I'm just curious why SID is called a "Space Intruder Detector" rather than a "Space Invader Detector" or a "Space Invasion Detector." Surely the aliens haven't travelled millions of miles for a mere 'intrusion' like a bunch of party gatecrashers?
All The Best, BRIAN [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Hi,
I suppose it is a matter of semantics. Occasionally, the aliens attack as singletons or pairs (one or two aliens per UFO), so I think it more correct to call that case an "intruder" or "intruders". Surely, "invader" and hence invasions have a different connotation. I suppose it is possible to be "invaded" by one individual, but an actual "invasion" implies a large number of "invaders" ... such as say the Vikings. BTW, Paul Foster's hallucination WAS most certainly gatecrashed by a bunch of alien invaders! If it had happened at Sylvia's party and not the sauna, that would have been one hell of a party, with more than a few hangovers...i.e. OMG, what the he&% did I drink at Sylvia's party... at one point I thought I'd been abducted by aliens... DOH! Regards :) Griff --- In [hidden email], Brian Serridge <brianserridge@...> wrote: > > I'm just curious why SID is called a "Space Intruder Detector" rather than a "Space Invader Detector" or a "Space Invasion Detector." Surely the aliens haven't travelled millions of miles for a mere 'intrusion' like a bunchof party gatecrashers? > > All The Best, > > BRIAN |
In reply to this post by Brian Serridge
--- In [hidden email], Brian Serridge <brianserridge@...> wrote: > > I'm just curious why SID is called a "Space Intruder Detector" rather than a "Space Invader Detector" or a "Space Invasion Detector." Surely the aliens haven't travelled millions of miles for a mere 'intrusion' like a bunchof party gatecrashers? > > All The Best, > > BRIAN > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
Maybe because the intent of the Aliens to invade is not in evidence. They
are not setting up a beachhead or attempting to take over political power or annex territory, unlike the Visitors in 'V' (BTW - I much preferred the original 80s series of 'V' to the revival ). So as the Alien's reasons for violating Earth territory is not invasion, but the procurement of replacement organs and perhaps other activities, Intruder is a more correct term. Much the same as someone trespassing is not necessarily a burglar or home invader if the intent to steal or usurp your property rights is not the motivation for the act of trespass. Regards From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of BillC Sent: Friday, 23 April 2010 11:31 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: [SHADO] Re: SPACE INTRUDER DETECTOR --- In [hidden email] <mailto:SHADO%40yahoogroups.com> , Brian Serridge <brianserridge@...> wrote: > > I'm just curious why SID is called a "Space Intruder Detector" rather than a "Space Invader Detector" or a "Space Invasion Detector." Surely the aliens haven't travelled millions of miles for a mere 'intrusion' like a bunch of party gatecrashers? > > All The Best, > > BRIAN > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Brian Serridge
So who should play Space Intruder/invader Detector in the movie ?
Paul Sent from my iPhone On 23 Apr 2010, at 16:23, "David Richards" <[hidden email] > wrote: > Maybe because the intent of the Aliens to invade is not in evidence. > They > are not setting up a beachhead or attempting to take over political > power or > annex territory, unlike the Visitors in 'V' (BTW - I much preferred > the > original 80s series of 'V' to the revival ). > > So as the Alien's reasons for violating Earth territory is not > invasion, but > the procurement of replacement organs and perhaps other activities, > Intruder > is a more correct term. > > Much the same as someone trespassing is not necessarily a burglar or > home > invader if the intent to steal or usurp your property rights is not > the > motivation for the act of trespass. > > Regards > > From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf > Of > BillC > Sent: Friday, 23 April 2010 11:31 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: [SHADO] Re: SPACE INTRUDER DETECTOR > > --- In [hidden email] <mailto:SHADO%40yahoogroups.com> , Brian > Serridge <brianserridge@...> wrote: > > > > I'm just curious why SID is called a "Space Intruder Detector" > rather than > a "Space Invader Detector" or a "Space Invasion Detector." Surely > the aliens > haven't travelled millions of miles for a mere 'intrusion' like a > bunch of > party gatecrashers? > > > > All The Best, > > > > BRIAN > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > British understatement > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
I vote for Ben Patrick Johnson. He is the voice for most of the movie trailers you here these days.
Mark-Allen ________________________________ From: Paul Burns <[hidden email]> To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]> Sent: Fri, April 23, 2010 9:01:40 AM Subject: Re: [SHADO] Re: SPACE INTRUDER DETECTOR So who should play Space Intruder/invader Detector in the movie ? Paul Sent from my iPhone On 23 Apr 2010, at 16:23, "David Richards" <dcr_au@virginbroadb and.com.au > wrote: > Maybe because the intent of the Aliens to invade is not in evidence. > They > are not setting up a beachhead or attempting to take over political > power or > annex territory, unlike the Visitors in 'V' (BTW - I much preferred > the > original 80s series of 'V' to the revival ). > > So as the Alien's reasons for violating Earth territory is not > invasion, but > the procurement of replacement organs and perhaps other activities, > Intruder > is a more correct term. > > Much the same as someone trespassing is not necessarily a burglar or > home > invader if the intent to steal or usurp your property rights is not > the > motivation for the act of trespass. > > Regards > > From: SHADO@yahoogroups. com [mailto:SHADO@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf > Of > BillC > Sent: Friday, 23 April 2010 11:31 PM > To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com > Subject: [SHADO] Re: SPACE INTRUDER DETECTOR > > --- In SHADO@yahoogroups. com <mailto:SHADO% 40yahoogroups. com> , Brian > Serridge <brianserridge@ ...> wrote: > > > > I'm just curious why SID is called a "Space Intruder Detector" > rather than > a "Space Invader Detector" or a "Space Invasion Detector." Surely > the aliens > haven't travelled millions of miles for a mere 'intrusion' like a > bunch of > party gatecrashers? > > > > All The Best, > > > > BRIAN > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > British understatement > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by paulhburns
Whomsoever it is should have a Mel-ifluous Oxlian voice.
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Paul Burns Sent: Saturday, 24 April 2010 1:32 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [SHADO] Re: SPACE INTRUDER DETECTOR So who should play Space Intruder/invader Detector in the movie ? Paul Sent from my iPhone On 23 Apr 2010, at 16:23, "David Richards" <[hidden email] <mailto:dcr_au%40virginbroadband.com.au> > wrote: > Maybe because the intent of the Aliens to invade is not in evidence. > They > are not setting up a beachhead or attempting to take over political > power or > annex territory, unlike the Visitors in 'V' (BTW - I much preferred > the > original 80s series of 'V' to the revival ). > > So as the Alien's reasons for violating Earth territory is not > invasion, but > the procurement of replacement organs and perhaps other activities, > Intruder > is a more correct term. > > Much the same as someone trespassing is not necessarily a burglar or > home > invader if the intent to steal or usurp your property rights is not > the > motivation for the act of trespass. > > Regards > > From: [hidden email] <mailto:SHADO%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:[hidden email] <mailto:SHADO%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf > Of > BillC > Sent: Friday, 23 April 2010 11:31 PM > To: [hidden email] <mailto:SHADO%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [SHADO] Re: SPACE INTRUDER DETECTOR > > --- In [hidden email] <mailto:SHADO%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:SHADO%40yahoogroups.com> , Brian > Serridge <brianserridge@...> wrote: > > > > I'm just curious why SID is called a "Space Intruder Detector" > rather than > a "Space Invader Detector" or a "Space Invasion Detector." Surely > the aliens > haven't travelled millions of miles for a mere 'intrusion' like a > bunch of > party gatecrashers? > > > > All The Best, > > > > BRIAN > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > British understatement > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Brian Serridge
You need someone with a deep, authoritative voice, such as
Christopher Judge or James Earl Jones. Evelyn Duncan [hidden email] "All work and no play pretty much sums it up, doesn't it?" -- Tim Hunter In a message dated 4/23/2010 11:48:23 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [hidden email] writes: So who should play Space Intruder/invader Detector in the movie ? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
> You need someone with a deep, authoritative voice, such as
> Christopher Judge or James Earl Jones. Is anyone going to believe in a "talking satellite" in this day and age? That concept worked in the 1960's, but I'm not so sure it'll work today. Marc |
But we have talking Sat Navs... and you'd need some means to get the information out. I understand what you mean Marc, but I can't see any way round it, unless they have a manned satellite. But James Earl JOnes... Oooooh Lovely lovely voice!
--- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@...> wrote: > > > You need someone with a deep, authoritative voice, such as > > Christopher Judge or James Earl Jones. > > Is anyone going to believe in a "talking satellite" in > this day and age? That concept worked in the 1960's, but I'm > not so sure it'll work today. > > Marc > |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
I think people will believe in a talking computer then not. We were brought up on Star Trek and they did this in other movies too. Who remembers HAL ?? ;)
Bruce ----- Original Message ----- From: Marc Martin To: [hidden email] Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 2:46 PM Subject: Re: [SHADO] SPACE INTRUDER DETECTOR > You need someone with a deep, authoritative voice, such as > Christopher Judge or James Earl Jones. Is anyone going to believe in a "talking satellite" in this day and age? That concept worked in the 1960's, but I'm not so sure it'll work today. Marc [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:46:24 -0700
"Marc Martin" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > You need someone with a deep, authoritative voice, such as > > Christopher Judge or James Earl Jones. > > Is anyone going to believe in a "talking satellite" in > this day and age? That concept worked in the 1960's, but I'm > not so sure it'll work today. > Is there ever a suggestion that SID can engage in meaningful conversation? I think SID works more or less like a Sat Nav, in that it has a vocabulary and grammar strictly limited to its role. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |