GSP4 Space Probe - HD Screencaps - anyone help??

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
36 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

GSP4 Space Probe - HD Screencaps - anyone help??

naughtyhector-2
Begging message time...

It's going to be some years before I can upgrade to HD television so I was wondering if someone who has recorded UFO in this format can help me.

I'm after some screencaps from the Sound Of Silence of the GSP4 Space Probe. The ordinary DVD's are wonderful but if some more detail can be gleaned from a bit more resolution from a HD recording I would be most grateful.

I have posted my screencaps in a folder called Sound Of Silence - these areenlargements of the best frame views of the craft I could get.

Regards,
Barry
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: GSP4 Space Probe - HD Screencaps - anyone help??

Marc Martin
Administrator
> I'm after some screencaps from the Sound Of Silence of the GSP4 Space
> Probe. The ordinary DVD's are wonderful but if some more detail can be
> gleaned from a bit more resolution from a HD recording I would be most
> grateful.

I can do this -- although it may not be right away, as I've got a lot
on my to-do list at the moment... but I do have that episode in high
def...

Marc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: latest Fanderson magazine

Marc Martin
Administrator
Hi all,

I got my latest Fanderson magazine the other day... I haven't sat
down and read through it all, but I did notice some things of interest
to UFO fans. For starters, there are several pages with descriptions/photos
of various UFO characters (including information on which episodes
they appear, and information on the actor/actress who played them).
This is the first part of 3 (?), and covers even characters
who appeared in only one episode.

Also, they interviewed Gerry Anderson about the film JOURNEY TO
THE FAR SIDE OF THE SUN, and in it, he talks about George Sewell
leaving UFO because the American ITC office didn't like his
looks (or should I say, his complexion?). The main point of this
was that Gerry could never bring himself to tell George the
real reason they didn't want him back... although I'm sure
I've seen this reason already appear in print -- probably
in an interview with Sylvia Anderson? I've seen so many
conflicting stories about why George left, I've never
known who to believe...

Marc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: latest Fanderson magazine

Marc Martin
Administrator
Oh, and here is a graphic that Fanderson was nice
enough to send me, which shows the layout for some
of the UFO character pages, plus the photo of Col.
Foster on the front cover:

http://ufoseries.com/temp/FAB62.jpg

Marc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: latest Fanderson magazine

davrecon-4
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
What a dumbassed reason to get rid of one of the best
characters in UFO. George was always my favorite... }:-|


------------------------------------------------------------------------


----- Original Message -----
From: Marc Martin
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [SHADO] latest Fanderson magazine


Hi all,

I got my latest Fanderson magazine the other day... I haven't sat
down and read through it all, but I did notice some things of interest
to UFO fans. For starters, there are several pages with descriptions/photos
of various UFO characters (including information on which episodes
they appear, and information on the actor/actress who played them).
This is the first part of 3 (?), and covers even characters
who appeared in only one episode.

Also, they interviewed Gerry Anderson about the film JOURNEY TO
THE FAR SIDE OF THE SUN, and in it, he talks about George Sewell
leaving UFO because the American ITC office didn't like his
looks (or should I say, his complexion?). The main point of this
was that Gerry could never bring himself to tell George the
real reason they didn't want him back... although I'm sure
I've seen this reason already appear in print -- probably
in an interview with Sylvia Anderson? I've seen so many
conflicting stories about why George left, I've never
known who to believe...

Marc





------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.35/2033 - Release Date: 3/31/2009 1:05 PM


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: latest Fanderson magazine

Alan Briscoe
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Thanks for the scans from the FAB magazine Marc.

--- On Tue, 31/3/09, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [SHADO] latest Fanderson magazine
To: [hidden email]
Date: Tuesday, 31 March, 2009, 10:09 PM






Oh, and here is a graphic that Fanderson was nice
enough to send me, which shows the layout for some
of the UFO character pages, plus the photo of Col.
Foster on the front cover:

http://ufoseries. com/temp/ FAB62.jpg

Marc

















     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: latest Fanderson magazine

Jason Sweet-2
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
I concur completely!

Jason M. Sweet
Social Science Instructor
[hidden email]

--- On Tue, 3/31/09, davrecon <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: davrecon <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [SHADO] latest Fanderson magazine
To: [hidden email]
Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 7:25 PM






What a dumbassed reason to get rid of one of the best
characters in UFO. George was always my favorite... }:-|

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

----- Original Message -----
From: Marc Martin
To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [SHADO] latest Fanderson magazine

Hi all,

I got my latest Fanderson magazine the other day... I haven't sat
down and read through it all, but I did notice some things of interest
to UFO fans. For starters, there are several pages with descriptions/ photos
of various UFO characters (including information on which episodes
they appear, and information on the actor/actress who played them).
This is the first part of 3 (?), and covers even characters
who appeared in only one episode.

Also, they interviewed Gerry Anderson about the film JOURNEY TO
THE FAR SIDE OF THE SUN, and in it, he talks about George Sewell
leaving UFO because the American ITC office didn't like his
looks (or should I say, his complexion?) . The main point of this
was that Gerry could never bring himself to tell George the
real reason they didn't want him back... although I'm sure
I've seen this reason already appear in print -- probably
in an interview with Sylvia Anderson? I've seen so many
conflicting stories about why George left, I've never
known who to believe...

Marc

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.35/2033 - Release Date: 3/31/20091:05 PM

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

















     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: latest Fanderson magazine

David Richards-2
What exactly was wrong with George's complexion (in the eyes of the
deadheads at ITCAmeraica)?



From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
Jason Sweet
Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2009 12:55 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [SHADO] latest Fanderson magazine



I concur completely!

Jason M. Sweet
Social Science Instructor
[hidden email] <mailto:hurdlehawk%40yahoo.com>

--- On Tue, 3/31/09, davrecon <[hidden email]
<mailto:davrecon%40rochester.rr.com> > wrote:

From: davrecon <[hidden email]
<mailto:davrecon%40rochester.rr.com> >
Subject: Re: [SHADO] latest Fanderson magazine
To: [hidden email] <mailto:SHADO%40yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 7:25 PM

What a dumbassed reason to get rid of one of the best
characters in UFO. George was always my favorite... }:-|

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

----- Original Message -----
From: Marc Martin
To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [SHADO] latest Fanderson magazine

Hi all,

I got my latest Fanderson magazine the other day... I haven't sat
down and read through it all, but I did notice some things of interest
to UFO fans. For starters, there are several pages with descriptions/ photos
of various UFO characters (including information on which episodes
they appear, and information on the actor/actress who played them).
This is the first part of 3 (?), and covers even characters
who appeared in only one episode.

Also, they interviewed Gerry Anderson about the film JOURNEY TO
THE FAR SIDE OF THE SUN, and in it, he talks about George Sewell
leaving UFO because the American ITC office didn't like his
looks (or should I say, his complexion?) . The main point of this
was that Gerry could never bring himself to tell George the
real reason they didn't want him back... although I'm sure
I've seen this reason already appear in print -- probably
in an interview with Sylvia Anderson? I've seen so many
conflicting stories about why George left, I've never
known who to believe...

Marc

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.35/2033 - Release Date: 3/31/2009
1:05 PM

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

George Sewell

Griff
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Hi All...

Yes, I have heard this story about the demise of the Alec Freeman's character, "because of George Sewell's looks not being popular with the American audience" a few times, and told in a few versions - as Marc said, many of the stories relating to UFO and some of the other shows have 'to be taken with a pinch of salt'.

This attitude (if it is true - and probably is) is extremely regrettable, and probably goes on a lot in the film and TV industry.

I have always thought that George gave a warmth, sincerity and charm to theshow in bucket loads. His character even though "by today's standards" could be said at times to be un-pc or even as Gerry said "a womanizer", I think he still carried it off, and only the most staunch critic could have beenoffended, and in my opinion George was a HUGE asset to the show, and UFO would not have been the same without him. This is one of the reasons I do prefer the 1st block of UFO episodes to the 2nd.

Best to you all :)

Griff
 

>
> Also, they interviewed Gerry Anderson about the film JOURNEY TO
> THE FAR SIDE OF THE SUN, and in it, he talks about George Sewell
> leaving UFO because the American ITC office didn't like his
> looks (or should I say, his complexion?). The main point of this
> was that Gerry could never bring himself to tell George the
> real reason they didn't want him back... although I'm sure
> I've seen this reason already appear in print -- probably
> in an interview with Sylvia Anderson? I've seen so many
> conflicting stories about why George left, I've never
> known who to believe...
>
> Marc
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: George Sewell

Marc Martin
Administrator
In reply to this post by David Richards-2
> What exactly was wrong with George's complexion (in the eyes of the
> deadheads at ITCAmeraica)?

The phrase that I've seen is "pock-marked face".

I'm still not sure when this ITC America comment was made -- was it
made very early on, and was the reason for bringing in Mike Billington?
Or was it made later, and was the reason for bringing in
Wanda Ventham?

Marc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: George Sewell

David Richards-2
Well that sucks - a bit of character to a person instead of plastic Ken doll
uniformity and banality - and they ditch a fine actor.



How petty and superficial.







From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Marc
Martin
Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2009 11:55 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: RE: [SHADO] George Sewell



> What exactly was wrong with George's complexion (in the eyes of the
> deadheads at ITCAmeraica)?

The phrase that I've seen is "pock-marked face".

I'm still not sure when this ITC America comment was made -- was it
made very early on, and was the reason for bringing in Mike Billington?
Or was it made later, and was the reason for bringing in
Wanda Ventham?

Marc





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: George Sewell

Alan Briscoe
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
The story about George not being asked back to UFO because of his looks only emerged a couple of years ago after he died. Perhaps while he was still alive it was more diplomatic not to mention this publicly. George was a fineactor but I do feel the Alec Freeman character was lacklustre and I can understand a desire to replace the character for this reason but not on the grounds of appearance. I'm not sure if the producers quite knew what to do with the Freeman character or if George was really comfortable in the role, although his performances were still good. I do think Straker had much better interplay with Wanda Ventham in the second block. Gary Raymond was excellent as Colonel Grey in "The Man Who Came Back" and I wonder if he would have been a better choice as the SHADO number two from the start? Maybe though George and Freeman would have shone more if the first block had the better quality of writing and direction of the later episodes.
 
Alan

--- On Wed, 1/4/09, David Richards <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: David Richards <[hidden email]>
Subject: RE: [SHADO] George Sewell
To: [hidden email]
Date: Wednesday, 1 April, 2009, 10:26 PM






Well that sucks - a bit of character to a person instead of plastic Ken doll
uniformity and banality - and they ditch a fine actor.

How petty and superficial.

From: SHADO@yahoogroups. com [mailto:SHADO@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Marc
Martin
Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2009 11:55 PM
To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
Subject: RE: [SHADO] George Sewell

> What exactly was wrong with George's complexion (in the eyes of the
> deadheads at ITCAmeraica) ?

The phrase that I've seen is "pock-marked face".

I'm still not sure when this ITC America comment was made -- was it
made very early on, and was the reason for bringing in Mike Billington?
Or was it made later, and was the reason for bringing in
Wanda Ventham?

Marc

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

















     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: George Sewell

Bruce Sherman
A couple of years after he died?? He only died a couple of months ago. I heard and I believe he said, when there was a break in filming when it was moved between studios, he had other commitments, so he couldn't return.

Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Briscoe
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:14 PM
Subject: RE: [SHADO] George Sewell


The story about George not being asked back to UFO because of his looks only emerged a couple of years ago after he died. Perhaps while he was still alive it was more diplomatic not to mention this publicly. George was a fine actor but I do feel the Alec Freeman character was lacklustre and I can understand a desire to replace the character for this reason but not on the grounds of appearance. I'm not sure if the producers quite knew what to do with the Freeman character or if George was really comfortable in the role, although his performances were still good. I do think Straker had much better interplay with Wanda Ventham in the second block. Gary Raymond was excellent as Colonel Grey in "The Man Who Came Back" and I wonder if he would have been a better choice as the SHADO number two from the start? Maybe though George and Freeman would have shone more if the first block had the better quality of writing and direction of the later episodes.

Alan

--- On Wed, 1/4/09, David Richards <[hidden email]> wrote:

From: David Richards <[hidden email]>
Subject: RE: [SHADO] George Sewell
To: [hidden email]
Date: Wednesday, 1 April, 2009, 10:26 PM

Well that sucks - a bit of character to a person instead of plastic Ken doll
uniformity and banality - and they ditch a fine actor.

How petty and superficial.

From: SHADO@yahoogroups. com [mailto:SHADO@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Marc
Martin
Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2009 11:55 PM
To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
Subject: RE: [SHADO] George Sewell

> What exactly was wrong with George's complexion (in the eyes of the
> deadheads at ITCAmeraica) ?

The phrase that I've seen is "pock-marked face".

I'm still not sure when this ITC America comment was made -- was it
made very early on, and was the reason for bringing in Mike Billington?
Or was it made later, and was the reason for bringing in
Wanda Ventham?

Marc

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: George Sewell

pointy100
Bruce,

George died exactly 2 years ago today (2nd April 2007) at 82.

David

--- In [hidden email], "Bruce Sherman" <brucesherman@...> wrote:

>
> A couple of years after he died?? He only died a couple of months ago. I heard and I believe he said, when there was a break in filming when it was moved between studios, he had other commitments, so he couldn't return.
>
> Bruce
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Alan Briscoe
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:14 PM
> Subject: RE: [SHADO] George Sewell
>
>
> The story about George not being asked back to UFO because of his looksonly emerged a couple of years ago after he died. Perhaps while he was still alive it was more diplomatic not to mention this publicly. George was a fine actor but I do feel the Alec Freeman character was lacklustre and I can understand a desire to replace the character for this reason but not on the grounds of appearance. I'm not sure if the producers quite knew what to do with the Freeman character or if George was really comfortable in the role, although his performances were still good. I do think Straker had much better interplay with Wanda Ventham in the second block. Gary Raymond was excellent as Colonel Grey in "The Man Who Came Back" and I wonder if he would have been a better choice as the SHADO number two from the start? Maybe though George and Freeman would have shone more if the first block had the better quality of writing and direction of the later episodes.
>    
> Alan
>
> --- On Wed, 1/4/09, David Richards <dcr_au@...> wrote:
>
> From: David Richards <dcr_au@...>
> Subject: RE: [SHADO] George Sewell
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Wednesday, 1 April, 2009, 10:26 PM
>
> Well that sucks - a bit of character to a person instead of plastic Kendoll
> uniformity and banality - and they ditch a fine actor.
>
> How petty and superficial.
>
> From: SHADO@yahoogroups. com [mailto:SHADO@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Marc
> Martin
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2009 11:55 PM
> To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: RE: [SHADO] George Sewell
>
> > What exactly was wrong with George's complexion (in the eyes of the
> > deadheads at ITCAmeraica) ?
>
> The phrase that I've seen is "pock-marked face".
>
> I'm still not sure when this ITC America comment was made -- was it
> made very early on, and was the reason for bringing in Mike Billington?
> Or was it made later, and was the reason for bringing in
> Wanda Ventham?
>
> Marc
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>  
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: George Sewell

Bruce Sherman
wow, really.. it seems we just spoke about it a couple of months ago that it happened :(

Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: pointy100
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:52 AM
Subject: [SHADO] Re: George Sewell


Bruce,

George died exactly 2 years ago today (2nd April 2007) at 82.

David

--- In [hidden email], "Bruce Sherman" <brucesherman@...> wrote:

>
> A couple of years after he died?? He only died a couple of months ago. I heard and I believe he said, when there was a break in filming when it was moved between studios, he had other commitments, so he couldn't return.
>
> Bruce
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Alan Briscoe
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:14 PM
> Subject: RE: [SHADO] George Sewell
>
>
> The story about George not being asked back to UFO because of his looks only emerged a couple of years ago after he died. Perhaps while he was still alive it was more diplomatic not to mention this publicly. George was a fine actor but I do feel the Alec Freeman character was lacklustre and I can understand a desire to replace the character for this reason but not on the grounds of appearance. I'm not sure if the producers quite knew what to do with the Freeman character or if George was really comfortable in the role, although his performances were still good. I do think Straker had much better interplay with Wanda Ventham in the second block. Gary Raymond was excellent as Colonel Grey in "The Man Who Came Back" and I wonder if he would have been a better choice as the SHADO number two from the start? Maybe though George and Freeman would have shone more if the first block had the better quality of writing and direction of the later episodes.
>
> Alan
>
> --- On Wed, 1/4/09, David Richards <dcr_au@...> wrote:
>
> From: David Richards <dcr_au@...>
> Subject: RE: [SHADO] George Sewell
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Wednesday, 1 April, 2009, 10:26 PM
>
> Well that sucks - a bit of character to a person instead of plastic Ken doll
> uniformity and banality - and they ditch a fine actor.
>
> How petty and superficial.
>
> From: SHADO@yahoogroups. com [mailto:SHADO@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Marc
> Martin
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2009 11:55 PM
> To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: RE: [SHADO] George Sewell
>
> > What exactly was wrong with George's complexion (in the eyes of the
> > deadheads at ITCAmeraica) ?
>
> The phrase that I've seen is "pock-marked face".
>
> I'm still not sure when this ITC America comment was made -- was it
> made very early on, and was the reason for bringing in Mike Billington?
> Or was it made later, and was the reason for bringing in
> Wanda Ventham?
>
> Marc
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: George Sewell

Marc Martin
Administrator
In reply to this post by Bruce Sherman
> The story about George not being asked back to UFO because of his looks
> only emerged a couple of years ago after he died.

That story emerged long before George's death -- I have an old issue of
TIME SCREEN magazine (issue 18, Spring 1992), which features an interview
with Sylvia Anderson. According to Sylvia:

"Originally we cast George Sewell as the second lead because
we were always being accused of only having beautiful people
in the series. I thought he would give an air of realism as
the sidekick of Ed Straker, and it worked extremely well.
He's a very good actor, a charming person to work with, and
was a good foil for Straker. But after two or three episodes
I had a phone call from Lew Grade who said he'd shown the
pictures to the Americans who were buying it and they said
they hated the man with the pock-marked face. He told me
we'd have to recast *immediately* and that he wanted someone
by the following week. I had to ring round and remember all
the people I'd seen before we started casting. I recalled
that I'd seen a young actor called Michael Billington, who'd
impressed me, but I'd felt "I don't know how to fit him in",
because I I'd already got the lead and was looking for a
sidekick who wasn't young necessarily, and would add a
bit of realism. So I tried to track him down, and I think
he was sleeping on a beach of something. Anyway, we managed
to get him back, and rushed him into the studio, and
everything went wrong with his test: the door fell down and
he was terribly nervous, but when it came up on the screen I
thought I was absolutely right. I'd tested about six actors
by then and when Lew Grade saw the tests he turned to me
and said, "That's the one, Michael Billington". So we then
built up his role and he proved to be one of the most
popular characters."

Marc
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: George Sewell

pointy100
In reply to this post by Alan Briscoe
Alan,

It's interesting to hear other views on this. I'm at the opposite side to you on this one. With all due respect to Wanda, I didn't think she convincedin her role at all. When George left, the series lost a good foil for Straker with the long-standing friendship between them. Only he could relate toStraker as other than a subordinate. And Freeman himself was a good character IMO - nicely down to earth and with sufficient gravitas to be able to throw some weight around when needed.

Michael was already upping the swoon coefficient in the series so removing George for cosmetic reasons seems a particularly egregious act of stupidityon the part of the producers.

David



--- In [hidden email], Alan Briscoe <alanbnew@...> wrote:

>
> The story about George not being asked back to UFO because of his looks only emerged a couple of years ago after he died. Perhaps while he was stillalive it was more diplomatic not to mention this publicly. George was a fine actor but I do feel the Alec Freeman character was lacklustre and I can understand a desire to replace the character for this reason but not on thegrounds of appearance. I'm not sure if the producers quite knew what to dowith the Freeman character or if George was really comfortable in the role, although his performances were still good. I do think Straker had much better interplay with Wanda Ventham in the second block. Gary Raymond was excellent as Colonel Grey in "The Man Who Came Back" and I wonder if he would have been a better choice as the SHADO number two from the start? Maybe though George and Freeman would have shone more if the first block had the better quality of writing and direction of the later episodes.
>  
> Alan
>
> --- On Wed, 1/4/09, David Richards <dcr_au@...> wrote:
>
>
> From: David Richards <dcr_au@...>
> Subject: RE: [SHADO] George Sewell
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Wednesday, 1 April, 2009, 10:26 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Well that sucks - a bit of character to a person instead of plastic Ken doll
> uniformity and banality - and they ditch a fine actor.
>
> How petty and superficial.
>
> From: SHADO@yahoogroups. com [mailto:SHADO@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf OfMarc
> Martin
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2009 11:55 PM
> To: SHADO@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: RE: [SHADO] George Sewell
>
> > What exactly was wrong with George's complexion (in the eyes of the
> > deadheads at ITCAmeraica) ?
>
> The phrase that I've seen is "pock-marked face".
>
> I'm still not sure when this ITC America comment was made -- was it
> made very early on, and was the reason for bringing in Mike Billington?
> Or was it made later, and was the reason for bringing in
> Wanda Ventham?
>
> Marc
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>      
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: George Sewell

~Agent April Dancer~
In reply to this post by Marc Martin

<< Hi All... Yes, I have heard this story about the demise of the Alec Freeman's character, "because of George Sewell's looks not being popular with the American audience" a few times, and told in a few versions - as Marc said, many of the stories relating to UFO and some of the other shows have 'to be taken with a pinch of salt'.

This attitude (if it is true - and probably is) is extremely regrettable, and probably goes on a lot in the film and TV industry. >>

You can bet it does.. Sadly.:(

<< I have always thought that George gave a warmth, sincerity and charm to the show in bucket loads. His character even though "by today's standards" could be said at times to be un-pc or even as Gerry said "a womanizer", I think he still carried it off, and only the most staunch critic could have been offended, and in my opinion George was a HUGE asset to the show, and UFO would not have been the same without him. This is one of the reasons I do prefer the 1st block of UFO episodes to the 2nd. Best to you all :) Griff >>

It was for all the above and more I love Alec's chararcter the best on UFO.

He was the best balounced character of all of them. And when was allowed. Made the better commander.

April.
jks
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: George Sewell

jks
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
I'm not sure that two different stories aren't being confused here.

There's the introduction of Michael Billington which probably happened
as Sylvia Anderson told it, but George Sewell not returning after the
unforeseen break in production was, as I understand it, a separate matter.

I may well have missed something, but I've never seen anything to
suggest that he wasn't asked back for the second block of production,
just that he wasn't available. Anyone outside the UK, or not old enough
to remember, may not realise that George Sewell was one of the busier
TV and theatre actors of the period, so this is entirely plausible in
the absence of any evidence to the contrary.

Regards
John
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: George Sewell

Marc Martin
Administrator
> I'm not sure that two different stories aren't being confused here.

It could be, and it also could be that in this new interview with
Gerry Anderson, it is Gerry who is confused (as he is the one
who is connecting the poor American reaction with George leaving
the series, while Sylvia on the other hand is only connecting
the poor American reaction with the introduction of Mike Billington).

Still, I assume that some of the actors must have been contractually
obliged to return for UFO's second shooting block? Maybe the
producers saw that Ed Bishop and Mike Billington were necessary,
but George Sewell was not and allowed to find other work? Or
maybe there were no contracts, and everyone (including Ed Bishop)
was "replaceable".

Marc
12