Marc,
I've been noticing the membership number going up over the holiday period - now 914 :-) What's confusing me is there has never been any "new members" listed - normally it'll say eg. "4 New Members" underneath the membership number. Are people joining without this happening, because they're not "real" members or something? Just wondering :-) Sarah |
Administrator
|
> What's confusing me is there has never been any "new members" listed -
> normally it'll say eg. "4 New Members" underneath the membership > number. > > Are people joining without this happening, because they're not "real" > members or something? Just wondering :-) Sarah, could you reword this question? I don't understand what you are asking... Marc |
--- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@u...> wrote:
> Sarah, could you reword this question? I don't understand what you > are asking... My apologies :-) Will attempt to illustrate - On my Yahoo! Groups page, this group appears like this (words only) SHADO 46 New Messages 1 New File 913 moonbasegirl [hidden email] The current membership number is 913, which shows that new members have been joining, yet on the far left, normally between the number of New Messages and New Files it would say "X" New Members, but there isn't anything! I was curious about this and wanted to ask you if it meant there actually weren't any new members at all, but the total membership number has been increasing, perhaps for some other reason? I hope this makes more sense...... :-D Sarah |
Administrator
|
> The current membership number is 913, which shows that new members
> have been joining, yet on the far left, normally between the number > of New Messages and New Files it would say "X" New Members, but there > isn't anything! Ahhh, I understand your question. I have SHADO setup to hide the list membership, so I guess when this is done, it also doesn't bother to state how many new members there are, because you wouldn't be able to see who they are. Since I'm the list moderator, when I look at my "My Groups" page, it *does* say "9 New Members" for SHADO, and I can click on that and see who they are, and they look like they are real people to me... :-) Marc |
--- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@u...> wrote:
> I have SHADO setup to hide the list membership, so I guess when >this is done, it also doesn't bother to state how many new members >there are, because you wouldn't be able to see who they are. > > Since I'm the list moderator, when I look at my "My Groups" page, > it *does* say "9 New Members" for SHADO, and I can click on that > and see who they are, and they look like they are real people to >me... I see :-) But you didn't always hide them though(?) I never realised that it would have been possible to see who new members were! I think when you did your "clearout" the number fell to about 890 or so. It was 915 when I signed in just now. Maybe some of these new members have been seeing UFO for the very first time on ITV 4! :-) Perhaps as list owner Marc, you might like to encourage them to introduce themselves? I'm not meaning to seem nosey, just this insatiable curiosity of mine :-D Thanks Marc Sarah |
> > Since I'm the list moderator, when I look at my > "My Groups" page, > > it *does* say "9 New Members" for SHADO, and I can > click on that > > and see who they are, and they look like they are > real people to > >me... Hello, I recently joined and I am - as far as I'm aware - a real person. I loved UFO first time round, and Hubby bought me the Season 1 DVD boxset for Christmas, which gave me the enthusiasm to seek out this list. Real life is very busy so I'm unlikely to do much but lurk, but I thought I'd just say hello. Sharon |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by moonbasegirl
> I see :-) But you didn't always hide them though(?) I never
> realised that it would have been possible to see who new members > were! I haven't changed any of the settings, but Yahoo does change the way YahooGroups work from time-to-time. > I think when you did your "clearout" the number fell to about 890 or > so. It was 915 when I signed in just now. Maybe some of these new > members have been seeing UFO for the very first time on ITV 4! :-) > Perhaps as list owner Marc, you might like to encourage them to > introduce themselves? I believe that all new members are sent an introductory message, where it states that people are welcome to introduce themselves to the group and tell us about their interest in UFO. I'd think that anything beyond that would be getting pushy... :-) Marc |
I was just thinking that David Essex has declined to star in BBC's EastEnders but this Actor is taking his place
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/article/ds27910.html Had Both Ed & Mike still been alive today and offered a Part and the right Money could they have found their way back onto mainstream British TV ? Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote: > I see :-) But you didn't always hide them though(?) I never > realised that it would have been possible to see who new members > were! I haven't changed any of the settings, but Yahoo does change the way YahooGroups work from time-to-time. > I think when you did your "clearout" the number fell to about 890 or > so. It was 915 when I signed in just now. Maybe some of these new > members have been seeing UFO for the very first time on ITV 4! :-) > Perhaps as list owner Marc, you might like to encourage them to > introduce themselves? I believe that all new members are sent an introductory message, where it states that people are welcome to introduce themselves to the group and tell us about their interest in UFO. I'd think that anything beyond that would be getting pushy... :-) Marc Yahoo! Groups Links --------------------------------- Play Santa's Celebrity Xmas Party, an exclusive game from Yahoo! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 19:49:38 +0000 (GMT)
Paul Williams <[hidden email]> wrote: > I was just thinking that David Essex has declined to star in BBC's > EastEnders but this Actor is taking his place > http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/article/ds27910.html > > Had Both Ed & Mike still been alive today and offered a Part and the > right Money could they have found their way back onto mainstream > British TV ? > I think virtually any money would have been the right money to be honest; Ed Bishop was a jobbing actor and a role in a soap would have been extremely welcome I'm sure. The only UFO actor I can think of who ever appeared in one of the soaps regularly is Patrick Mower (from Square Triangle). He was in Emmerdale a few years ago; maybe he still is, no idea. James -- Dig It : a forum for Euro Beatles fans - http://beatles.dyndns.org/ |
Administrator
|
> The only UFO actor I can think of who ever appeared in one of the soaps
> regularly is Patrick Mower (from Square Triangle). He was in Emmerdale > a few years ago; maybe he still is, no idea. Patrick Mower has aged well... http://www.emmerdale.org/emmerdale/profiles/rodney.htm Marc |
In reply to this post by James Gibbon
--- James Gibbon <[hidden email]> wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 19:49:38 +0000 (GMT) > Paul Williams <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > I was just thinking that David Essex has declined > to star in BBC's > > EastEnders but this Actor is taking his place > > http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/article/ds27910.html > > > > Had Both Ed & Mike still been alive today and > offered a Part and the > > right Money could they have found their way back > onto mainstream > > British TV ? > > This isn't a British soap, but the actor Stuart Damon who appeared in the episode Mindbender was (maybe still is) in the soap General Hospital. __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |