I'm not familiar with anything military so from the previous discussion am I right in thinking that once someone retires from service they keep their rank and title? For example if you were Col. Smith while serving would you still be called Col. Smith when retired or does your rank retire with you and you're known as Mr. Smith? Karen |
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 20:42:23 -0000
"raribear" <[hidden email]> wrote: > I'm not familiar with anything military so from the previous > discussion am I right in thinking that once someone retires from > service they keep their rank and title? For example if you were Col. > Smith while serving would you still be called Col. Smith when retired > or does your rank retire with you and you're known as Mr. Smith? > Well in the UK I believe you are entitled to keep the title when you retire from the services as an officer at a certain rank - hence the Major in 'Fawlty Towers'. Not sure at which rank this becomes effective - possibly Captain or Major, and the equivalent in the other services. I expect something similar applies in the US and other countries. |
In reply to this post by raribear
I think the rule is that when you are no longer in the military you no longer called by your rank. There is an exception. This is for high ranking officers. Now you don't see people being called Lt. Smith or Capt. Brown when they get out(this was all explained that while Captain Peacock on Are You Being Served has continued to use his rank he should not be doing so an it is a snobbish affectation on his part. But in the case of officers of at least the rank of General and possibly Colonels it is allowed and is done as a sign of respect for their service. I think however it is a case of what the person perfers be be addressed as. I have a retired General in the family and he is just called by his name with out the rank. James K. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by raribear
living near the town of Alamogordo, NM which is not
only home to Holloman AFB, but a huge number of retired military (mostly AF) personnel, it is allowable for Lt. Col. and above to still use the rank, followed by the word retired. Lt. Col. Wm. Franklin (retired) ... usually in print rather than when vocally addressed. Case in point, there is a retired Lt. Col. in town who has this designation on his checks. it's probable that the people who use the title when addressing him are old friends (and they'd say "Col. Franklin!" or something similar when seeing him or introducing him to others and then drop this throughout the rest of the conversation). It used to be common to refer to high ranking non coms by their title after they retired, but only in formal situations or by old friends. In sweet Straker's case, there is the confusion of him being "retired" but still active and I agree, it's probably more like the Captain of a ship who's true rank is something else, but as commander of the ship, he/she (pirates had female captains! ... whups, tangent!) is Captain. (come to think of it, sometimes when being introduced, it's "rank" so-and-so, Captain of the USS Whatsit. (yes, i know, there is no USS Whatsit .. LOL) Mostly, I think we have tvland confusion with the writers going "it's sci fi, no one's gonna worry if we get the ranks right. make it sound good." of course, consistency from week to week would be nice. *chuckle* Pam: Thanks for the vote of confidence. *blush* dragon __________________________________ Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/ |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |