marc |
> I think they probably included some mono mixes because they had no other > choice Partly, but the liner notes also make mention that some were included in deference to the original sound particulary the opening an closing signitures. > So are the stereo mixes faithful to the originals? In my opinion the remixes are generally OK [it's nice to see that the liner notes do admit to the stereo versions being as being remixes] with no overt remixing that makes you think it particulary different for difference sake. Although there are occasions it sounds a little gimmicky and the bass is a bit washed out in places. But, that has perhaps more to to do with the nature of late sixties stereo [ie the nature of the beast] and being less familiar with stereo versions rather anything else. The sonic reproduction is of a high standard throughout with some nice top end definition. This would have been by and large missing from the original Tv transnissions [and probably the DVD's if they used the original sound mags] as the sound would have been compressed to suit the frequency range of early 70's television. Generally it is a very nice product,the booklet is crammed with nice colour photo's. Although my booklet was a little jammed into to jewel case, leading to it being a little creased. We are certainly far better off with this set, than without out and I recommend it. The Lunadude > > Marc |
In reply to this post by the_connoisseuruk
--- In [hidden email], "the_connoisseuruk" <peter.tessmer@n...>
wrote: > It finally popped through my > letterbox this morning. The > packaging was a bit on the thin > side, but it survived the rigour of > the Royal Mail. Looking at the case > it has a track listing of 27 titles > on both CDs:1.UFO-main theme. With or without the sound effects? |
In reply to this post by the_connoisseuruk
Hello
My copy also arrived yesterday. All in all very pleased with it - of course we're all familiar with the music, but the quality of the remastering is superb. Some of the tracks (I've only had chance to listen to part of CD1 on my way to work today, I've been in Hammond Heaven) are in mono - sadly they comprise the score to the first episode, and therefore are some of the most familiar pieces. However, regardless of whether they were meant to be heard in stereo, the stereo tracks really allow the balance of the instruments to be heard. The title tracks have been included in both stereo and mono, presumably after some complaints over the Space 1999 yr 2 which said the mixing wasnt very faithful. I couldnt discern any sound effects on the >From: "Stuart" <[hidden email]> >Reply-To: [hidden email] >To: [hidden email] >Subject: [SHADO] Re: Fanderson UFO CD arrives! >Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 02:53:55 -0000 > >--- In [hidden email], "the_connoisseuruk" <peter.tessmer@n...> >wrote: > > It finally popped through my > > letterbox this morning. The > > packaging was a bit on the thin > > side, but it survived the rigour of > > the Royal Mail. Looking at the case > > it has a track listing of 27 titles > > on both CDs:1.UFO-main theme. > >With or without the sound effects? > > > > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > _________________________________________________________________ Use MSN Messenger to send music and pics to your friends http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
My UFO CD arrived this morning.
Fantastic!!! Thomas |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by the_connoisseuruk
> Let's keep this debate in context it is nice package and well
> produced, the mono mixes in my opinion are far superior to the > stereo mixes and I'm for one glad they are included. I would > have preffered more, but as alluded in the liner notes they > seem to have either been lost or the tape reused. Even though I haven't received my Fanderson UFO CD yet, I'm sure that it is an excellent product, and a "must have" item. So I hope people don't think my comments are in some way intended to slam the product. It's just that this is a discussion group, and it seems like a legitimate thing to discuss. As for the mono mixes being lost, I know this is not true, because I picked up a bootleg double CD soundtrack of UFO a few months ago, and the whole thing is in mono! You can even listen to a few tracks on my "music" page and compare them to Fanderson's stereo versions if you like. On the bootleg, there are certainly tracks which have nasty tape dropouts on them which would probably render them unusable, although if Fanderson was sucessful in using the same types of sources for IDENTIFIED and THE LONG SLEEP, then they certainly could have used them for other episodes as well. It's just interesting to note the decisions that went into making this CD. Fanderson obviously decided that the stereo versions were prefered, and the mono versions should only be used as a last resort. I'm sure that most fans are happy with that decision. However, if I was the one putting this CD together, I think I would have used the original mono mixes whenever possible, and as a last resort use the 4-track masters to try to recreate a new mono mix. Also, I think I would have tried to make it a 3 disc release instead of 2. Marc |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |