Hi, I'm new here. [wave to everybody in SHADO] I thought I'd
introduce myself. I'm Diorite - yeah, not my real name. It's my internet persona so that I can play and keep my cover as a mind- mannered geology professor during the day. One of my nightmares is to show up for class some day and have a student say, "Hey, did you see what Dr. _________ said on the internet last night? She has the hots for ___________!" Yikes! Anyway, like a lot of other folks here I watched UFO when it was on TV in the 70s. I was a high school girl at the time. Horrors! At first I was taken with Paul Foster. Yes, I can be turned by a pretty face. But I found along the way I started finding Straker much more interesting. I think the interest in Straker started with the death of his son. It was the first truly shocking thing I remember ever seeing on a TV show. I was convinced throughout that they would somehow save his son. Boy, I was wrong. It was obvious even to my teenage self that there was much more to Straker than the surface tough man. And I find that Straker is even more interesting to my other side of 50 self. I'm currently wading through archives. I keep finding myself shouting, "Wait!", only to realize the discussion is years old. After I finish my cruise through history, I'll have some observations about the show and my thoughts on things Straker. Diorite |
Hello and Welcome:
I'm a little new here myself, but this list has some really good people on it and I think as a fan of the show you will find out a lot of things you didn't know before. I'm sure that Marc will be on soon to say hello and to let you know where his great (IMHO) web site is. If you would like to share your observations about Straker or any other characters, please feel fee to do so! While there are many on this list who are into making models of the equipment in the show, I liked it for it's premise, it's characters and some of the risks they took as far as story lines go, especially for 1969, when it was filmed. Wendy ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Diorite Gabbro
Hi Diorite, I must say I shared your experience of reading the archives and continually realising the discussions were years old very frustrating - LOL! [:))] I'm looking forward to reading your comments on the characterisations, especially dear old 'Straker'. I just wanted to mention about another discussion group for admirers of Ed Bishop, if you (or anybody) is interested in joining. It's called "EdBishopFans" and is a Yahoo group like SHADO. I know Marc won't mind - he's a member! It was originally set up to showcase Ed Bishop's career and still does stand as testament to his life's work, despite his passing [:(] I'm planning to post a fairly lengthy discussion of the 'Straker' character on there that was printed many years ago, with a view of opening up an episode-by-episode discussion of the character and his interactions with others in the series, in as much detail as you like! I'll post a link to the group in another message. Please do come and join us as well as SHADO! [:D] Sarah In [hidden email], "Diorite" <diorite@...> wrote: > And I find that Straker is even more interesting to my other side of > 50 self. I'm currently wading through archives. I keep finding > myself shouting, "Wait!", only to realize the discussion is years > old. After I finish my cruise through history, I'll have some > observations about the show and my thoughts on things Straker. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Hi, Here's the promised link: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> [:)] Sarah --- In [hidden email], "moonbasegirl" <shaded2cinders@...> wrote: > I'm planning to post a fairly lengthy discussion of the 'Straker' > character on there that was printed many years ago, with a view of > opening up an episode-by-episode discussion of the character and his > interactions with others in the series, in as much detail as you like! > I'll post a link to the group in another message. Please do come and > join us as well as SHADO! [:D] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by moonbasegirl
> I must say I shared your experience of reading the archives and
> continually realising the discussions were years old very frustrating - > LOL! Newcomers are certainly welcome to add their comments about old topics. After all, I think most everything that could possibly be discussed about UFO has already been discussed here sometime in the past 13 years, but of course we have different people subscribed now, so the discussion may still be new and interesting to these people. And old-timers probably won't mind a bit of repitition... as long as you are asking what "FAB" means... :-) Marc |
Administrator
|
> And old-timers probably
> won't mind a bit of repitition... as long as you are asking what "FAB" > means... :-) ooops... I meant "as long as your are NOT asking what FAB means"... Only 2 days until the Australian UFO DVD release! Marc |
Marc Martin wrote:
> > And old-timers probably >> won't mind a bit of repitition... as long as you are asking what "FAB" >> means... :-) > > ooops... I meant "as long as your are NOT asking what FAB means"... Marc, your "oops" forgot to correct spelling. Welcome, Diorite. The world needs more geologists. Paul the spelling Nazi |
In reply to this post by moonbasegirl
Thanks for the warm welcome.
I've read some of the discussion about various airing orders. I saw UFO in Houston (Texas, if you need that part). It came on right after the 6 O'clock news, it seems like a Tuesday or Wednesday night. I don't remember much about the order, but I'm pretty sure that Paul Foster was there a lot sooner than episode 4 and "Exposed" was shown later, which confused me. It was pretty obvious that the episodes weren't shown in order. Diorite |
In reply to this post by moonbasegirl
Okay, Ive realized Im just not going to be able to
finish the archives before this next bit comes out. If I dont say it soon to someone, Im going to burst! After finally getting the DVDs, I had an epiphany while watching Confetti Check A-OK. Its something my younger self would never have seen. Ive got to share it. Its been stated that becoming commander of SHADO changed Straker. Confetti Check A-OK is the essential episode for seeing who Ed Straker was before SHADO and it is here more than any other episode how he became the man he was when UFO started. The picture isnt always pretty. Who was Ed Straker before SHADO? The best evidence comes from the section of the story from the wedding through to the early end of the honeymoon. Someone said he was a little shy. Id never thought of it that way, but perhaps. According to the chronologies Ive been reading, Straker would have been almost 30 when he got married. This could be a shy man. Seeing him at the reception, I thought he was maybe a little uncomfortable being the focus of attention. He was madly in love with his bride. He was warm, playful, funny, and affectionate in the following scenes. In rare other instances, weve seen where he has concern for and sensitivity to the feelings of others. The timing of Ed and Marys wedding it appalling. The day after they are married, while at the airport waiting to leave on their honeymoon, Straker is summoned to see Henderson, where he finds out he is to present final arguments for SHADO at the UN. If hed known in just a couple of days hed be appointed the commander of SHADO, he might not have married her. While at the UN, we and the committee see the passion Straker feels for SHADOs mission. That seals his fate. It appears that he is haunted by the bodies of the dead. The conflicts that develop between Ed and Mary are painful to watch because of the realistic way they play out. We see her become shriller and more demanding and emotionally needy as he becomes more consumed with his work. What bothers me most about the arguments we see is that he is always more concerned about her feelings than she ever is about his. (Okay, it was the end of the 60s, men didnt have feelings then! Just kidding!). He is quick to apologize when he realizes hes screwed up. In the argument about next hell just not come home at all, hes quickly remorseful for what he said about maybe not coming home would be better and apologizes, but she never apologizes to him for what she said, which was just as hateful. (Can you tell I cant stand her?) There are what I think are key scenes in the transformation of Straker. One is where Mary asks Ed what is more important to him, her or whatever he does until 3 Oclock in the morning. Ed gives her a look. I hadnt necessarily given it that much significance as a teenager, but now I think that is the first hint he has that the answer isnt one he or she will like. Mary goes on to tell him if he wants to be a real father to their son, he better decide while he still has a choice. He looks stricken. The decision about his family isnt one he wants to make. He still wants a home and family. Irony, irony. He has his final staff meeting, the one at Ninas apartment. He goes home thinking things are finally going to get better. Shes leaving. Her mother has done her worst. I think he really was going to spill all of the beans if only she had been willing to listen. She screams hysterically and he slaps her. There is an exchange of looks and she shakes her head. Then you see a realization dawn on his face. I think its finally dawned on him how much he has been hurting her without realizing it. He acquiesces to her leaving. She falls down the stairs. Moving to the hospital. Straker stands staring out into the rain. The whole world cries for him as his marriage stands in shambles, his wife and child in danger. What is he thinking? This was the point of the epiphany. Hes not just worrying, which I thought as a kid. In another episode, Straker tells Foster he solves a lot of problems by just sitting and thinking about them. Hes thinking about his problem. He now knows hes hurting Mary badly, however much he loves her. She made him mad enough he lost his soon-legendary control, slapping her. This is the point where the Straker we know is born. He realizes the only thing he can do for Mary out of love is let her go. He cant give enough of himself to be a decent husband. As awful as it is, and as much as he loves Mary, saving the world from UFOs is more important to him than his marriage or his life. Only his job is important and he shuts himself off from emotion. Cold logic will make his choices. End of episode. We now know everything we need to know about Straker. Diorite |
In reply to this post by Diorite Gabbro
In a message dated 9/1/2007 9:04:30 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [hidden email] writes: I've read some of the discussion about various airing orders. I saw UFO in Houston (Texas, if you need that part). It came on right after the 6 O'clock news, it seems like a Tuesday or Wednesday night. I don't remember much about the order, but I'm pretty sure that Paul Foster was there a lot sooner than episode 4 and "Exposed" was shown later, which confused me. It was pretty obvious that the episodes weren't shown in order. Actually, on the US DVD set, "Exposed" is the 4th episode shown. At least I think it is. I don't have the DVD's in front of me and it's 5:00 am on a Sunday. ;-) Wendy ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
I think you missed Diorite's point. Having recently acquired the DVDs, she KNOWS that 'Exposed" is the fourth episode of the set. Her point was that in Houston, where she originally saw the show, she remembered Foster appearing earlier in the series, and 'Exposed' appearing much later than the 4th episode. Girls. : )
Jeff [hidden email] wrote: In a message dated 9/1/2007 9:04:30 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [hidden email] writes: I've read some of the discussion about various airing orders. I saw UFO in Houston (Texas, if you need that part). It came on right after the 6 O'clock news, it seems like a Tuesday or Wednesday night. I don't remember much about the order, but I'm pretty sure that Paul Foster was there a lot sooner than episode 4 and "Exposed" was shown later, which confused me. It was pretty obvious that the episodes weren't shown in order. Actually, on the US DVD set, "Exposed" is the 4th episode shown. At least I think it is. I don't have the DVD's in front of me and it's 5:00 am on a Sunday. ;-) Wendy ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Diorite Gabbro
Diorite:
That was an amazing analysis of the Straker character! I'm not going to reprint the whole thing due to space restrictions, but there are two things I would like to mention. Yes, Mary married a military man, and she should know that his time could never really be his own and that he could be called away on short notice and be gone for a long time. But that could put a major strain on a marriage, especially if someone is pregnant and feels she is being cheated on and lied to, with promises being broken on a regular basis. I don't remember if they married before SHADO was in the making or not. But if he knew about SHADO and it's importance, then getting married was the worse possible thing he could to. If SHADO came about after his marriage, then I can only feel sorry for a man put in an impossible situation. Wendy ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Diorite Gabbro
In a message dated 9/2/2007 5:40:27 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[hidden email] writes: I don't remember if they married before SHADO was in the making or not. But if he knew about SHADO and it's importance, then getting married was the worse possible thing he could to. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IIRC, Straker expected that Henderson would be made the commander of SHADO; he never expected that he himself would be in charge or that he would be involved to such an extent that it would disrupt his marriage. Evelyn Duncan [hidden email] Cats are love on four legs. - Richard Torregrossa ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour |
In reply to this post by wenrose222
Accorging to "Confetti Check A-OK", SHADO was begining to beeing set
up when Mary and Ed married... but she was never told about it as it was a classified project... hoewever Ed did think aboput telling her about it but relented after discussing it with Alec... as S.H.A.D.O. and it's security people would have then had to "work her over". Yes, Mary knew she was marying a military man, involved in a "big" project... but then again, there's big, and there's BIG (as far as how time consuming ect it would be for Ed). But, beyond that, the pics that her detective showed her, making it look like Ed was seeing another woman, that was the last straw. but it had nothing to do with SHADO per say. --- In [hidden email], wenrose222@... wrote: > > Diorite: > > That was an amazing analysis of the Straker character! I'm not going to > reprint the whole thing due to space restrictions, but there are two things I > would like to mention. > > Yes, Mary married a military man, and she should know that his time could > never really be his own and that he could be called away on short notice and be > gone for a long time. But that could put a major strain on a marriage, > especially if someone is pregnant and feels she is being cheated on and lied to, > with promises being broken on a regular basis. > > I don't remember if they married before SHADO was in the making or not. But > if he knew about SHADO and it's importance, then getting married was the worse > possible thing he could to. If SHADO came about after his marriage, then I > can only feel sorry for a man put in an impossible situation. > > Wendy > > > > > > ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all- new AOL at > http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
In reply to this post by Diorite Gabbro
Diorite, That was an incredible analysis of Commander Straker. And I believe you are right on the money with it. And let's give a round of applause to Ed Bishop, a fine actor who was able to pull that off so effectively.....Man I wish they had made more episodes! Thank you for some wonderful insight Jim ____________________________________________________________________________________ Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 |
In reply to this post by brandykitt
--- [hidden email] wrote:
> In a message dated 9/2/2007 5:40:27 P.M. Central > Daylight Time, > [hidden email] writes: > I don't remember if they married before SHADO was > in the making or not. But > if he knew about SHADO and it's importance, then > getting married was the > worse > possible thing he could to. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > IIRC, Straker expected that Henderson would be made > the commander > of SHADO; he never expected that he himself would be > in charge or that > he would be involved to such an extent that it would > disrupt his marriage. > > Evelyn Duncan > [hidden email] That's the way I see it, too. Straker never imagined that the responsibility for getting SHADO up and running would be his. He was the hard-working underling and that's how he expected to continue. And then there's what Henderson expected. Henderson had expected Ed to win support for SHADO from the UN committee. I dont think he foresaw the committee giving Ed command, though. However, Henderson doesnt seem upset with the decision because Straker has been a good subordinate, probably doing most of the work, being a team player, taking orders. He assumes Ed will continue to follow his lead, so he (Henderson) will still be in command except in name only. I dont think Henderson expects that Straker will come into his own as a commander and excel, taking SHADO in directions Henderson never foresaw and cant control except with purse strings. I think that is the friction that we see later. Diorite |
In reply to this post by Diorite Gabbro
In a message dated 9/5/2007 7:25:04 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [hidden email] writes: And then there's what Henderson expected. Henderson had expected Ed to win support for SHADO from the UN committee. I don’t think he foresaw the committee giving Ed command, though. However, Henderson doesn’t seem upset with the decision because Straker has been a good subordinate, probably doing most of the work, being a team player, taking orders. He assumes Ed will continue to follow his lead, so he (Henderson) will still be in command except in name only. I don’t think Henderson expects that Straker will come into his own as a commander and excel, taking SHADO in directions Henderson never foresaw and can’t control except with purse strings. I think that is the friction that we see later. Diorite But that type of situation can be hell on a marriage, ask any military spouse or corporate executive. Mary expected to have a marriage that somewhat resembled the way she was courted by Ed. When Ed became head of SHADO and had to start keeping very big secrets from her, her reactions were probably very normal under the circumstances. Being pregnant didn't make it any easier. When her mother got evidence that Ed might be seeing another woman (Nina Barry,who was there at the start of SHADO), I don't think any woman in Mary's position would have acted different. She left him. And Ed could not change anything, because his is a job you can't leave. One other point, I don't think that Straker ever expected to be the head of SHADO. That happened after the UFO attack on the car with Henderson and Straker. As I can recall, Henderson was injured very badly and the projectwas given to Straker on the premise that Henderson could no longer function doing the command responsibilities that SHADO required. Wendy ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
--- [hidden email] wrote: > But that type of situation can be hell on a > marriage, ask any military > spouse or corporate executive. Mary expected to have > a marriage that somewhat > resembled the way she was courted by Ed. When Ed > became head of SHADO and had to > start keeping very big secrets from her, her > reactions were probably very > normal under the circumstances. When I first wrote my comments I actually wrote a long, rambling commentary on "Confetti Check". It was too long, and I cut it down a lot. Some of what I said is appropriate here. I blame Mary for the demise of the Straker marriage, obviously. Coming down on her hardest comes from the fact that it appears to me she was just giving lip service to understanding his job from the start. And, I confess, I'm also hard on her because Straker is my favorite character. ;D But there are others who share in the blame. One may surprise at least a couple of folks. One of the people I hold partially responsible is Alec Freeman. So let's look at the scene: Alec and Ed are touring the headquarters nearing completion. Alec asks about Mary and Ed gives the usual platitudes, then takes it back and says Mary's problem #1. He closes the door. Then Ed reveals a young husband's anguish over how to handle the problem. He's asking his best friend for help. My gut feeling is that baring his personal problems isn't a common thing for Straker even when things were better. Ed wants to tell Mary enough to help her understand why is he working such ridiculous hours. Alec's response? Don't tell her anything. That's a help? He doomed his friend's marriage on that advice. And I realize I can't let Straker completely off the hook (as much as I might like to!). His biggest sin is his complete lack of imagination. Ed could have told Mary lot's of things without compromising SHADO's security. It could have been as simple as "I've been given a lot more responsibility. There's something very important I have to accomplish and I'm going to have to work almost 24 hours a day for some time to do it. I'd rather be here with you, but people (or my country) are counting on me." And then he could quote a little poetry to her - the poem I have in mind goes something like "I could not love, thee, near so well, my dear, loved I not honor more". (Just don't vilify me for a misquote, I haven't read it in decades!) Even though Mary saw the evidence that suggest Ed was having an affair, I don't think the marriage was irrevocably over. She woke up in the hospital wanting Ed. He probably had a chance to explain then if he had been there. It's that darned Alec Freeman again! But if Straker had decided he needed to let Mary go, the easiest way to do it would be to let her continue to think he has been unfaithful. She would be hurt, but she could feel justified in kicking Ed to the curb. And she wouldn't know it was ultimately Ed's decision. Diorite, overinterpreting and loving it |
In a message dated 9/6/2007 8:45:47 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [hidden email] writes: And I realize I can't let Straker completely off the hook (as much as I might like to!). His biggest sin is his complete lack of imagination. Ed could have told Mary lot's of things without compromising SHADO's security. It could have been as simple as "I've been given a lot more responsibility. There's something very important I have to accomplish and I'm going to have to work almost 24 hours a day for some time to do it. I'd rather be here with you, but people (or my country) are counting on me." And then he could quote a little poetry to her - the poem I have in mind goes something like "I could not love, thee, near so well, my dear, loved I not honor more". (Just don't vilify me for a misquote, I haven't read it in decades!) Even though Mary saw the evidence that suggest Ed was having an affair, I don't think the marriage was irrevocably over. She woke up in the hospital wanting Ed. He probably had a chance to explain then if he had been there. It's that darned Alec Freeman again! Diorte: I was in a situation similar to what we have been discussing. I gave my husband the choice of me or the 24/7/365. He was not in the military, but once was ordered back to work during a vacation, leaving me alone in Germany (Where he wanted to go) where I did not speak the language and having a Jewish background, was very uncomfortable, so say the least. His boss gave my husband the same choice. He chose me. BUT in SHADO land, once you are in, your in. I doubt Freeman could get into the middle of the marriage unless he was allowed to - by Straker, and because Straker already know in his heart the you can't have two marriages's - Mary and SHADO. Ed had to make a choice and saving the earth was saving the lives of the people he loved. Wendy ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by wenrose222
Here I sit, watching the first episode again. I've
watched in a couple of times closely now. Gee, I'm even all of the way up to 2004 in the archives, so I have a fair idea of a lot of what has been discussed. Let's see if I can come up with anything that hasn't been mentioned before. Well, it's a pilot episode. It does what pilot episodes do. As a teen I was grabbed by the teaser, then it was "What the heck?" when we suddenly jump to the studio. I remember it taking me a couple of minutes to realize we were watching the same guy we saw thrown out of the car in the wreck. Rugs. More rugs in this show that in the mansion in "Dynasty". Of course, there's Straker's platinum blond wig. And the first instance where the wig didn't quite cover up the fact of Ed Bishop's much darker natural hair color. There is Alec's wig, which is actually pretty good but there is something funky about the hair line. And then the one I hadn't noticed until I heard Wanda Ventham on her commentary - yes, Virginia, you are wearing a hair piece in this episode to give you the big hair. LOL. Did anybody else ever notice that the pants legs on Straker's off-white jump suit are held down by black elastic straps under the shoes? I don't think they did that on any of his other costumes, but that one they did. Peter Gordeno looked exceptionally fine in those off-white pants and mesh shirt. Yum. Ah, the joys of dry ice! It's what makes that lovely boiling effect in the water after the UFO crashes. I've seen comments about Straker throwing the cigar butt on the ground when he first gets out of the car and the rude blowing of ash off of his desk onto poor Alec the Letch. I also notice that Straker leaves his briefcase for Miss Ealand to bring in. Did they ever give her a first name? I really liked her character. Anyway, they seem to set off to make Straker as obnoxious as humanly possible right from the start. But we also get the first glimpse of the softer side of Straker. It's at the end when he conveys his condolences to Capt. Carlin. Then he wanted to spare him the details of his sister's demise. And then there is the comment about the aliens coming from a dying planet, its resources exhausted. Ah, echoes of the early days of environmentalism. So, did I find anything new? Diorite |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |