Hey guys, these are great discussions - I have wondered how the operatives
got in and out of the Mobiles, or how the pilots entered the Interceptors. All we see on-screen are the three "pads" elevating the Interceptors to Moon-level so they can take off. Also, the point about the unsafe helmets is well-taken - hopefully a UFO2 series/pilot film will address some of these concerns properly. I've always felt the Interceptor pilots should have been wearing flight suits more akin to John Glenn's original suit, with a full helmet and breathing apparatus attached. That way, if a pilot had to bail out if the aliens shot up his ship, he could survive in space until help arrived. Conventional fighter planes here on earth do have eject modes etc. Maybe SHADO should have a special rescue squad to pick up astronauts who've had to eject. It isn't easy to replace such trained personnel and the air forces of many nations do provide escape means if the aircraft are compromised. What say you? Pam |
I suspect there are roof hatches for the mobile drivers.
Grant. -----Original Message----- From: Pam McCaughey [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: 16 January 2001 15:23 To: [hidden email] Subject: [SHADO] Re: How do you get into a Mobile? or an Interceptor? Hey guys, these are great discussions - I have wondered how the operatives got in and out of the Mobiles, or how the pilots entered the Interceptors. All we see on-screen are the three "pads" elevating the Interceptors to Moon-level so they can take off. Also, the point about the unsafe helmets is well-taken - hopefully a UFO2 series/pilot film will address some of these concerns properly. I've always felt the Interceptor pilots should have been wearing flight suits more akin to John Glenn's original suit, with a full helmet and breathing apparatus attached. That way, if a pilot had to bail out if the aliens shot up his ship, he could survive in space until help arrived. Conventional fighter planes here on earth do have eject modes etc. Maybe SHADO should have a special rescue squad to pick up astronauts who've had to eject. It isn't easy to replace such trained personnel and the air forces of many nations do provide escape means if the aircraft are compromised. What say you? Pam **************************************************************************** ******* Legally privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee(s) legally indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message, and notify us immediately. If you or your employer does not consent to Internet e-mail messages of this kind, please advise us immediately. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by West Herts College unless otherwise indicated by an authorised representative independent of this message. Please note that neither West Herts College nor I accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan attachments (if any). [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Pam McCaughey
Yeah, I love this discussion, don't recall seeing one like this
before. It gets us thinking about the "back end" (so to speak) of UFO - how things work and stuff. Valuable info for UFO resurrection. Is eGroups dropping posts? I don't think I got the original message in this thread. Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: Pam McCaughey <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 10:22 AM Subject: [SHADO] Re: How do you get into a Mobile? or an Interceptor? | Hey guys, these are great discussions - I have wondered how the operatives | got in and out of the Mobiles, or how the pilots entered the Interceptors. | All we see on-screen are the three "pads" elevating the Interceptors to | Moon-level so they can take off. Also, the point about the unsafe helmets is | well-taken - hopefully a UFO2 series/pilot film will address some of these | concerns properly. | | I've always felt the Interceptor pilots should have been wearing flight | suits more akin to John Glenn's original suit, with a full helmet and | breathing apparatus attached. That way, if a pilot had to bail out if the | aliens shot up his ship, he could survive in space until help arrived. | Conventional fighter planes here on earth do have eject modes etc. Maybe | SHADO should have a special rescue squad to pick up astronauts who've had to | eject. It isn't easy to replace such trained personnel and the air forces of | many nations do provide escape means if the aircraft are compromised. What | say you? |
In reply to this post by Pam McCaughey
> I've always felt the Interceptor pilots should have been wearing flight
> suits more akin to John Glenn's original suit, with a full helmet and > breathing apparatus attached. That way, if a pilot had to bail out if the > aliens shot up his ship, he could survive in space until help arrived. > Conventional fighter planes here on earth do have eject modes etc. Maybe There's been much speculation about Interceptor pilot launches for years. Upon examining close-ups of the Interceptor FX model and the publicity shots of the launch silo, I'm of the opinion that the pilots are in fact *lifted* into their cockpits via launch tubes, very similar to the method of entry for the Angel pilots in "Captain Scarlet". [They sit in their flight seats, which are situated in an elevator, and these are then injected through the bottom of their craft waiting above on the launch catapult] On the underside of the large FX model there appears to be panel work that at least *implies* that there is supposed to be an entry hatch of some description beneath the cockpit area. And on the launch pad itself (barely visible in the FX shots) are circular marks right in the middle, indicating a round hatch, (possibly to accommodate a tube that would shoot up the centre of the pad when its still at the bottom of the silo. So I guess, the pilot would slide down his chute to an area *beneath* the silo, (being delivered to his flight seat), and then be lifted up inside his airtight tube, through the bottom of the pad on top of which his Interceptor rests. The tube would retract, the underside hatch close up, and the Interceptor would then be ready for lifting to the lunar surface. Kelly Kelly Patrick Lannan The Gerry Anderson Memorabilia Site <[hidden email]> http://www.users.bigpond.com/BASE_KOALA/GA.Memorabilia/Information.htm |
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
Kelly wrote:
> ... the pilot would slide down his chute to > an area *beneath* the silo, [into] his flight seat), > and then be lifted up inside his airtight tube, ... --- In [hidden email], "Hemmings, R.K." <rkh@l...> wrote: > Obviously the pilots are still vulnerable to damage-induced > air leaks, but, as SHADO pilots are so well trained, this will > never occur ... If Interceptors spend all their time blowing up UFO's, then they would be very vulnerable to bits of flying debris from exploded UFOs. Unless it is in the nature of UFO's that when a missile hit makes the UFO's engine explode, the UFO and the missile are both completely evaporated every time. But after at least one UFO explosion on or near the ground on Earth, someone found "no bit bigger than ....", i.e. small bits surviving to become shrapnel, and not complete evaporation. So Interceptor pilots would be advised to wear full space-type pressure suits. And what happens when an Interceptor has to land astray somewhere on the Moon? For a rescue team, extracting a spacesuitless pilot from a grounded Intereptor would be a lot harder than if he wore a spacesuit and could merely walk out of it, either by blowing the canopy off or down through the cockpit floor. > Interceptors do not dog-fight. If the UFO has a good plasma beam gun (or whatever they have), the fight may well get somewhat like a dogfight. I seem to remember that in one TV episode (Identified?) a UFO did shoot an Interceptor down. After a while the aliens would develop counter-measures, and the job would gradually stop being a turkey-shoot. > They're simply a vector for delivering the missiles, So were the jet fighters in "Topgun", usually, but the fights were still like dogfights. OK, the fights needed different skills from a dogfight against an aircraft or spacecraft made by humans. > something which could easily be done without a pilot > (..or even without an Interceptor!) Huh???? E.g. the postman is merely a vector for delivering the mail, but the mail wouldn't come if the postman wasn't there. |
In reply to this post by KELLY PATRICK LANNAN
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
--- In [hidden email], "Hemmings, R.K." <rkh@l...> wrote:
> I meant that self-propelling Moonbase-guided missiles could do the > job just as well as Interceptor-delivered ones ... No. A missile sent from the Moon would have further to fly and it would be easier for the UFO to dodge it. |
Anthony wrote:
>> meant that self-propelling Moonbase-guided missiles could do the >>job just as well as Interceptor-delivered ones ... > > No. A missile sent from the Moon would have further to fly and it > would be easier for the UFO to dodge it. OK, you win.. that's exactly the point I was mak.. (oh, never mind.) Triple Blimey! - James is now unWAPed! -- BCNU! |
[hidden email] wrote:
> Anthony wrote: > OK, you win.. that's exactly the point I was mak.. (oh, never mind.) > Triple Blimey! - James is now unWAPed! > -- > BCNU! > Er .. pardon? :/ |
James wrote:
>>Triple Blimey! - James is now unWAPed! > Er .. pardon? :/ Sorry, James, that was highly encrypted (might as well blame Lieve - the Belgians invented Stella Artois, did they not? <hic!>) Welcome back! The 'unWAPed' comment was because I believe you travel a 'fair bit'.. "Web-enabled" 'phones and related info.-delivering systems are used far more in other locations, and I was wondering if you'd accidentally 'come across' any evidence of decline in such hinted-at areas? (f.i. are current 'international news stories', supposedly based on fact, anywhere near reality when they report that 'social outcast' status can be achieved simply by *not* playing the latest WAP-enabled 'phone game?) Regards -- Rob |
Rob wrote:
>James wrote: > > >>Triple Blimey! - James is now unWAPed! > > > Er .. pardon? :/ > >Sorry, James, that was highly encrypted (might as well blame >Lieve - the Belgians invented Stella Artois, did they not? <hic!>) Actually we invented beer, not merely Stella (which is brewed in my home town, Leuven, ergo, I hate the taste of it) which I would not call beer really (wouldn't you call it Lager in the UK, actually?). The stuff we turn out at MarsBase is a lot better, it uses the traditional methods - hence no chemicals.... (it's based on Peterman, which was the ORIGINAL Stella Artois before the chemicals were used) What you should really drink (apart from the MarsBaseBeer) is beer brewed at abbeys, they are good for one's health... I see the BBC are still showing Thunderbirds - just how many eps were there of that series? What will they show when they run out of eps? UFO? Nah, that would be too good to be true.... CU Lieve * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Lieve Peten, Vlaanderen, Belgium : Mailto:[hidden email] * Internet Sites link page: http://pinball.iwarp.com/mysites.html * The Pinball Site * Loch Ness + UFOs in Belgium * Vangelis * * Nikita * UFO TV-series * Animated Gifs * Andrea Bocelli * |
In reply to this post by fab-ufo
[hidden email] wrote:
> James wrote: > > >>Triple Blimey! - James is now unWAPed! > > > Er .. pardon? :/ > > Sorry, James, that was highly encrypted (might as well blame > Lieve - the Belgians invented Stella Artois, did they not? <hic!>) I believe so .. reasurringly expensive, I also believe .. > Welcome back! The 'unWAPed' comment was because I believe > you travel a 'fair bit'.. > "Web-enabled" 'phones and related info.-delivering systems > are used far more in other locations, and I was wondering > if you'd accidentally 'come across' any evidence of decline in > such hinted-at areas? (f.i. are current 'international news > stories', supposedly based on fact, anywhere near reality when > they report that 'social outcast' status can be achieved simply > by *not* playing the latest WAP-enabled 'phone game?) > I see .. I wondered if you might be referring to WAP phones, but have never owned one myself - hence the confusion.. I am lucky enough to be able to get around a fair bit with my job but unfortunately nearly always to the same three or four places. I can't claim to be au-fait with the latest technological trends vis-a-vis WAP, hence am probably a social outcast by default in some places .. my girfriend tells me that being seen with last year's MD walkman will get you laughed at in the street in Hong Kong .. apparently you can be arrested for carrying a cassette walkman there now .. Later, Lieve wrote: > I see the BBC are still showing Thunderbirds - just how many eps were > there of that series? What will they show when they run out of eps? > UFO? Nah, that would be too good to be true.... I think there were 32 TB eps. James |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |