In one episode Straker goes crazy and smashes through his office set revealling the cameras and we then get to see the framework set of skydiver and moonbase, we see everything which somewhat loses the magic and mystery of the show, does anyone know why this was done? why they decided to expose the behind the scenes images,of the actual UFO sets, i found it most surprising and equally disapointing! |
Administrator
|
rchrd_cmbs wrote:
>In one episode Straker goes crazy and smashes through his >office set revealling the cameras and we then get to see >the framework set of skydiver and moonbase, we see >everything which somewhat loses the magic and mystery >of the show, does anyone know why this was done? why >they decided to expose the behind the scenes images,of >the actual UFO sets, i found it most surprising and >equally disapointing! It was surprising, but I didn't find it dissapointing. MINDBENDER is one of my favorite episodes. I've read that they were running low on budget, and wanted a "low budget" episode -- one that required no new sets to be built, and no new special effects sequences. Just use what you've got. Sometimes when such a decree is made, you end up with a "flashback" episode, where they just show a lot of scenes from previous episodes. And they did that in MINDBENDER too (Straker seeing his life on film), but they were much more creative about it. Marc |
In reply to this post by rchrd_cmbs
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 13:13:59 -0000
"rchrd_cmbs" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > In one episode Straker goes crazy and smashes through his office set > revealling the cameras and we then get to see the framework set of > skydiver and moonbase, we see everything which somewhat loses the > magic and mystery of the show, does anyone know why this was done? why > they decided to expose the behind the scenes images, of the actual UFO > sets, i found it most surprising and equally disapointing! > Yes, I totally agree, Richard. It's meant to represent a hallucination of course; the episode you're referring to is 'Mindbender'. However, no viewer can possibly have watched it without thinking "well, that's the actual Moonbase set" and so on; the magic and illusion of UFO is deconstructed before our very eyes. It was an original idea, but one which failed. Although it's well-regarded by some fans, it's actually a rather poor episode. James -- Dig It : a forum for Euro Beatles fans - http://beatles.dyndns.org/ |
I agree it a very poor episode, and it does deconstruct the "magic",
its a particular episode and a scene that I rather tat had not been comitted film - to me it smacked of the series running out of ideas. > Yes, I totally agree, Richard. It's meant to represent a hallucination > of course; the episode you're referring to is 'Mindbender'. However, no > viewer can possibly have watched it without thinking "well, that's the > actual Moonbase set" and so on; the magic and illusion of UFO is > deconstructed before our very eyes. It was an original idea, but one > which failed. Although it's well-regarded by some fans, it's actually a > rather poor episode. > > James |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
--- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@u...> wrote:
> It was surprising, but I didn't find it dissapointing. > MINDBENDER is one of my favorite episodes. Mine too, Marc! And since I'm a behind-the-scenes junkie (which is why I buy all my dvds with special features!), I thought it was awesome to see the actual sets they worked on! I'd always wondered how they managed that circular set for the Moonbase command sphere! A really fun episode! Yours, Denise
Straker, somehow it's always about you.
|
In reply to this post by lunadude2001 <russell_smith@ntlworld.com>
The only thing I liked about it was Stuart Damon. I liked him in Champions and his two time appearance on Space 1999. Did not like him on General Hospital. Too generic a character in my opinion.
lunadude2001 <[hidden email]> wrote:I agree it a very poor episode, and it does deconstruct the "magic", its a particular episode and a scene that I rather tat had not been comitted film - to me it smacked of the series running out of ideas. > Yes, I totally agree, Richard. It's meant to represent a hallucination > of course; the episode you're referring to is 'Mindbender'. However, no > viewer can possibly have watched it without thinking "well, that's the > actual Moonbase set" and so on; the magic and illusion of UFO is > deconstructed before our very eyes. It was an original idea, but one > which failed. Although it's well-regarded by some fans, it's actually a > rather poor episode. > > James Yahoo! Groups Links signature test'; "> --------------------------------- Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Denise Felt
Count me in as another UFO fan who enjoyed watching MINDBENDER. I
didn't find it disappointing at all. I especially like the part where "Mike" corrected Straker after he called him Paul. Isn't this nice? Some of the folks here like it, some don't. Everybody gets to participate and nobody's left out. Cheers! ~Jeanster |
--- In [hidden email], "jeanster911" <jeanster911@y...> wrote:
> > Count me in as another UFO fan who enjoyed watching MINDBENDER. > Some of the folks here like it, some don't. > Everybody gets to participate and nobody's left out. Jean, I found that to be very true when I did a survey to find out the favorite episodes of the group a long while ago. Opinions were WIDELY different! I ended up doing the survey on favorite scenes instead, since these were easier for people to be definite about liking or disliking. It's cool to hear everyone's reasons for liking (or hating) an episode, though, because it gives you a glimpse inside their thoughts while watching the show. Yours, Denise
Straker, somehow it's always about you.
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |