I didn't know Mike Billington tested for the Bond role, he would have been
infinitely better that George Lazenby. Since you asked for guesses about other cast members, I'd have to say Ed Bishop. I think I heard Gerry Anderson say in an interview about how underrated Bishop was as an actor and how he'd have made a perfect Bond. No arguments from me there, he'd have been much truer to Ian Flemming's character than Roger Moore. Straker sacrificed his own son to duty and Ed's portrayal of that alone should have guaranteed him a stellar career. |
Sorry Bill, but Ed wasn't one of the ones to test for Bond. Had he been we
would have heard it loud and strong from Amelia the resident Bishop expert. I think Ed might have made a good Bond too.(This should get Amelia to put her tuppence worth in) However it wasn't until lately that American actor have been considered for the roll. Well there was a bit of a try after the Laszanby thing to get John Gavin for the role but I think that was more talk to get Sean to return at a resonable rate. Actually the role Ed would have been ideal for I think is Bond's friend Felix Leiter. He would have been perfect for this and far better than anyone else in the role. Since you said you didn't know about Mike Billington having been tested for the role of 007 I will tell you that he tested 3 times. Once in 1971 unfortunately after Laszanby the United Artisted wanted insurance so they decided on using a known actor which is how Roger Moore got cast. The other two times were in 1978 which I find surprising after his having played the KGB agent killed by Bond at the opening of The Spy Who Loved Me. And then again in 1980. Still need the names of the other two and the two guest cast members.< g> James K. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Bill Adkins
Sorry to disagree, I love Ed in UFO , but as James Bond you must be joking.
He did not have the flare or charisma to carry it off, now Rodger Moore is not the best James Bond m but I lot better than Ed would of been. -----Original Message----- From: Bill Adkins [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: 05 July 2002 15:43 To: [hidden email] Subject: [SHADO] Re: 007 Connection I didn't know Mike Billington tested for the Bond role, he would have been infinitely better that George Lazenby. Since you asked for guesses about other cast members, I'd have to say Ed Bishop. I think I heard Gerry Anderson say in an interview about how underrated Bishop was as an actor and how he'd have made a perfect Bond. No arguments from me there, he'd have been much truer to Ian Flemming's character than Roger Moore. Straker sacrificed his own son to duty and Ed's portrayal of that alone should have guaranteed him a stellar career. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.373 / Virus Database: 208 - Release Date: 01/07/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.373 / Virus Database: 208 - Release Date: 01/07/2002 |
In reply to this post by Bill Adkins
"Bill Adkins" wrote:
> I think I heard Gerry Anderson say in an interview about how > underrated Bishop was as an actor and how he'd have made a perfect > Bond. No arguments from me there, he'd have been much truer to > Ian Flemming's character than Roger Moore. Bill - my first thought was to very much disagree with you (and Gerry apparently!) there. He just doesn't have the 'Englishness' and even if he could have got the accent right, it wouldn't have worked. He's not that 'smooth'. But there are some aspects of Fleming's 007 which he could have had a good stab at - the dour, hard-edged, occasionally cynical side. But while he's very charismatic, he's not that 'physical' - he doesn't quite have the right kind of 'presence'. Roger Moore was an awful Bond though. Timothy Dalton is the best yet (I reckon). |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by SumitonJD
> Still need the names of the other two and the two guest cast members.<
Gary Myers? David Warbeck? Patrick Allen? Michael Jayston? Marc |
In reply to this post by Bill Adkins
FYI: Pam there were two Flint movies: Our Man Flint; and, In Like Flint.
As to the Bond Movies becoming comic under Roger Moore, yes they were. I think the writers were having to write that way to suit Moore's style of acting which would be fine on stage for Bedroom Farces. James K. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Bill Adkins
Congratulations Marc you got it right.
David Warbeck and Gary Myers both tested for Bond in 1978 the same year as Micheal Billington tested for the second time. David Warbeck and Mike both tested again in 1980 as well as Michael Jayston who played Russ Stone in The Sound Of Silence. Patrick Allen who played Turner in Timelash was tested as Bond in 1962 for Dr. No. Sorry Marc, no money or prizes but you can feel good that you were the first to answer a tough UFO trivia question. James K. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Bill Adkins
I've always felt Mike B. would have made an interesting Bond. He certainly
had more emotional depth for the role than Roger Moore. I think Moore got chosen because in the 70's the Bond films swung more to the comedic, tongue in cheek type - almost parodies of the spy genre at times. Timothy Dalton and Pierce Brosnan have made the character more intense and more serious, and I think Mike would have done that had he received the role. He had that "brooding" look to him back then, as well as that fabulous body (mwa ha ha.........pardon me while I mop up the puddle of drool.......but I digress.....) and his ability to handle difficult stunts. If you've seen the KGB Wars film he did, he did ALL his own stunts, including all the motorcycle stuff. Bond movies are physical as well as psychological, so the choice for the role is often difficult to make. It will be interesting to see who gets the nod now that Brosnan considers himself "too long in the tooth" to continue. I have a friend who thinks Adrian Paul would be a good choice. Pam [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Bill Adkins
"Roger Moore was an awful Bond though. Timothy Dalton is the best yet (I
reckon)." I'm actually willing to agree with the above assessment. I felt the Bond movies themselves took a less serious turn while Moore played 007, but I never knew if he was the reason himself, or if Cubby Broccoli and the Bond people decided to change the tone of the movies. When Connery played Bond, the films were meant as serious pieces. James Coburn in fact parodied the genre in his "In Like Flint" movie (were there two of the Flint films or just one? - I can't remember). I found Moore's Bond flicks veered off into the ridiculous - more like Flint. By the time TD came along, the films got serious again. Can't say that Ed B., altho a marvellous actor, would have fit the Bond "profile". In addition to being too American, I think he would have been better fitted for other things. I think he might have made a very interesting captain of the TNG Enterprise instead of Patrick Stewart, for instance. Having played a complicated character like Straker, he would have made a super complex leader again. I always found Stewart too..................lacking in intensity. Dull as dishwater to be precise. Of course, maybe that's because I was used to Shatner as an intense Kirk both in TOS and the series of movies that followed...... Pam [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Bill Adkins
Well, Gary Myers played Lew Waterman (one of my fav UFO characters), and
Michael Jayston went on to play Nicholas II in the movie "Nicholas and Alexandra". Interestingly enough, UFO's Mike Billington played Nicholas II in a British miniseries on the life of King Edward VII - he did a fabulous job of it and looked gorgeous in the beard necessary to play the ill-fated last Tsar of Russia. I asked Mike via e-mail how he ended up playing Nicholas and he said the director chose him because his eyes bore some resemblance to the real Nicholas. Mike also said he'd gone to the former Soviet Union in the early 60's with a Shakespearean theatre troop to perform several plays there. Pam [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Bill Adkins
Thanks for confirming for me the number of Flint flicks, James. I think I
may have only seen one of them. Cute, but obviously not meant to be taken seriously. That's why the Roger Moore Bond films were so disappointing - they were full of corny jokes and gags that just didn't happen in the other Bond movies. Pam |
Hi,
Pam McCaughey schrieb: > Cute, but obviously not meant to be taken > seriously. That's why the Roger Moore Bond films were so > disappointing - they were full of corny jokes and gags > that just didn't happen in the other Bond movies. Wrong. Those were the little bits and pieces that made the Bond-movies with Moore the best there are. Especially the Brosnan-Bonds lack those gags - which makes _them_ the most disappointing. If you expected more from Brosnan, that is - like I did before I had seen "Goldeneye". For the next ones I knew to expect nothing beforehand, and that was exactly what I got with the following two. RU! |
In reply to this post by SumitonJD
find surprising after his having played
> the KGB agent killed by Bond at the opening of The Spy Who Loved Me. And > then again in 1980. Can I add a heads up here to folks on this list in the UK. The Spy Who Loved me is on ITV next Wed at 8pm. I will be watching Mike's bit then turning off to do something else. Sheila UFOite |
In reply to this post by Bill Adkins
"Pam McCaughey" wrote:
> That's why the Roger Moore Bond films were so disappointing - they > were full of corny jokes and gags that just didn't happen in the > other Bond movies. > Too right Pam - the Moore 007 era was a write-off. He was hopeless - a million miles from Ian Fleming's professional killer. Wasn't all Moore's fault though - Moonraker for example would have been a crap film with anyone playing Bond. The scripts started to get better from For Your Eyes Only, but Moore's portrayal of Bond sadly didn't. I like Roger Moore, he was a very good 'light entertainment' actor and good at the romantic stuff he also turned his hand to in his career, but for Bond, hopelessly miscast. About as dangerous as a lemon yoghurt. James |
In reply to this post by Bill Adkins
[hidden email] wrote:
> David Warbeck and Mike both tested again in 1980 as well as Michael Jayston > who played Russ Stone in The Sound Of Silence. > Michael Jayston actually played Adam Halll's masterspy 'Quiller' in a BBC TV series of the same name 20 years ago or so. Very good, I seem to recall. Never been repeated though as far as I know. Knowing the Beeb, they've probably recorded Jim'll Fix It over it or something. Very different style from Bond, though. Just checked and the TV series was actually in 1975. Ouch. |
In reply to this post by Bill Adkins
As well as the two films there was also a pilot for a TV series version of
Our Man Flint made in 1974 or ' 75 I remember seeing. Yes, the Flint films were spoofs and not very serious. There main charm was James Coburns charisma. Actually there is something about Coburn that makes me think he would have be the best person to play Felix Leiter in the Bond movies. He looks more like the character is discribed in the books. But he has that moody present on screen sort of like Ed did as Straker. Sort make me wound how Ed would have done if he had been cast in Coburn's part in The Magnificent Seven? James K. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Bill Adkins
Quiller? That would be the same Quiller from the film The Quiller
Memorandum which was written under The Pen Name Adam Hall by Elleston Trevor as The Berlin Memorandum. That's another British series we didn't get over here, darn it! It would have been most interesting. James K. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Bill Adkins
"Sheila" wrote:
. > > The Spy Who Loved me is on ITV next Wed at 8pm. I will be watching Mike's > bit then turning off to do something else. > good call. |
In reply to this post by Pam McCaughey
--- Pam wrote:
> James Coburn in fact parodied the genre in his "In Like Flint" > movie (were there two of the Flint films or just one? - I can't > remember). There were two Derek Flint films: OUR MAN FLINT (1965) and IN LIKE FLINT (1966) with James Coburn and Lee J. Cobb (remember the TV series THE VIRGINIAN?). BTW, both Flint movies will be out on DVD in America in a week or so. I've always liked the scores from Jerry Goldsmith (which is also available on CD) :-) Oh, I've getting a little bit off-topic here... sorry, Marc, ahem... {:-] Christian |
In reply to this post by Bill Adkins
I felt I had to respond to this anti-Roger Moore/Spy Who Loved Me thing. I
spent the day yesterday watching the film in the company with Caroline Munro (naomi) and the second unit director John Glen (who went on to direct all the Bonds in the 80s). It's always been my favourite Bond film (with You Only Live Twice), and its appeal hadnt diminished. Roger Moore was the only actor at the time who could have played Bond - as he was the only bankable English actor I can think of. BTW, it's the 25th anniversary TO THE DAY that Spy was released! > > The Spy Who Loved me is on ITV next Wed at 8pm. I will be watching >Mike's > > bit then turning off to do something else. > > > >good call. > _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |