Hello,
As I understand it, the British media corporation that now has the rights to UFO, produces many current TV programs. It wouldn't be a joke to say that UFO was ahead of its time. Perhaps they don't understand the true potential of UFO. Any comments would be greatly appreciated. Stephen |
Administrator
|
Stephen writes:
>As I understand it, the British media corporation that now has the >rights to UFO, produces many current TV programs. It wouldn't be a >joke to say that UFO was ahead of its time. Perhaps they don't >understand the true potential of UFO. Any comments would be greatly >appreciated. Yes, I'm sure that someone *could* take UFO's original premise, update it, and make a new series. But what are the chances that it would have the same "magic" that the original series did, which only came about by having just the right combination of people working on the series at just the right point in their careers, combined with being made in an era which had certain hopes & expectations for the future? -- Marc Martin, [hidden email] |
Marc Martin wrote:
> > Yes, I'm sure that someone *could* take UFO's original premise, > update it, and make a new series. But what are the chances that > it would have the same "magic" that the original series did, > which only came about by having just the right combination of > people working on the series at just the right point in their > careers, combined with being made in an era which had certain > hopes & expectations for the future? > I must agree with Marc. It's gone, and we can't ever get it back! I'd personally welcome a remade UFO, even with some of the original cast playing older versions of their original characters, but, a bit like Star Trek TNG, we'd like it for different reasons than the first series and there's no possibility that the flavour of the original would be recaptured, imho. It would be great to see the old concept given new life in some way, but I don't think it's very likely that a new series based on the original UFO will ever be made, unfortunately. James |
In reply to this post by Stephen Greaney
Hi Stephen - I'm a UFO fan from Canada. It's my understanding from some UFO
sites I visited lately that an attempt to resurrect the series took place in '96 - but the Aussie film-maker couldn't get the required $$ together to do it. I also love Star Trek, and figure if they could bring it back to the big screen (i.e. movies) and then create 3 more "incarnations" of Trek, than UFO is definitely a worthy successor. Since the original UFO was supposed to take place in the 1980's, place the new series in the 2010's, and update everything. I understand Ed Bishop was interested in "coming aboard" the project as General Straker (guess he got Henderson's job?) in '96. E-mail me at [hidden email] with your comments - I'd love to hear from another UFO fan. Pam McCaughey, editor Atlantic, Brunswick and New England Business Journals ---------- >From: "Stephen Greaney" <[hidden email]> >To: [hidden email] >Subject: [SHADO] What are the chances of a new UFO series? >Date: Sat, Oct 28, 2000, 12:20 AM > >Hello, > >As I understand it, the British media corporation that now has the >rights to UFO, produces many current TV programs. It wouldn't be a >joke to say that UFO was ahead of its time. Perhaps they don't >understand the true potential of UFO. Any comments would be greatly >appreciated. > >Stephen > > > > > > |
In reply to this post by Stephen Greaney
Hi Marc - I'm a Canadian UFO fan - wanted to comment on your view written
below. While I agree that The Original UFO is probably like the Original Trek, I still see the show having merit, and if it has survived in fan memory and enthusiasm for 30 yrs (this yr in fact), then it deserves its chance, like Trek to find new incarnations. I agree that we fans will likely prefer the original, and a new and improved series won't be the same, BUT the idea of UFO, like Trek, is one that captured people's imagination - oddly for widely divergent reasons. An updated UFO has possibilities, such as an uneasy truce with the aliens, an all out war, etc. There have been many SF series which have come and gone on less of a premise than UFO (i.e. Cattlecar Elaxative - aka Battlestar Galactica, Roddenberry's Earth: Final Conflict, War of the Worlds, et al). I'd welcome some commentary back on this, I am, Pamela McCaughey, editor, Atlantic, Brunswick and New England Business Journals ---------- >From: James Gibbon <[hidden email]> >To: [hidden email] >Subject: Re: [SHADO] What are the chances of a new UFO series? >Date: Sat, Oct 28, 2000, 1:58 PM > >Marc Martin wrote: > >> >> Yes, I'm sure that someone *could* take UFO's original premise, >> update it, and make a new series. But what are the chances that >> it would have the same "magic" that the original series did, >> which only came about by having just the right combination of >> people working on the series at just the right point in their >> careers, combined with being made in an era which had certain >> hopes & expectations for the future? >> > >I must agree with Marc. It's gone, and we can't ever get it >back! I'd personally welcome a remade UFO, even with some >of the original cast playing older versions of their original >characters, but, a bit like Star Trek TNG, we'd like it for >different reasons than the first series and there's no >possibility that the flavour of the original would be >recaptured, imho. It would be great to see the old concept >given new life in some way, but I don't think it's very likely >that a new series based on the original UFO will ever be made, >unfortunately. > >James > > > > |
"Pam McCaughey" wrote:
> Hi Marc - I'm a Canadian UFO fan - wanted to comment on your view written > below. While I agree that The Original UFO is probably like the Original > Trek, I still see the show having merit, and if it has survived in fan > memory and enthusiasm for 30 yrs (this yr in fact), then it deserves its > chance, like Trek to find new incarnations. I agree that we fans will likely > prefer the original, and a new and improved series won't be the same, BUT > the idea of UFO, like Trek, is one that captured people's imagination - > oddly for widely divergent reasons. Hi Pam, I totally agree, personally that a new series of UFO in some form would be great. I don't think it's likely to happen because of the relatively low commercial appeal - UFO being a 'cult classic' rather than a household name like Star Trek - and because the premise of the series, being set in 1980 creates a problem. If the new series of UFO were to be set 30 years later than the original - ie 2010, then we have the problem that the intervening thirty years have to closely follow real life, because most of the audience will have lived through twenty of them! And of course we also know that real life 1980 wasn't very much like UFO's version of 1980, and not only because of the absence of invaders from another world. No widespread adoption of nehru jackets as business clothes, no jet-powered futuristic cars, etc etc, not to mention some of the technology like the mobile rocket launcher seen in The Long Sleep. Of course this vision of 1980 is one of the things that makes UFO so much fun thirty years later, but it does also present a rather intractable problem in terms of any production of a sequel. At best you'd have to have an 'alternative universe' scenario which would take the edge off the drama a bit (imo), and which a lot of the potential audience would find a bit hard to swallow. Cheers James |
In reply to this post by Stephen Greaney
Hi James:
You do have some tetchy probs there with the last 20 yrs technology thingy - but I've been working on a fanfiction story which not only incorporates much of the last 20 yrs technology, but gives us legitimate reasons for how SHADO adapted and improved much of that real technology to keep them miles ahead of NASA, ESA, and of course the aliens. Remember, this is s-f, and in that realm, we can make just about anything happen! As for the clothing, etc - well, there was alot of weird thread in the 80's and since the story took place in Britain, we can gloss over that issue entirely. As for the cars, Straker and Foster's vehicles looked suspiciously like a limited edition car called a DeLorean which was made in North America gullwing doors and all. Rocket launchers? Don't kid yourself, they've been in usage by the Russians in Afghanistan and the Americans in Saudi Arabia. Don't you think SHADO could afford to buy that kind of hardware? No alternate universes are necessary! If you're interested in how I handle some of these issues, I can e-mail you my story draft when I get further along. Ciao for now! Pam ---------- >From: James Gibbon <[hidden email]> >To: [hidden email] >Subject: Re: [SHADO] What are the chances of a new UFO series? >Date: Mon, Oct 30, 2000, 3:51 PM > >"Pam McCaughey" wrote: >> Hi Marc - I'm a Canadian UFO fan - wanted to comment on your view written >> below. While I agree that The Original UFO is probably like the Original >> Trek, I still see the show having merit, and if it has survived in fan >> memory and enthusiasm for 30 yrs (this yr in fact), then it deserves its >> chance, like Trek to find new incarnations. I agree that we fans will likely >> prefer the original, and a new and improved series won't be the same, BUT >> the idea of UFO, like Trek, is one that captured people's imagination - >> oddly for widely divergent reasons. > >Hi Pam, > >I totally agree, personally that a new series of UFO in some form >would be great. I don't think it's likely to happen because of >the relatively low commercial appeal - UFO being a 'cult classic' >rather than a household name like Star Trek - and because the >premise of the series, being set in 1980 creates a problem. If >the new series of UFO were to be set 30 years later than the >original - ie 2010, then we have the problem that the intervening >thirty years have to closely follow real life, because most of >the >audience will have lived through twenty of them! And of course >we also know that real life 1980 wasn't very much like UFO's >version of 1980, and not only because of the absence of invaders >from another world. No widespread adoption of nehru jackets >as business clothes, no jet-powered futuristic cars, etc etc, >not to mention some of the technology like the mobile rocket >launcher seen in The Long Sleep. Of course this vision of 1980 >is one of the things that makes UFO so much fun thirty years >later, but it does also present a rather intractable problem in >terms of any production of a sequel. At best you'd have to >have an 'alternative universe' scenario which would take the edge >off the drama a bit (imo), and which a lot of the potential >audience would find a bit hard to swallow. > >Cheers >James > > > > > > |
Hi Pam, > Straker and Foster's vehicles looked suspiciously like a limited edition car > called a DeLorean which was made in North America gullwing doors and all. > Rocket launchers? Don't kid yourself, they've been in usage by the Russians > in Afghanistan and the Americans in Saudi Arabia. Don't you think SHADO > could afford to buy that kind of hardware? No alternate universes are > necessary! If you're interested in how I handle some of these issues, I can > e-mail you my story draft when I get further along. > Perhaps I used the wrong expression when I said 'rocket launcher'! I'm not referring to the ubiquitous shoulder-fired weapon widely used in various conflicts ever since the 1960s, but the thing which Straker has delivered to the farm house to launch the alien bomb safely out of the atmosphere in The Long Sleep. Sort of a 'portable Cape Canaveral' .. :) You have a point about the DeLorean (I think it was actually made in the UK at one point!) and there have been other gull-wing door cars, but the overall impression of UFO with the cars, the cordless phones, the clothes and everything else is a bit overwhelming to gloss over successfully in a credible TV production in my opinion. Not that I wouldn't LOVE to see it attempted anyway, just that I don't think it would happen, sadly! I'd love to read a draft of your story, and in fact Deborah Rorabaugh maintains a 'SHADO library' - details & link on Marc's site - which you might submit it to when it's complete. Regards from London James |
In reply to this post by Pam McCaughey
Hi Pam, Perhaps I used the wrong expression when I said 'rocket launcher'! I'm not referring to the ubiquitous shoulder-fired weapon widely used in various conflicts ever since the 1960s, but the thing which Straker has delivered to the farm house to launch the alien bomb safely out of the atmosphere in The Long Sleep. Sort of a 'portable Cape Canaveral' .. :) You have a point about the DeLorean (I think it was actually made in the UK at one point!) and there have been other gull-wing door cars, but the overall impression of UFO with the cars, the cordless phones, the clothes and everything else is a bit overwhelming to gloss over successfully in a credible TV production in my opinion. Not that I wouldn't LOVE to see it attempted anyway, just that I don't think it would happen, sadly! I'd love to read a draft of your story, and in fact Deborah Rorabaugh maintains a 'SHADO library' - details & link on Marc's site - which you might submit it to when it's complete. Regards from London James |
In reply to this post by Stephen Greaney
"Pam McCaughey" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> As for the clothing, etc - > well, there was alot of weird thread in the 80's and since the story took > place in Britain, we can gloss over that issue entirely. ??? > As for the cars, > Straker and Foster's vehicles looked suspiciously like a limited edition car > called a DeLorean which was made in North America gullwing doors and all. The DeLorean factory was in Northern Ireland although I think a few were assembled in the USA. Jez -- |
In reply to this post by Stephen Greaney
> An updated UFO has possibilities, such as an uneasy truce with the aliens,
See http://www.buckrogers.demon.co.uk/ufo/end.txt and http://www.buckrogers.demon.co.uk/ufo/end2.txt for one possible outcome. See Batz Goodfortune ([hidden email])'s UFO2005 series in the SHADO Library for another. But preferably not Gerry Anderson's unrealistic original idea of SHADO trying to continue the war on the Moon after it has got blown fer away from Earth and therefore out of reach of supply craft, and anyway the aliens wouldn't have to go near the Moon to reach Earth. > ... War of the Worlds ... What was this? H.G.Wells's idea of an attack from Mars? Or what? > ... And of course we also know that real life 1980 wasn't very much like UFO's > version of 1980, and not only because of the absence of invaders > from another world. ... If the UFO series scenario was reality, we still would think that there were no invaders from another world, because SHADO would keep such events hidden. > but the overall impression of UFO with the cars, the cordless phones, the > clothes and everything else is a bit overwhelming to gloss over successfully > in a credible TV production in my opinion. But there ARE cordless (= mobile) phones now!!! |
In reply to this post by Stephen Greaney
Hi Anthony - the key to "glossing over" some of these techno-wonders is to
accept that SHADO had them BEFORE the rest of the world did! - As for Space: 1999 - let's not even go there - I bet Martin Landau never puts it on his resume..........echh. Pam McCaughey ---------- >From: "Anthony Appleyard" <[hidden email]> >To: [hidden email] >Subject: [SHADO] Re: What are the chances of a new UFO series? >Date: Tue, Oct 31, 2000, 4:49 AM > >> An updated UFO has possibilities, such as an uneasy truce with the aliens, > >See http://www.buckrogers.demon.co.uk/ufo/end.txt >and http://www.buckrogers.demon.co.uk/ufo/end2.txt >for one possible outcome. > >See Batz Goodfortune ([hidden email])'s UFO2005 series in the SHADO >Library for another. > >But preferably not Gerry Anderson's unrealistic original idea of SHADO trying >to continue the war on the Moon after it has got blown fer away from Earth and >therefore out of reach of supply craft, and anyway the aliens wouldn't have to >go near the Moon to reach Earth. > >> ... War of the Worlds ... > >What was this? H.G.Wells's idea of an attack from Mars? Or what? > >> ... And of course we also know that real life 1980 wasn't very much like UFO's >> version of 1980, and not only because of the absence of invaders >> from another world. ... > >If the UFO series scenario was reality, we still would think that there were >no invaders from another world, because SHADO would keep such events hidden. > >> but the overall impression of UFO with the cars, the cordless phones, the >> clothes and everything else is a bit overwhelming to gloss over successfully >> in a credible TV production in my opinion. > > But there ARE cordless (= mobile) phones now!!! > > > > |
In reply to this post by Stephen Greaney
Hey Jez - thanks for letting me know where the DeLorean plant was - that
makes it even easier to "say" Straker's car was a prototype or something of DeLorean's. I was nmot aware of the plant being in N. Ireland! See what we can learn from the Net? Thanks, Pam ---------- >From: Jeremy Rogers <[hidden email]> >To: [hidden email] >Subject: Re: [SHADO] What are the chances of a new UFO series? >Date: Mon, Oct 30, 2000, 5:41 PM > > "Pam McCaughey" <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> As for the clothing, etc - >> well, there was alot of weird thread in the 80's and since the story took >> place in Britain, we can gloss over that issue entirely. > >??? > >> As for the cars, >> Straker and Foster's vehicles looked suspiciously like a limited edition car >> called a DeLorean which was made in North America gullwing doors and all. > >The DeLorean factory was in Northern Ireland although I think a few >were assembled in the USA. > >Jez >-- > > > > |
In reply to this post by Stephen Greaney
Hi James: I discovered via another UFO fan this am that the DeLoreans were
made in a plant in N. Ireland! Talk about convenience for a storyline! As for the other techno-wonders, cordless phones, et al - very easy - SHADO had techno items YEARS before the general public - makes sense, doesn't it? After all, their research people were supposed to be a cut above regular industry. I'll certainly send along a draft of my little story once I get it more fully fleshed out. Because the techo-issue seems to be uppermost in UFO fan minds vis a vis a series renewal, I am really making sure I address/explain these things. Regards, Pam ---------- >From: [hidden email] >To: [hidden email] >Subject: Re: [SHADO] What are the chances of a new UFO series? >Date: Mon, Oct 30, 2000, 4:46 PM > > >Hi Pam, > >Perhaps I used the wrong expression when I said 'rocket >launcher'! I'm not referring to the ubiquitous shoulder-fired >weapon widely used in various conflicts ever since the 1960s, >but the thing which Straker has delivered to the farm house >to launch the alien bomb safely out of the atmosphere in The >Long Sleep. Sort of a 'portable Cape Canaveral' .. :) > >You have a point about the DeLorean (I think it was actually >made in the UK at one point!) and there have been other >gull-wing door cars, but the overall impression of UFO with >the cars, the cordless phones, the clothes and everything >else is a bit overwhelming to gloss over successfully in a >credible TV production in my opinion. Not that I wouldn't >LOVE to see it attempted anyway, just that I don't think it >would happen, sadly! > >I'd love to read a draft of your story, and in fact Deborah >Rorabaugh maintains a 'SHADO library' - details & link on >Marc's site - which you might submit it to when it's complete. > >Regards from London James > > > > > > |
In reply to this post by Stephen Greaney
---------- >From: "Pam McCaughey" <[hidden email]> >To: [hidden email] >Subject: Re: [SHADO] Re: What are the chances of a new UFO series? >Date: Tue, Oct 31, 2000, 8:43 AM > >Hi Anthony - the key to "glossing over" some of these techno-wonders is to >accept that SHADO had them BEFORE the rest of the world did! - As for Space: >1999 - let's not even go there - I bet Martin Landau never puts it on his >resume..........echh. > >Pam McCaughey >---------- >>From: "Anthony Appleyard" <[hidden email]> >>To: [hidden email] >>Subject: [SHADO] Re: What are the chances of a new UFO series? >>Date: Tue, Oct 31, 2000, 4:49 AM >> > >>> An updated UFO has possibilities, such as an uneasy truce with the aliens, >> >>See http://www.buckrogers.demon.co.uk/ufo/end.txt >>and http://www.buckrogers.demon.co.uk/ufo/end2.txt >>for one possible outcome. >> >>See Batz Goodfortune ([hidden email])'s UFO2005 series in the SHADO >>Library for another. >> >>But preferably not Gerry Anderson's unrealistic original idea of SHADO trying >>to continue the war on the Moon after it has got blown fer away from Earth and >>therefore out of reach of supply craft, and anyway the aliens wouldn't have to >>go near the Moon to reach Earth. >> >>> ... War of the Worlds ... >> >>What was this? H.G.Wells's idea of an attack from Mars? Or what? >> >>> ... And of course we also know that real life 1980 wasn't very much like UFO's >>> version of 1980, and not only because of the absence of invaders >>> from another world. ... >> >>If the UFO series scenario was reality, we still would think that there were >>no invaders from another world, because SHADO would keep such events hidden. >> >>> but the overall impression of UFO with the cars, the cordless phones, the >>> clothes and everything else is a bit overwhelming to gloss over successfully >>> in a credible TV production in my opinion. >> >> But there ARE cordless (= mobile) phones now!!! >> >> >> >> > > > |
In reply to this post by Stephen Greaney
---------- >From: "Pam McCaughey" <[hidden email]> >To: [hidden email] >Subject: Re: [SHADO] What are the chances of a new UFO series? >Date: Tue, Oct 31, 2000, 8:49 AM > >Hey Jez - thanks for letting me know where the DeLorean plant was - that >makes it even easier to "say" Straker's car was a prototype or something of >DeLorean's. I was nmot aware of the plant being in N. Ireland! See what we >can learn from the Net? > >Thanks, Pam >---------- >>From: Jeremy Rogers <[hidden email]> >>To: [hidden email] >>Subject: Re: [SHADO] What are the chances of a new UFO series? >>Date: Mon, Oct 30, 2000, 5:41 PM >> > >> "Pam McCaughey" <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> As for the clothing, etc - >>> well, there was alot of weird thread in the 80's and since the story took >>> place in Britain, we can gloss over that issue entirely. >> >>??? >> >>> As for the cars, >>> Straker and Foster's vehicles looked suspiciously like a limited edition car >>> called a DeLorean which was made in North America gullwing doors and all. >> >>The DeLorean factory was in Northern Ireland although I think a few >>were assembled in the USA. >> >>Jez >>-- >> >> >> >> > > > |
In reply to this post by Stephen Greaney
---------- >From: "Pam McCaughey" <[hidden email]> >To: [hidden email] >Subject: Re: [SHADO] What are the chances of a new UFO series? >Date: Tue, Oct 31, 2000, 8:54 AM > >Hi James: I discovered via another UFO fan this am that the DeLoreans were >made in a plant in N. Ireland! Talk about convenience for a storyline! As >for the other techno-wonders, cordless phones, et al - very easy - SHADO had >techno items YEARS before the general public - makes sense, doesn't it? >After all, their research people were supposed to be a cut above regular >industry. I'll certainly send along a draft of my little story once I get it >more fully fleshed out. Because the techo-issue seems to be uppermost in UFO >fan minds vis a vis a series renewal, I am really making sure I >address/explain these things. > >Regards, Pam >---------- >>From: [hidden email] >>To: [hidden email] >>Subject: Re: [SHADO] What are the chances of a new UFO series? >>Date: Mon, Oct 30, 2000, 4:46 PM >> > >> >>Hi Pam, >> >>Perhaps I used the wrong expression when I said 'rocket >>launcher'! I'm not referring to the ubiquitous shoulder-fired >>weapon widely used in various conflicts ever since the 1960s, >>but the thing which Straker has delivered to the farm house >>to launch the alien bomb safely out of the atmosphere in The >>Long Sleep. Sort of a 'portable Cape Canaveral' .. :) >> >>You have a point about the DeLorean (I think it was actually >>made in the UK at one point!) and there have been other >>gull-wing door cars, but the overall impression of UFO with >>the cars, the cordless phones, the clothes and everything >>else is a bit overwhelming to gloss over successfully in a >>credible TV production in my opinion. Not that I wouldn't >>LOVE to see it attempted anyway, just that I don't think it >>would happen, sadly! >> >>I'd love to read a draft of your story, and in fact Deborah >>Rorabaugh maintains a 'SHADO library' - details & link on >>Marc's site - which you might submit it to when it's complete. >> >>Regards from London James >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > |
In reply to this post by anthonyappleyard <MCLSSAA2@fs2.mt.umist.ac.uk>
"Anthony Appleyard" wrote:
> But there ARE cordless (= mobile) phones now!!! > Hi Anthony, yes there are NOW, but my point is that there weren't in 1980. James |
In reply to this post by Pam McCaughey
"Pam McCaughey" wrote:
> Hi James: I discovered via another UFO fan this am that the DeLoreans were > made in a plant in N. Ireland! Talk about convenience for a storyline! As > for the other techno-wonders, cordless phones, et al - very easy - SHADO had > techno items YEARS before the general public - makes sense, doesn't it? It does, and it's certainly in keeping with the original series where it's obvious that SHADO's hardware is way ahead of that of other military organisations (remember the 'what the devil's that!!?' exclamation from the British Naval captain in 'Destruction' when he sees Sky One burst from the surface of the ocean for example). BUT.. it's evident that a lot of the futuristic hardware was in general use. As an example there's a scene where Straker goes to a bar and uses a rather natty looking compact cordless phone with no antenna. I think Miss Ealand has one on her desk as well, and ostensibly she's the secretary to a film studio head. Cheers James |
In reply to this post by jamesgibbon
James Gibbon wrote: > "Pam McCaughey" wrote: > > Hi Marc - I'm a Canadian UFO fan - wanted to comment on your view written > > below. While I agree that The Original UFO is probably like the Original > > Trek, I still see the show having merit, and if it has survived in fan > > memory and enthusiasm for 30 yrs (this yr in fact), then it deserves its > > chance, like Trek to find new incarnations. I agree that we fans will likely > > prefer the original, and a new and improved series won't be the same, BUT > > the idea of UFO, like Trek, is one that captured people's imagination - > > oddly for widely divergent reasons. I totally agree with Pams comments above. I still see the show having merit, seeing as it has survived in fan memory. andenthusiasm for 30 years. When I recently joined this fantastic site, I said I wish someone would do a new U.F.O, using all the old stars etc. As I said before, I felt totally cheated when U.F.O disappeared off of our screens, and was replaced with Space 1999, still o.k viewing, but a poor replacement for U.F.O. I longed to see Ed Bishop, Michael Billington and the old cast back. They made my child hood. I would like to see U.F.O back on our screens, but mainly as a tribute to Ed Bishop and remaining cast members, without them it wouldn't be the same. They deserve it. The fantastic acting, the excitement, etc. made you feel you were watching a more expensive program. Imagine what they could come up with now, with effects etc. I have been looking frantically for as many films with dear Ed in. Although he appears with big stars in many films, he's hardly there at all. The only film I've seen him, in with more than a don't blink, or you'll miss him, is The Amazing Mrs Pollifax, Highly entertaining. I would love Ed to have the recognition he deserves, from the rest of the public. We know he's brilliant, that's why we have been fans all these years. Let's see if we can get him on our T.V screens again. Chase up the people who made Pollifax. etc. Let's get together and write to all concerned. Get him in more dramas, comedys etc. We have more power these days. We let U.F.O slip away all those years ago. Think how many other U.F.O fans out there, who don't have the Internet etc. who don't know sites like this are operating. We need to reach them. Has anyone wrote to their T.V magazines, books etc. or Mr. Anderson asking for more of Ed Bishop etc? I'm new to all this, you may have done this before! Let me know, Best Wishes Teresa. > > > Hi Pam, > > I totally agree, personally that a new series of UFO in some form > would be great. I don't think it's likely to happen because of > the relatively low commercial appeal - UFO being a 'cult classic' > rather than a household name like Star Trek - and because the > premise of the series, being set in 1980 creates a problem. If > the new series of UFO were to be set 30 years later than the > original - ie 2010, then we have the problem that the intervening > thirty years have to closely follow real life, because most of > the > audience will have lived through twenty of them! And of course > we also know that real life 1980 wasn't very much like UFO's > version of 1980, and not only because of the absence of invaders > from another world. No widespread adoption of nehru jackets > as business clothes, no jet-powered futuristic cars, etc etc, > not to mention some of the technology like the mobile rocket > launcher seen in The Long Sleep. Of course this vision of 1980 > is one of the things that makes UFO so much fun thirty years > later, but it does also present a rather intractable problem in > terms of any production of a sequel. At best you'd have to > have an 'alternative universe' scenario which would take the edge > off the drama a bit (imo), and which a lot of the potential > audience would find a bit hard to swallow. > > Cheers > James |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |