|
This whole idea of factionalism doesn't make sense for the aliens at all.
Only a planet and people united in exploiting another would be successful in any such gambit. Mind you, the series doesn't necessarily portray them as all that successful. But, in order for the real threat and fear of the aliens to be real and substantive enough for SHADO to even exist, means there has to be some sort of organization to what the aliens are doing. When I write my own fanfic, I try to make the aliens seem as organized and malevolent as possible, which heightens the fear of them and what they do, and makes the threat of what they do far more immediate. I don't portray them as buffoons who only throw 3-4 ships into the fray, I depict them as vicious cold hearted killers, doing what they do to survive, considering humans as nothing more than cattle to be utilized in any way they see fit. If the aliens are a force to be reckoned with, I don't see factionalism helping that. Factionalism would lead to a scattering of resources and energies (on which the aliens are short) and a lack of cohesiveness in their long terms aims and goals on planet earth. Making the aliens out to be idiots who can't get their collective manure together lessens their malevolence and turns them into cardbord enemies without any teeth. Pam |
|
Huh? I guess you missed the empire period in Earth history.
Anthony ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pamela McCaughey" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 9:08 PM Subject: Re: [SHADO] Re: UFO Episode Discussion -- DESTRUCTION > This whole idea of factionalism doesn't make sense for the aliens at all. > Only a planet and people united in exploiting another would be successful in > any such gambit. Mind you, the series doesn't necessarily portray them as > all that successful. But, in order for the real threat and fear of the > aliens to be real and substantive enough for SHADO to even exist, means > there has to be some sort of organization to what the aliens are doing. > > When I write my own fanfic, I try to make the aliens seem as organized and > malevolent as possible, which heightens the fear of them and what they do, > and makes the threat of what they do far more immediate. I don't portray > them as buffoons who only throw 3-4 ships into the fray, I depict them as > vicious cold hearted killers, doing what they do to survive, considering > humans as nothing more than cattle to be utilized in any way they see fit. > > If the aliens are a force to be reckoned with, I don't see factionalism > helping that. Factionalism would lead to a scattering of resources and > energies (on which the aliens are short) and a lack of cohesiveness in their > long terms aims and goals on planet earth. Making the aliens out to be > idiots who can't get their collective manure together lessens their > malevolence and turns them into cardbord enemies without any teeth. > > Pam > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > |
|
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
"Anthony D" wrote:
> Huh? I guess you missed the empire period in Earth history. > None of us have missed it, it's still alive and well. But would you mind trimming your posts a bit, to include only as much quoted text as is necessary for context? Ta :) |
|
In reply to this post by Anthony D-2
This has probably already been mentioned, but I
thought I would toot my own horn....I was watching KILL STRAKER! tonight and I noticed that the medium shot of the shuttle re-entering Earth's atmosphere at the 3.1 angle had the evil alien device from CONFLICT attatched to the bottom of it! Not once---but TWICE! Just thought I would point that out... JF ===== __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com |
|
In reply to this post by J Ramage
Just where the heck did they tuck the freezer at in their tiny ships? Even if they were only able to use one-tenth of the worlds populations' organs, that still a pretty big freezer.
Something that I don't think anyone has ever covered, since organs only last a few hours (days?) before they become useless for transplant, just how do they get them home fast enough to keep them "Good"? What about the Aliens own system rejecting the organs? Would you be able to function if you were so doped up on pain killers and Auto Immune pills, that you didn't know wether you were coming or going? Or are we getting Annal again? J Ramage <[hidden email]> wrote: >Anyone have any comments they'd like to make about DESTRUCTION? A possible theory on while the Aliens would want to wipe out their source of human bodies? I always assumed that, since it was nerve gas or nerve toxin or something being dumped, that it would kill off humanity while still leaving enough of their organs etc viable for transplant, so the aliens would just need a big enough freezer to take 'em all home in. Jess Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Robert Thomas wrote:
> Just where the heck did they tuck the freezer at in their tiny > ships? Even if they were only able to use one-tenth of the worlds > populations' organs, that still a pretty big freezer. Something > that I don't think anyone has ever covered, since organs only last > a few hours (days?) before they become useless for transplant, > just how do they get them home fast enough to keep them "Good"? > What about the Aliens own system rejecting the organs? Would you > be able to function if you were so doped up on pain killers and > Auto Immune pills, that you didn't know wether you were coming or > going? As Arthur C Clarke once said, "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". All of the issues you raise are strictly 20th Century human problems. |
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
>What about the Aliens own system rejecting the organs? Would you be >able to function if you were so doped up on pain killers and Auto >Immune pills, that you didn't know wether you were coming or going?
Maybe that's why the Aliens were always such bad shots... :-) Actually, the UFO "writers guide" said that the Aliens were 500-1000 years ahead of us in technology, and they had long ago perfected organ transplant surgery. Marc |
|
In reply to this post by jamesgibbon
'Just where the heck did they tuck the freezer at in their tiny ships?' Well, in my own fanfic, I don't portray the alien ships as being tiny. They are actually larger than tiny and in my UFO-MFU crossover, I detail the interior of a UFO and how they package the harvested organs for transport. I also depicted the alien ships as being large and weighing over 20 tons in my fanfic story Sea Poste. I submit, they were larger and had more space in their interiors than has been depicted on the series. Are there any eps which clearly show the scale size between a UFO ship and a humanoid beside it? I don't recall any, but I could be wrong..... As for alien probs with their immune systems and their bodies rejecting human organs, I submit that the reason the aliens decided to continue exploiting humans on planet earth is because our bodies proved to have the organs which required the least amount of drugs and worked well and easily with the alien bodies. I don't think earth was the first planet the aliens "preyed on", I just figured, for the sake of explanation in my fanfic, that we here on Terra Firma, provided the best match for the aliens. I'm just figuring that the aliens didn't luck out on their first try - they have had to test out some other planets - perhaps some even closer to their own home system - but came up dry. Unfortunately both for the aliens and for Earth, human organs provided the most agreeable source. Pam |
|
Hi All,
The UFO in the episode E.S.P. is a good reference for the approximate size of a typical UFO - you can quite easily compare it to the size of the house, windows are a good reference. I believe someone worked a rough estimate in earlier emails to this group. You have to remember at the time UFO was made, Dr Barnard had only just transplanted the first human heart (very contentious at the time), so the idea of more general human organ transplants was pure fiction - there are many ideas in UFO and other Anderson production that are now commonplace. The knowledge about organ rejection was very elementary, at the time Dr Barnard performed the operation, but I think it is quite/very plausible that the aliens will have mastered the technique. Another example, I always liked Straker's cordless phones in his office, not they're commonplace - I have 3 on my desk, although they're not multi-colored :) Another indication of medical advance is in Confetti Check A-OK, when Straker is adamant, no 'insists' that he will have a son, Freeman starts to say; "how do you know.." he will have a son... again, at the time, there was no positive test for sexing a baby prior to birth... Best to all, Griff -----Original Message----- From: Pamela McCaughey [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:03 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [SHADO] UFO Episode Discussion -- DESTRUCTION 'Just where the heck did they tuck the freezer at in their tiny ships?' Well, in my own fanfic, I don't portray the alien ships as being tiny. They are actually larger than tiny and in my UFO-MFU crossover, I detail the interior of a UFO and how they package the harvested organs for transport. I also depicted the alien ships as being large and weighing over 20 tons in my fanfic story Sea Poste. I submit, they were larger and had more space in their interiors than has been depicted on the series. Are there any eps which clearly show the scale size between a UFO ship and a humanoid beside it? I don't recall any, but I could be wrong..... As for alien probs with their immune systems and their bodies rejecting human organs, I submit that the reason the aliens decided to continue exploiting humans on planet earth is because our bodies proved to have the organs which required the least amount of drugs and worked well and easily with the alien bodies. I don't think earth was the first planet the aliens "preyed on", I just figured, for the sake of explanation in my fanfic, that we here on Terra Firma, provided the best match for the aliens. I'm just figuring that the aliens didn't luck out on their first try - they have had to test out some other planets - perhaps some even closer to their own home system - but came up dry. Unfortunately both for the aliens and for Earth, human organs provided the most agreeable source. Pam Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
|
--- "Griff" <griff@g...> wrote (Re: UFO Episode Discussion --
DESTRUCTION) :- > The UFO in the episode E.S.P. is a good reference for the > approximate size of a typical UFO - you can quite easily compare it > to the size of the house, windows are a good reference. ... And, in one episode, Foster gets into an alien base and finds on its floor a circular mark where UFO's landed. Is there any point any of us writing to Gerry Anderson asking him how big he intended his UFO series UFO's to be? I suppose possibily there might be some sort of space non-linearity insde the UFO so its inside is bigger than its outside, like with the Dr.Who Tardis. |
|
>And, in one episode, Foster gets into an alien base and finds on its
floor a circular mark where UFO's landed. Actually I couldn't make out what he said in either the German or English version of this until I got the DVD with subtitles. Foster says 'It's been a UFO' which confused me a little. Did he mean that the base had been made out of a UFO? Jess |
|
I always thought Foster said: "There's been a UFO", backed up by the
circular marking on the floor where the UFO had presumably landed... -----Original Message----- From: J Ramage [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:55 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [SHADO] how big is a UFO? >And, in one episode, Foster gets into an alien base and finds on its floor a circular mark where UFO's landed. Actually I couldn't make out what he said in either the German or English version of this until I got the DVD with subtitles. Foster says 'It's been a UFO' which confused me a little. Did he mean that the base had been made out of a UFO? Jess Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
|
In reply to this post by anthonyappleyard <MCLSSAA2@fs2.mt.umist.ac.uk>
If they had a portible hole, so to speak, then why not bring in more then one or two crew men/troops at a time. Seems a silly way to run a war, if you had that kind of technical advantage.
anthonyappleyard <[hidden email]> wrote:--- "Griff" wrote (Re: UFO Episode Discussion -- DESTRUCTION) :- > The UFO in the episode E.S.P. is a good reference for the > approximate size of a typical UFO - you can quite easily compare it > to the size of the house, windows are a good reference. ... And, in one episode, Foster gets into an alien base and finds on its floor a circular mark where UFO's landed. Is there any point any of us writing to Gerry Anderson asking him how big he intended his UFO series UFO's to be? I suppose possibily there might be some sort of space non-linearity insde the UFO so its inside is bigger than its outside, like with the Dr.Who Tardis. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
In reply to this post by Pam McCaughey-2
I had Forgotten about The UFO Affair until after I sent my post on the size of the UFOes.
I think that making a "standard size" UFO was not high up on Meddlings list of priorities. You can look at some of the diffrent shows and compare them to other objects, like the house in ESp or Regans car in Flightpath, yet the scale, at least to me, seems way off. Perhaps there really are two or three types of UFOes in the series as some have sugested. As for the rest about rejection, sounds good to me. |
|
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
A thousand years ahead of us in technology and they had perfected cloning or artificial organs, or large sized FTL ships. Hmm? Maybe they aren't as advanced as they think they are?
Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:>What about the Aliens own system rejecting the organs? Would you be >able to function if you were so doped up on pain killers and Auto >Immune pills, that you didn't know wether you were coming or going? Maybe that's why the Aliens were always such bad shots... :-) Actually, the UFO "writers guide" said that the Aliens were 500-1000 years ahead of us in technology, and they had long ago perfected organ transplant surgery. Marc Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
In reply to this post by jamesgibbon
Even "Magic" must have a technological base to it. And most of the advances that would have to be postulated for them to be able to surive the trip to our planet would suggest that there are easier, not to metion less expensive, ways to solve the problems.
(Yes I know I am reading the E-mails in reverse order, rather then the way them actually came in, but I am too lazy currently to go to the front of the que, which is actually the back of it.) James Gibbon <[hidden email]> wrote: As Arthur C Clarke once said, "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". All of the issues you raise are strictly 20th Century human problems. |
|
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Robert Thomas wrote:
> Even "Magic" must have a technological base to it. Yes, and that's my whole point. Just as a 17th Century locksmith wouldn't understand a smart-card key, so we can't necessarily comprehend the way the Aliens have overcome the difficulties you mentioned in your post. |
|
In reply to this post by screwedmorethenonce
"I had Forgotten about The UFO Affair until after I sent my post on the size of the UFOes. I think that making a "standard size" UFO was not high up on Meddlings list of priorities." Usually I portray the actual alien vehicles as at least house size, maybe bigger, weighing over 20 tons (after allm they'd have some sort of power source built in, propulsion units, life support, living quarters or stasis quarters for the FTL trip across the galaxy, waste disposal, and of course storage facilities for their purloined human organs and/or bodies. I also wrote about a somewhat smaller UFO in The Red Dust of Mars - one that was more like a fighter vehicle, which took on the SHADO Mars transport and caused alot of damage to the Aries Five in a firefight. Pam |
|
In reply to this post by anthonyappleyard <MCLSSAA2@fs2.mt.umist.ac.uk>
We worked this one out once, and it came back as several different sizes.
Grant. -----Original Message----- From: Robert Thomas [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: 17 July 2003 19:48 To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [SHADO] how big is a UFO? If they had a portible hole, so to speak, then why not bring in more then one or two crew men/troops at a time. Seems a silly way to run a war, if you had that kind of technical advantage. anthonyappleyard <[hidden email]> wrote:--- "Griff" wrote (Re: UFO Episode Discussion -- DESTRUCTION) :- > The UFO in the episode E.S.P. is a good reference for the > approximate size of a typical UFO - you can quite easily compare it > to the size of the house, windows are a good reference. ... And, in one episode, Foster gets into an alien base and finds on its floor a circular mark where UFO's landed. Is there any point any of us writing to Gerry Anderson asking him how big he intended his UFO series UFO's to be? I suppose possibily there might be some sort of space non-linearity insde the UFO so its inside is bigger than its outside, like with the Dr.Who Tardis. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ **************************************************************************** ******* Legally privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee(s) legally indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message, and notify us immediately. If you or your employer does not consent to Internet e-mail messages of this kind, please advise us immediately. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by West Herts College unless otherwise indicated by an authorised representative independent of this message. Please note that neither West Herts College nor I accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
In reply to this post by screwedmorethenonce
Robert Thomas <[hidden email]> wrote: A thousand years ahead of us in technology and they had perfected cloning or artificial organs, or large sized FTL ships. Hmm? Maybe they aren't as advanced as they think they are? Actually that should read HAVEN'T, insteed of had. I was getting a little ahead of myself. Sorry for the error. I have heard somewhere that we are just now discovering things that "The Old Ones" knew hundreds of years ago. I can believe it when they talk about getting cancer meds from tree bark or from other plants. Sometimes it pays to listen to folklore, and some times it doesn't. Will we hundreds of years from now, sit down with some race and go over their archives of visits to Earth, like Archer does with T'Pol? Makes you think... Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
