ultramannick <[hidden email]>
answered bedsitter's comment: ><<We look beyond surfaces, we find >him attractive, we aren't concerned about age, we >cherish being his >friends or fans, we value his soul. >> > >That smells of idol worship, IMO. Actually, he's an atheist. To him, he doesn't have a soul. Denise _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Straker, somehow it's always about you.
|
Administrator
|
Hi all,
A couple of weeks ago there was a brief discussion of the theme for the second series of the Japanese series "Big O", and a brief clip from the theme was heard. I bought the soundtrack CD and the CD single from this show, and one of the most glaring ripoff parts we didn't hear before is at the very end. Listen: http://ufoseries.com/bigo.mp3 The above is from the CD single, which also contains the theme from the first series, which is a glaring ripoff of Queen's "Flash Gordon" theme. The Big O soundtrack album has a much longer version of the above UFO theme, and then a couple reworked, slower variations as well (kind of like the UFO theme had a few variations heard in the series). Marc |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
ultramannick <[hidden email]>
kindly wrote: >I think the previous poster was saying that perhaps >they were disappointed that Ed the man was not like Ed >the character that they watched on TV. That is the >problem in most convention situations; fans cannot >seperate the actors from the characters they play on >TV. Actually, the main reason I never wanted to meet Ed Bishop was because I knew very well that he was NOT like the character Straker, having seen him in other movies, read interviews, etc. However, several of you guys informed me before last year's Con that he was "such a great guy" that I was quite startled by his coldness. Since absolutely no one else at the Con reacted to the fans that way, I'm forced to agree with his own description of himself. And no, it wasn't just me who found him that way. Complaints were rampant among the fans throughout the Con about his lack of professionalism. (But you're right about crazy fans who don't know a great character from a great person. There were the usual number of psychotic women running everywhere trying to stand close to him.) I spent my time more wisely, talking to David Lane, Gerry Anderson, and Dolores Mantez, who were a lot of fun. And the other fans at the Con were by far the neatest people I've met yet at a Sci-fi Con, so I had a wonderful time. In fact, the only blot in the entire weekend was meeting Bishop. But I appreciate your sympathy, even if it was misplaced in this instance. Denise _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Straker, somehow it's always about you.
|
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
I would think that after thirty years he might just be a little bored and
give little importance to the raving of fans. Remember that we UFO fans saw a different product than the actors did. Being on the inside isn't the same as watching from the outside, and to them at the time it was just another job. I could easily understand that someone has little "passion" for a job hey did 30 years ago.... He shows up because it's expected, anticipated, and perhaps is convinced he should...that doesn't mean he truly wants to be there 30 years later... Mary -----Original Message----- From: Denise Felt [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Sun 3/23/2003 9:02 AM To: [hidden email] Cc: Subject: Re: [SHADO] Re: Ed Bishop First Person Quiz ultramannick <[hidden email]> kindly wrote: >I think the previous poster was saying that perhaps >they were disappointed that Ed the man was not like Ed >the character that they watched on TV. That is the >problem in most convention situations; fans cannot >seperate the actors from the characters they play on >TV. Actually, the main reason I never wanted to meet Ed Bishop was because I knew very well that he was NOT like the character Straker, having seen him in other movies, read interviews, etc. However, several of you guys informed me before last year's Con that he was "such a great guy" that I was quite startled by his coldness. Since absolutely no one else at the Con reacted to the fans that way, I'm forced to agree with his own description of himself. And no, it wasn't just me who found him that way. Complaints were rampant among the fans throughout the Con about his lack of professionalism. (But you're right about crazy fans who don't know a great character from a great person. There were the usual number of psychotic women running everywhere trying to stand close to him.) I spent my time more wisely, talking to David Lane, Gerry Anderson, and Dolores Mantez, who were a lot of fun. And the other fans at the Con were by far the neatest people I've met yet at a Sci-fi Con, so I had a wonderful time. In fact, the only blot in the entire weekend was meeting Bishop. But I appreciate your sympathy, even if it was misplaced in this instance. Denise _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Marc Martin wrote:
> >Hm, sounds like Bill Shatner. A jerk off stage, jovial > >on stage. > > I didn't find him to be a jerk at all when I saw him at Century > 21. He seemed like he was being nice & friendly with everyone. I > think he must be moody or something, because sometimes we hear > good things at one con, and then other times we had bad things at > another con. > When I met him by chance about 18 months ago, I definitely didn't get the impression that he was a 'jerk'. He looked a little wary when I went up to say hi, but I didn't have an anorak on at the time, and once he realised that I was normal and just wanted to exchange a few words, (yes, normal) he was very polite and friendly. SciFi fans can be a bit obsessive and I'm sure he has an understandable fear of being engaged in conversation by complete strangers about alien spacesuits or his favourite Nehru. But he's only human, and I'm sure he CAN be an ass at times, same as everyone else. Even I can. |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
"MCCAUG" wrote:
> It's really too bad that our hero in real life isn't that nice. or doesn't > seem to be. I'm always disappointed if people I admire turn out to be turds > (can I say that on this site?). I've heard tons of bad press about Shatner, > who has been, of late, trying to correct his public persona and even doing > movies based on spoofing himself. Altho I've never met Mike Billington in > person, his e-mails show a sense of humour and he answers them post-haste As a matter of fact, I think that Michael's emails may be 'ghost-written' by somebody else, a chap called Michael Mannion. |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
"Griff" wrote:
> Er.. correction... "some" 'fans cannot seem to seperate the > actors from the characters they play on TV' ;) > That's true, George Sewell said the same thing in an interview years ago, and at one time he didn't do conventions for that reason. UFO was a job to him, he just learned his lines and did his stuff in front of the camera. He was considerably less interested in UFO from a fan's perspective than any of us! |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
"Denise Felt" wrote:
> Actually, he's an atheist. To him, he doesn't have a soul. > Denise > I'm an atheist too, but I've got one. It's just a combination of consciousness, personality and emotions. |
In reply to this post by Doug Carlson
"See the indiviual strands in Lt. Ellis' bra", what are you talking about
Doug? We had several episodes of UFO with ladies in there underwear but to the best of my now corrected memory Gay Ellis wasn't one of them. Or do you mean with this incredible home theatre system you have that you can see the this showing through her clothes or unifrom or perhaps you are from the planet Krypton? James K. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
"Veres, Mary" <[hidden email]>
wrote: >I would think that after thirty years he might just be a little bored and >give little importance to the raving of fans. Remember that we UFO fans >saw >a different product than the actors did. Being on the inside isn't the >same >as watching from the outside, and to them at the time it was just another >job. I could easily understand that someone has little "passion" for a job >hey did 30 years ago.... Yeah, but Mary, why go at all if you don't want to be there? I go to Cons all the time, and have only once before met an actor who forgot their professionalism in front of the fans like Bishop did. And I was just as pissed about her as I was about him. Fans are willing to shell out a lot of money to meet the stars and get their memorabilia signed. It's just common courtesy to behave yourself for their sakes. It's what the whole Con is about, after all. Normally at a Con, you can expect to meet some actors who are aloof, some who are friendly, and some who want to know your life story. At the Fanderson Con, nearly everyone I met (including the fans themselves--- Hi, Dave, Mike and Kez!) was in the final category. Except Bishop. So it was glaringly obvious, and not just to me. Grumbles were heard throughout the Con about his churlishness. It was a shame. And as for actors from shows over thirty years ago, Nichelle Nichols, George Takei, and Jimmy Doohan were all very pleased to talk to the fans, in spite of not being able to remember any of their old scenes! *grin* Yours, Denise _________________________________________________________________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
Straker, somehow it's always about you.
|
<<I go to
Cons all the time, and have only once before met an actor who forgot their professionalism in front of the fans like Bishop did. >> Who what that? Who??? ===== __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
I don't know when this "incident" with Ed Bishop might have happen if it
happen at all but is very possible that it might have been the around the time his son was killed in that auto accident. If so I could see why he might not be the warmest of persons to be around. Grief does strange things to people. James K. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
> So it was glaringly obvious, and not just to me. Grumbles were > heard throughout the Con about his churlishness. It was a shame Hi everyone, As someone who knows Ed and has been on the organising Fanderson committee of some of the cons he attended I can only say that he has always maintained a professional approach to his fans and I feel that he would probably be a little upset if he knew he'd caused someone to feel disgruntled. All I can say in his defence (not that he needs defending) is that at 70 years of age, he may - just may - have been feeling a little under the weather, as I was not there I cannot comment properly. I do know what you mean about feeling disgruntled as I met another *70's star* a year or so ago and stood waiting outside the venue for a good hour or so only for this chap to almost walk past me without a word, now that was bad manners and the guy was really rude when I asked for his autograph and he didn't say a word just signed it gave me the pen back and walked away. I'm sure that if you go to another con where Ed is attending (and don't go expecting him to be rude) I'm sure you'll have a different experience. Ed Bishop is, and always has been a gentleman and a really nice man, honestly. I don't know what may have upset him at this particular convention but something obviously did - have the committee looked into it at all? As for his Straker mannerisms, I see them every time I meet him, especially when he is seen from the back, that straight posture (especially if he is in a cream suit). Bye for now. Claire [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Hi Marc,
I recently received the entire set of Konami candy UFO figures/craft, and I have one question, my Konami Gay Ellis looks a lot taller and slimmer that the examples in the photos on you website. Even allowing for some distortion and angular perspective in the images. My Konami Gay Ellis is 123mm (4.75") tall and 51mm (2") from elbow tip to elbow tip. What's yours? Is it possible (although hugely, massively unlikely) that there is more than one version? Later, Griff |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
In a message dated 23/03/03 16:58:17 GMT Standard Time, [hidden email]
writes: > but is very possible that it might have been the around the > time his son was killed in that auto accident This incident happened in January 1988. Claire [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Denise Felt
<<Actually, he's an atheist. To him, he doesn't have
a soul.>> Hm, weird. Poor guy. ===== __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com |
In reply to this post by starfire05
I always thought it was an odd and sad bit of cruel fate that Ed Bishop
played a man who lost his only son, and in real life, he lost his only son. Strange, that. Pam |
I apologise if this is old news. I see that A&E have a release date
[29/4/]and a picture of the artwork for the Supercar box set up on thier website, URL below. http://store.aetv.com/html/catalog/s03.jhtml;jsessionid=ZRYW1ZB3ZYL3YQ OXHDECCASB022MOIY4?search=supercar&x=22&y=5 The Lunadude. |
In reply to this post by ultramannick
Having met Ed Bishop at the 2000 Fanderson convention in Coventry and the
2002 convention as well, I can say that he was much more friendly and willing to mingle during the 2000 convention. He made himself more available to the convention guests in 2000 whereas he seemed to surface only for specific assigned lectures, signings and events in 2002. I would also say that he didn't seem as interested in being there in 2002 (almost like he woke up that weekend and didn't feel like going). I can only speak for myself but I would lose count of how many weekends I had made plans and I wished I could get out of them. Maybe Ed is human like the rest of us and just wasn't "in the mood" to mingle that weekend? Lorraine Marc Martin wrote: I didn't find him to be a jerk at all when I saw himat Century 21. He seemed like he was being nice & friendly with everyone. I think he must be moody or something, because sometimes we hear good things at one con, and then other times we had bad things at another con. > Marc |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Griff!
>My Konami Gay Ellis is 123mm (4.75") tall and 51mm (2") from elbow tip to
>elbow tip. What's yours? Those dimensions match my Konami Lt. Ellis as well. But I agree, the photos don't look the same as the real thing -- I guess it's true when they say that the camera adds 10 pounds... :-) Marc |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |