Here's something that just occurred to me. How and why is it that those pilots get in there and dont have pressure suits? What happens if the ship is damaged? I would love to have a Q&A with gerry! |
It seems there are quite a few instances where the pilots don't wear pressure suits: Battlestar Galactica, Star Wars, Lost in Space, etc. Doesn't make much sense to me, either. Also, for the first 25 missions of the NASA Space Shuttles, pressure suits weren't worn (unless leaving the ship) either. Jeff Brinke <[hidden email]> wrote: Here's something that just occurred to me. How and why is it that those pilots get in there and dont have pressure suits? What happens if the ship is damaged? I would love to have a Q&A with gerry! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Doesn't the new Battlestar Galactica uses pressure suits for the Vipers? George --- Jeffrey Nelson <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > It seems there are quite a few instances where the pilots don't wear > pressure suits: Battlestar Galactica, Star Wars, Lost in Space, etc. > Doesn't make much sense to me, either. Also, for the first 25 > missions of the NASA Space Shuttles, pressure suits weren't worn > (unless leaving the ship) either. > > Jeff > > Brinke <[hidden email]> wrote: > Here's something that just occurred to me. How and why is it that > those pilots get in there and dont have pressure suits? What > happens if the ship is damaged? > > I would love to have a Q&A with gerry! > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > "So remember, when you're feeling very small and insecure, How amazingly unlikely is your birth, And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space, 'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth." __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
In reply to this post by brinkeguthrie
Don't know. Haven't watched enough to notice. You're probably right. I was referring to the original. : ) Jeff Clay <[hidden email]> wrote: Doesn't the new Battlestar Galactica uses pressure suits for the Vipers? George [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In the context of the other shows that were listed, I guessed that you may have been refering to the original. So, if UFO was to be redone today, would they have pressure suits for the Interceptors? George --- Jeffrey Nelson <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Don't know. Haven't watched enough to notice. You're probably > right. I was referring to the original. : ) > > Jeff > > Clay <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Doesn't the new Battlestar Galactica uses pressure suits for the > Vipers? > > George > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > "So remember, when you're feeling very small and insecure, How amazingly unlikely is your birth, And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space, 'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth." __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ |
In reply to this post by Clay
even in the original BG, they wore pressure suits, I think I remember in the first couple of episodes, when they needed to recruit women pilots, there was a scene with the women wearing it. But its more like underwear, worn underneath the uniform. Then again... are you talking pressure suits.. helping the body cope with high g's or space suits like the Apollo astronauts wore when exploring the moon?? Bruce ----- Original Message ----- From: "Clay" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 12:26 AM Subject: Re: [SHADO] Inteceptors > > > Doesn't the new Battlestar Galactica uses pressure suits for the > Vipers? > > George > > --- Jeffrey Nelson <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > It seems there are quite a few instances where the pilots don't wear > > pressure suits: Battlestar Galactica, Star Wars, Lost in Space, etc. > > Doesn't make much sense to me, either. Also, for the first 25 > > missions of the NASA Space Shuttles, pressure suits weren't worn > > (unless leaving the ship) either. > > > > Jeff > > > > Brinke <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Here's something that just occurred to me. How and why is it that > > those pilots get in there and dont have pressure suits? What > > happens if the ship is damaged? > > > > I would love to have a Q&A with gerry! > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "So remember, when you're feeling very small and insecure, > How amazingly unlikely is your birth, > And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space, > 'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth." > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > |
In reply to this post by brinkeguthrie
--- Clay <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > In the context of the other shows that were listed, > I guessed that you > may have been refering to the original. > > So, if UFO was to be redone today, would they have > pressure suits for > the Interceptors? > > George > cockpit with little room to spare. Which may be the reason for not wearing pressurized suits at NASA also. The other reasoning may be that if something happens to a vehicle as small as an interceptor/viper the chances of the pilot surviving and the suit being undamaged suit is pretty infinitesmal. (which, yes, i probably spelled wrong ... *snerk*) if they make a UFO movie, i think the shuttle pilots will probably wear suits as will the skydiver pilots -- a little more chance of survival when hit on both of those. interceptors always struck me as the motorcycle of SHADO and they tend to not fare well when hit by much of anything. if they modified the design, it would be a whole new issue as to whether it was reasonable to put them in pressure suits. the cockpits were really tiny on those things .... well, that's dragons 2cents (ever notice that they left the cent symbol off keyboards????) laters dragon __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ |
dragon haven wrote: > well, that's dragons 2cents (ever notice that they > left the cent symbol off keyboards????) ¢You'd Think they'd know better...¢ |
In reply to this post by brinkeguthrie
the pilots/crew of the shado lunar modules did wear space suits (minus helmets) ========Original Message======== Subj: Re: [SHADO] Inteceptors Date: 14/03/2005 17:04:37 GMT Standard Time From: _dragonhavn@yahoo.com_ (mailto:[hidden email]) To: _SHADO@yahoogroups.com_ (mailto:[hidden email]) Sent on: --- Clay <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > In the context of the other shows that were listed, > I guessed that you > may have been refering to the original. > > So, if UFO was to be redone today, would they have > pressure suits for > the Interceptors? > > George > cockpit with little room to spare. Which may be the reason for not wearing pressurized suits at NASA also. The other reasoning may be that if something happens to a vehicle as small as an interceptor/viper the chances of the pilot surviving and the suit being undamaged suit is pretty infinitesmal. (which, yes, i probably spelled wrong ... *snerk*) if they make a UFO movie, i think the shuttle pilots will probably wear suits as will the skydiver pilots -- a little more chance of survival when hit on both of those. interceptors always struck me as the motorcycle of SHADO and they tend to not fare well when hit by much of anything. if they modified the design, it would be a whole new issue as to whether it was reasonable to put them in pressure suits. the cockpits were really tiny on those things .... well, that's dragons 2cents (ever notice that they left the cent symbol off keyboards????) laters dragon __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Bruce Sherman
We were referring specifically to pressurized, self contained space suits. 'Pressure suits' used to keep blood from pooling in the extremities, and starving the brain of oxygen during high 'g' maneuvers are commonly called 'g-suits'. : ) Jeff Bruce Sherman <[hidden email]> wrote: even in the original BG, they wore pressure suits, I think I remember in the first couple of episodes, when they needed to recruit women pilots, there was a scene with the women wearing it. But its more like underwear, worn underneath the uniform. Then again... are you talking pressure suits.. helping the body cope with high g's or space suits like the Apollo astronauts wore when exploring the moon?? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by brinkeguthrie
Although the astronauts HAVE been wearing pressurized space suits since the 26TH mission, but just during launch & re-entry. Jeff dragon haven <[hidden email]> wrote: --- Clay wrote: > > > In the context of the other shows that were listed, > I guessed that you > may have been refering to the original. > > So, if UFO was to be redone today, would they have > pressure suits for > the Interceptors? > > George > cockpit with little room to spare. Which may be the reason for not wearing pressurized suits at NASA also. <snip> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by SHADO
the biggest problem with the inteceptors is, of course, one and done. how could they have an airborne vehicle with one missle? the inteceptors have no defensive capability. ever see one zap an alien with a laser? nope. they hang there nekked. they need weapons. (for the movie, of course.) --- In [hidden email], Jeffrey Nelson <1shado1@s...> wrote: > > We were referring specifically to pressurized, self contained space suits. 'Pressure suits' used to keep blood from pooling in the extremities, and starving the brain of oxygen during high 'g' maneuvers are commonly called 'g-suits'. : ) > > Jeff > Bruce Sherman <brucesherman@s...> wrote: > even in the original BG, they wore pressure suits, I think I remember in the > first couple of episodes, when they needed to recruit women pilots, there > was a scene with the women wearing it. But its more like underwear, worn > underneath the uniform. > > Then again... are you talking pressure suits.. helping the body cope with > high g's or space suits like the Apollo astronauts wore when exploring the > moon?? > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by dragon haven
----- Original Message ----- From: "dragon haven" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 11:58 AM Subject: Re: [SHADO] Inteceptors > > > > > I would suspect not as they are in a pressurized > cockpit with little room to spare. Which may be the > reason for not wearing pressurized suits at NASA also. > The other reasoning may be that if something happens > to a vehicle as small as an interceptor/viper the > chances of the pilot surviving and the suit being > undamaged suit is pretty infinitesmal. (which, yes, i > probably spelled wrong ... *snerk*) > > if they make a UFO movie, i think the shuttle pilots > will probably wear suits as will the skydiver pilots > -- a little more chance of survival when hit on both > of those. interceptors always struck me as the > motorcycle of SHADO and they tend to not fare well > when hit by much of anything. if they modified the > design, it would be a whole new issue as to whether it > was reasonable to put them in pressure suits. the > cockpits were really tiny on those things .... > ------------------------------------------------------- ???? What????..... NASA shuttle launches have all crew members wearing pressurised emergency escape suits during launches and reentrys. ALL crew members might not have and use EVA suits, but they all have pressure suits. (....and these are not to be confused with G suits.) Also, a tiny cabin has nothing to do as a consideration for whether or not an occupant wears a pressure suit. Mercury astronauts wore pressure suits, and their cabin was much smaller than an Interceptor's. SR-71 pilots wear full pressure suits and their cockpit is pretty cramped as well. Try telling a pilot they're gonna fly without protection because we can't spare the room and see the reaction you'll get.... Dave H. |
In reply to this post by brinkeguthrie
--- Anthony Taylor <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > dragon haven wrote: > > well, that's dragons 2cents (ever notice that they > > left the cent symbol off keyboards????) > > ¢You'd Think they'd know better...¢. lol ... showoff --- where'd you find a keyboard with that on it? or is there some mystic combination of keys like there is for spanish n's and things? dragon __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ |
dragon haven wrote: >>¢You'd Think they'd know better...¢. > > > lol ... showoff --- where'd you find a keyboard with > that on it? or is there some mystic combination of > keys like there is for spanish n's and things? On the Mac, it's Option+4 Press both Keys at the same time. |
In reply to this post by brinkeguthrie
???? What????.....
> > NASA shuttle launches have all crew members > wearing pressurised > emergency escape suits during launches and reentrys. > ALL crew members might > not have and use EVA suits, but they all have > pressure suits. (....and these > are not to be confused with G suits.) uhm, the comment had to do with the first 26 mercury, etc launches, not current time. I know they wear them now. (dragon really has to remember to mention timeframes in the future ......) > > Also, a tiny cabin has nothing to do as a > consideration for whether or > not an occupant wears a pressure suit. Mercury > astronauts wore pressure > suits, and their cabin was much smaller than an > Interceptor's. SR-71 pilots > wear full pressure suits and their cockpit is pretty > cramped as well. ok, someone else said they didn't and due to my complete and total lack of desire to do research at this moment (i am doing quite enough research for classes right now, thank you very much *falls over laughing* ..) > > Try telling a pilot they're gonna fly without > protection because we > can't spare the room and see the reaction you'll > get.... > in the original BG they were just about that smart ... personally i hadn't really given it a lot of thought and tossed in my two cents ... teach me to say anything about techie stuff .......... *dragon looks frazzled and retreats to her lair for a plunge in the cooling pool .... * *grin* i think i'll stick to Mary arguements from now on ..... laters all dragon __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
In reply to this post by brinkeguthrie
> On the Mac, it's Option+4
> Press both Keys at the same time. ah *she said brightly* kewl. now, if SHADO had to choose between Macs and Microsoft ............... LOL *dragon dragging the missive somewhere vaguely near topid ....* dragon __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Make Yahoo! your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs |
In reply to this post by brinkeguthrie
I think Dragon's confusion stems from something I had posted earlier. In one of my first posts on this subject, I had stated that the shuttle astronauts were not required to wear pressure suits on the missions prior to the Challenger accident. But in a later post reiterating what I had said in that earlier post, I mistakenly left out the word SHUTTLE before the word ASTRONAUTS. I'm guessing Dragon was referring to that later post, and assumed that the astronauts weren't required to wear pressure suits on our first 25 missions into space from day 1, due to my omission of the word SHUTTLE (my bad). The astronauts wore pressure suits until the advent of the space shuttle, and then it was apparently felt they weren't needed. Until the Challenger tragedy. Sorry for any confusion I may have caused... Jeff dragon haven <[hidden email]> wrote: ???? What????..... > > NASA shuttle launches have all crew members > wearing pressurised > emergency escape suits during launches and reentrys. > ALL crew members might > not have and use EVA suits, but they all have > pressure suits. (....and these > are not to be confused with G suits.) uhm, the comment had to do with the first 26 mercury, etc launches, not current time. I know they wear them now. (dragon really has to remember to mention timeframes in the future ......) > > Also, a tiny cabin has nothing to do as a > consideration for whether or > not an occupant wears a pressure suit. Mercury > astronauts wore pressure > suits, and their cabin was much smaller than an > Interceptor's. SR-71 pilots > wear full pressure suits and their cockpit is pretty > cramped as well. ok, someone else said they didn't and due to my complete and total lack of desire to do research at this moment (i am doing quite enough research for classes right now, thank you very much *falls over laughing* ..) > > Try telling a pilot they're gonna fly without > protection because we > can't spare the room and see the reaction you'll > get.... > in the original BG they were just about that smart ... personally i hadn't really given it a lot of thought and tossed in my two cents ... teach me to say anything about techie stuff .......... *dragon looks frazzled and retreats to her lair for a plunge in the cooling pool .... * *grin* i think i'll stick to Mary arguements from now on ..... laters all dragon __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by dragon haven
----- Original Message ----- From: "dragon haven" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 4:47 PM Subject: Re: [SHADO] Inteceptors > > > > in the original BG they were just about that smart ... > personally i hadn't really given it a lot of thought > and tossed in my two cents ... teach me to say > anything about techie stuff .......... *dragon looks > frazzled and retreats to her lair for a plunge in the > cooling pool .... * > > *grin* > > dragon > > --------------------------------------------------------- An interesting thing about pressure suits in TV series and movies.... With the old BG, you had the pilots wearing these obnoxiously huge helmets on their heads while pulling heavy G's, and no body vacuum protection. In Space 1999, where they at least tried to make the suits look convincing, you could see though that they were nothing more than just ski snowsuits with a drop over collar for the helmet, and it was funny because when they had fights on the moon and were tossing each other around, you would see the bottoms of the collars flip up and see the actors bare necks out there on the supposed airless surface of the moon. It takes more than just velcro to make an airtight seal.... UFO, at least, seemed to somehow hold the helmet collars down with straps or something, and you never saw such gaffs, although in reality, the collar could *never* be a separate part of the suit. Now, the new BG has them in supposed full pressure suits, yet you see them get in their cockpits in coveralls and then snap on this little token of a helmet collar. An airtight helmet locking collar seal is not something you can just clip on like a bowtie; it has to be completely airtight, and hold the helmet down against 500-700 lbs of separation force. Look at a real pressure suit and see how beefy the whole construction really is. No need for the dragon to retreat to the cooling pool (????). TV and movies really tend to oversimplify things. But the reality of these things can be quite mind boggling.... Dave H. |
--- In [hidden email], "davrecon" <davrecon@n...> wrote: > But the reality of these things > can be quite mind boggling.... > > Dave H. Did you ever read Robert A Heinlein's "Have Spacesuit Will Travel"? Karen |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |